现代数据仓库中的数据建模:新分析平台中上下文中模型的比较

Raissa SILVA MENEZES DE SANTANA
{"title":"现代数据仓库中的数据建模:新分析平台中上下文中模型的比较","authors":"Raissa SILVA MENEZES DE SANTANA","doi":"10.35265/2236-6717-234-12613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the second half of the 1980s, companies only stored data from their transactional systems. However, naturally, the need arose to obtain metrics based on data that could support decision makers in their management activities. As a result, several types of Decision Support Systems were developed, such as Data Warehouses. This is a technology in which data is extracted from transactional systems, subsequently transformed and loaded into a database. In this way, end users were able to perform analyses from multiple perspectives through a single, integrated source of data. This was a successful model for a long time, until the 2000s saw an exponential growth in the amount and variety of data generated by organizations. This spurred the development of technologies for distributed storage and processing such as Hadoop, and then cloud computing platforms such as Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud. This new context of analytical environments has brought about important changes, such as a significant decrease in data storage costs and the decoupling of processing and storage. In view of this, it is natural to ask questions such as: do traditional data models like Star Schema still make sense nowadays or is the best option to embrace bolder proposals like One Big Table? When investigating what data professionals are thinking about the subject, one realizes that there is no consensus around the topic. This is because each specific case presents its own peculiarities, so that no model will meet the needs of all situations. However, despite these limitations, it is possible to achieve a balanced result between storage, maintenance, and performance by knowing the advantages and disadvantages presented by each of them.","PeriodicalId":21289,"journal":{"name":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MODELAGEM DE DADOS EM DATA WAREHOUSES MODERNOS: COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE MODELOS NO CONTEXTO NAS NOVAS PLATAFORMAS ANALÍTICAS\",\"authors\":\"Raissa SILVA MENEZES DE SANTANA\",\"doi\":\"10.35265/2236-6717-234-12613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the second half of the 1980s, companies only stored data from their transactional systems. However, naturally, the need arose to obtain metrics based on data that could support decision makers in their management activities. As a result, several types of Decision Support Systems were developed, such as Data Warehouses. This is a technology in which data is extracted from transactional systems, subsequently transformed and loaded into a database. In this way, end users were able to perform analyses from multiple perspectives through a single, integrated source of data. This was a successful model for a long time, until the 2000s saw an exponential growth in the amount and variety of data generated by organizations. This spurred the development of technologies for distributed storage and processing such as Hadoop, and then cloud computing platforms such as Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud. This new context of analytical environments has brought about important changes, such as a significant decrease in data storage costs and the decoupling of processing and storage. In view of this, it is natural to ask questions such as: do traditional data models like Star Schema still make sense nowadays or is the best option to embrace bolder proposals like One Big Table? When investigating what data professionals are thinking about the subject, one realizes that there is no consensus around the topic. This is because each specific case presents its own peculiarities, so that no model will meet the needs of all situations. However, despite these limitations, it is possible to achieve a balanced result between storage, maintenance, and performance by knowing the advantages and disadvantages presented by each of them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-234-12613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-234-12613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪80年代后半期之后,公司只存储来自其事务系统的数据。然而,自然地,需要获得基于数据的度量,这些数据可以支持决策者的管理活动。因此,开发了几种类型的决策支持系统,例如数据仓库。这是一种从事务系统中提取数据的技术,随后转换并加载到数据库中。通过这种方式,最终用户能够通过单个集成数据源从多个角度执行分析。在很长一段时间内,这是一个成功的模式,直到2000年代,组织产生的数据数量和种类呈指数级增长。这刺激了分布式存储和处理技术的发展,如Hadoop,然后是云计算平台,如Azure、AWS和Google cloud。这种新的分析环境带来了重要的变化,例如数据存储成本的显著降低以及处理和存储的解耦。考虑到这一点,人们自然会提出这样的问题:像星型模式这样的传统数据模型在今天是否仍然有意义?还是接受像One Big Table这样更大胆的提议的最佳选择?在调查数据专业人员对该主题的看法时,人们意识到围绕该主题没有达成共识。这是因为每个具体的案例都有自己的特点,所以没有一个模型能够满足所有情况的需要。然而,尽管存在这些限制,通过了解存储、维护和性能各自的优缺点,还是有可能在存储、维护和性能之间取得平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MODELAGEM DE DADOS EM DATA WAREHOUSES MODERNOS: COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE MODELOS NO CONTEXTO NAS NOVAS PLATAFORMAS ANALÍTICAS
After the second half of the 1980s, companies only stored data from their transactional systems. However, naturally, the need arose to obtain metrics based on data that could support decision makers in their management activities. As a result, several types of Decision Support Systems were developed, such as Data Warehouses. This is a technology in which data is extracted from transactional systems, subsequently transformed and loaded into a database. In this way, end users were able to perform analyses from multiple perspectives through a single, integrated source of data. This was a successful model for a long time, until the 2000s saw an exponential growth in the amount and variety of data generated by organizations. This spurred the development of technologies for distributed storage and processing such as Hadoop, and then cloud computing platforms such as Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud. This new context of analytical environments has brought about important changes, such as a significant decrease in data storage costs and the decoupling of processing and storage. In view of this, it is natural to ask questions such as: do traditional data models like Star Schema still make sense nowadays or is the best option to embrace bolder proposals like One Big Table? When investigating what data professionals are thinking about the subject, one realizes that there is no consensus around the topic. This is because each specific case presents its own peculiarities, so that no model will meet the needs of all situations. However, despite these limitations, it is possible to achieve a balanced result between storage, maintenance, and performance by knowing the advantages and disadvantages presented by each of them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
QUALIDADE DA ENERGIA ELÉTRICA EM UMA MICRORREDE TRIFÁSICA ISOLADA FORMADA POR INVERSORES BIDIRECIONAIS AGREGANDO GERAÇÃO FOTOVOLTAICA DISTRIBUÍDA ESTRATÉGIAS E DESAFIOS NA GESTÃO DE PESSOAS NO SERVIÇO PÚBLICO FEDERAL UMA REVISÃO BIBLIOGRÁFICA SEGURANÇA CIBERNÉTICA - ESTUDO DAS TÉCNICAS DE ATAQUES CIBERNÉTICOS (PHISHING, RANSMWARE, DDOS) DE ENGENHARIA SOCIAL E MEDIDAS DE PREVENÇÃO FATORES DE RISCO PARA SÍNDROME METABÓLICA EM ADULTOS NO BRASIL PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE FORTALECIMENTO DOS CONSELHOS ESCOLARES: A POLÍTICA DE FORMAÇÃO PARA CONSELHEIROS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1