减轻知识管理内部和外部风险因素:最佳实践的文献综述

Tori Reddy Dodla, Laura A. Jones
{"title":"减轻知识管理内部和外部风险因素:最佳实践的文献综述","authors":"Tori Reddy Dodla, Laura A. Jones","doi":"10.2478/bsaft-2023-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Used to store, manage, and leverage information, knowledge management systems are becoming increasingly valuable assets within organizations. Organizations must manage knowledge internally (through knowledge risks) and externally (through reputational risks). We define knowledge risks as internal human, technological, and organizational factors, and reputational risks as the effects of knowledge risks and external perils to reputation, credibility, financial status, and future success. An oversight of either risk type can cause significant damage to an organization. This literature review was a means to analyze, categorize, and offer best practices for mitigating risks within a knowledge management system.","PeriodicalId":36159,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitigating Knowledge Management Internal and External Risk Factors: A Literature Review of Best Practices\",\"authors\":\"Tori Reddy Dodla, Laura A. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/bsaft-2023-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Used to store, manage, and leverage information, knowledge management systems are becoming increasingly valuable assets within organizations. Organizations must manage knowledge internally (through knowledge risks) and externally (through reputational risks). We define knowledge risks as internal human, technological, and organizational factors, and reputational risks as the effects of knowledge risks and external perils to reputation, credibility, financial status, and future success. An oversight of either risk type can cause significant damage to an organization. This literature review was a means to analyze, categorize, and offer best practices for mitigating risks within a knowledge management system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/bsaft-2023-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bsaft-2023-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于存储、管理和利用信息的知识管理系统正在成为组织中越来越有价值的资产。组织必须在内部(通过知识风险)和外部(通过声誉风险)管理知识。我们将知识风险定义为内部的人力、技术和组织因素,将声誉风险定义为知识风险和外部风险对声誉、可信度、财务状况和未来成功的影响。对任何一种风险类型的疏忽都可能对组织造成重大损害。这篇文献综述是一种分析、分类和提供在知识管理系统中降低风险的最佳实践的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mitigating Knowledge Management Internal and External Risk Factors: A Literature Review of Best Practices
Abstract Used to store, manage, and leverage information, knowledge management systems are becoming increasingly valuable assets within organizations. Organizations must manage knowledge internally (through knowledge risks) and externally (through reputational risks). We define knowledge risks as internal human, technological, and organizational factors, and reputational risks as the effects of knowledge risks and external perils to reputation, credibility, financial status, and future success. An oversight of either risk type can cause significant damage to an organization. This literature review was a means to analyze, categorize, and offer best practices for mitigating risks within a knowledge management system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy
Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy Engineering-Ocean Engineering
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
RESOLVING PARADOXES OF PHYSICS IN THE UNIVERSITY STUDY SOME THEORETICAL AND APPLIED PROBLEMS OF VERBS WITH BORROWINGS OF ARABIC ORIGIN EFFECTIVENESS OF ONLINE EDUCATION OF FUTURE DOCTORS IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING PHYSIOLOGY FREE VIBRATIONS OF THIN ELASTIC ORTHOTROPIC CYLINDRICAL PANEL WITH RIGID – CLAMPED EDGE GENERATOR THE PROBLEM OF CLASSIFICATION OF STYLES IN THE ARMENIAN STYLIST STUDIES (FROM THE 1950S TO THE PRESENT DAY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1