“欧亚问题”

Liesbeth Rosen Jacobson
{"title":"“欧亚问题”","authors":"Liesbeth Rosen Jacobson","doi":"10.3167/trans.2018.080306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the arrangements that authorities put in place for populations\nof mixed ancestry from two former colonies in Asia—the Dutch East\nIndies and British India—and compares them with those of French Indochina\nduring decolonization. These people of mixed ancestry, or “Eurasians,” as they\nwere commonly called at the time, were a heterogeneous group. Some could\npass themselves off as Europeans, while others were seen as indigenous people.\nThe arrangements were negotiated during round table conferences, at\nwhich decolonization in all three colonies was prepared. Which agreements\nwere made, what consequences did they have, and how and why did these differ\nacross the three colonial contexts? To answer these questions, I use material\nfrom governmental archives from all three former colonial contexts. The\narticle shows that information on the paternal ancestry of Eurasians was decisive\nin the allocation of European citizenship and admission to the colonizing\ncountry.","PeriodicalId":43789,"journal":{"name":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “Eurasian Question”\",\"authors\":\"Liesbeth Rosen Jacobson\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/trans.2018.080306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the arrangements that authorities put in place for populations\\nof mixed ancestry from two former colonies in Asia—the Dutch East\\nIndies and British India—and compares them with those of French Indochina\\nduring decolonization. These people of mixed ancestry, or “Eurasians,” as they\\nwere commonly called at the time, were a heterogeneous group. Some could\\npass themselves off as Europeans, while others were seen as indigenous people.\\nThe arrangements were negotiated during round table conferences, at\\nwhich decolonization in all three colonies was prepared. Which agreements\\nwere made, what consequences did they have, and how and why did these differ\\nacross the three colonial contexts? To answer these questions, I use material\\nfrom governmental archives from all three former colonial contexts. The\\narticle shows that information on the paternal ancestry of Eurasians was decisive\\nin the allocation of European citizenship and admission to the colonizing\\ncountry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/trans.2018.080306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/trans.2018.080306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这些有着混合血统的人,或者当时通常被称为“欧亚人”,是一个异质群体。一些人可以冒充欧洲人,而另一些人则被视为土著人。这些安排是在圆桌会议期间谈判的,在圆桌会议上为所有三个殖民地的非殖民化做了准备。达成了哪些协议,这些协议产生了什么后果,这些协议在三个殖民背景下是如何以及为什么不同的?为了回答这些问题,我使用了三个前殖民地背景下的政府档案材料。这篇文章表明,欧亚人的父系祖先信息决定了欧洲公民身份的分配和殖民国家的准入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The “Eurasian Question”
This article examines the arrangements that authorities put in place for populations of mixed ancestry from two former colonies in Asia—the Dutch East Indies and British India—and compares them with those of French Indochina during decolonization. These people of mixed ancestry, or “Eurasians,” as they were commonly called at the time, were a heterogeneous group. Some could pass themselves off as Europeans, while others were seen as indigenous people. The arrangements were negotiated during round table conferences, at which decolonization in all three colonies was prepared. Which agreements were made, what consequences did they have, and how and why did these differ across the three colonial contexts? To answer these questions, I use material from governmental archives from all three former colonial contexts. The article shows that information on the paternal ancestry of Eurasians was decisive in the allocation of European citizenship and admission to the colonizing country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual and Toponymical Landscape Dreams and Parables of Sustainable Mobilities Migrating Landscapes Absence, Presence, and Mobility English Wetland Immersions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1