{"title":"学者们想要的数字阅读","authors":"Juliane Franze, K. Marriott, Michael Wybrow","doi":"10.1145/2644866.2644894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers constantly read and annotate academic documents. While almost all documents are provided digitally, many are still printed and read on paper. We surveyed 162 academics in order to better understand their reading habits and preferences. We were particularly interested in understanding the barriers to digital reading and the features desired by academics for digital reading applications.","PeriodicalId":91385,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":"199-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What academics want when reading digitally\",\"authors\":\"Juliane Franze, K. Marriott, Michael Wybrow\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2644866.2644894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers constantly read and annotate academic documents. While almost all documents are provided digitally, many are still printed and read on paper. We surveyed 162 academics in order to better understand their reading habits and preferences. We were particularly interested in understanding the barriers to digital reading and the features desired by academics for digital reading applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"199-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2644866.2644894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2644866.2644894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Researchers constantly read and annotate academic documents. While almost all documents are provided digitally, many are still printed and read on paper. We surveyed 162 academics in order to better understand their reading habits and preferences. We were particularly interested in understanding the barriers to digital reading and the features desired by academics for digital reading applications.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
