巴伦支海南部沿海地区春季浮游动物生产力

Q4 Environmental Science Marine Biological Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.21072/mbj.2020.05.4.01
V. Dvoretsky, A. Dvoretsky
{"title":"巴伦支海南部沿海地区春季浮游动物生产力","authors":"V. Dvoretsky, A. Dvoretsky","doi":"10.21072/mbj.2020.05.4.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of the analysis of zooplankton assemblage state of the southern Barents Sea are presented. Zooplankton samples were collected during the cruise of the RV “Dalnie Zelentsy” in May 2016. Hydrological conditions were typical for Murmansk coastal water this season. A total of 47 zooplankton taxa were identified. Taxa number varied between stations, ranging 18–29, with copepods being a dominant group in zooplankton. The most frequent ones were Calanus finmarchicus, Metridia longa, Metridia lucens, Microcalanus spp., Oithona atlantica, Oithona similis, Pseudocalanus spp., copepod nauplii and ova, as well as cladoceran Evadne nordmanni, larvae of Echinodermata and Polychaeta, chaetognath Parasagitta elegans, and early stages of the euphausiids of the genus Thysanoessa. In populations of common copepod species Pseudocalanus spp. and Oithona similis, early age stages dominated, which indicated their continued reproduction. Total zooplankton abundance ranged from 748 to 6576 ind.·m−3, averaging 3012. Total zooplankton biomass varied from 17 to 157 mg of dry mass per m³, with a mean value of 83. The data obtained were comparable to those registered in Murmansk coastal water in July 2008 and were higher than those in August 2007. The authors suggest that it might be related to the differences in sampling seasons and hydrological conditions. Daily zooplankton production was estimated to be 0.49–4.04 mg of dry mass per m³, averaging (2.17 ± 0.17). These estimates were about twice as high as mean values, registered in Murmansk coastal water during summer period. This seems to be due to higher phytoplankton concentrations in spring. Total zooplankton stock for water area studied (25.8 thousand km²) was estimated to be 425,000 thousand tons of dry mass. Cluster analysis revealed four groups of stations that differ in relative abundance of Calanus finmarchicus, Copepoda nauplii, Oithona similis, larvae of Echinodermata, and appendicularian Fritillaria borealis. Spatial variation of zooplankton abundance was closely related to station location (latitude, longitude, and sampling depth), as well as bottom layer temperature and mean salinity at the station.","PeriodicalId":18191,"journal":{"name":"Marine Biological Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zooplankton productivity in the coastal area of the southern Barents Sea in spring\",\"authors\":\"V. Dvoretsky, A. Dvoretsky\",\"doi\":\"10.21072/mbj.2020.05.4.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results of the analysis of zooplankton assemblage state of the southern Barents Sea are presented. Zooplankton samples were collected during the cruise of the RV “Dalnie Zelentsy” in May 2016. Hydrological conditions were typical for Murmansk coastal water this season. A total of 47 zooplankton taxa were identified. Taxa number varied between stations, ranging 18–29, with copepods being a dominant group in zooplankton. The most frequent ones were Calanus finmarchicus, Metridia longa, Metridia lucens, Microcalanus spp., Oithona atlantica, Oithona similis, Pseudocalanus spp., copepod nauplii and ova, as well as cladoceran Evadne nordmanni, larvae of Echinodermata and Polychaeta, chaetognath Parasagitta elegans, and early stages of the euphausiids of the genus Thysanoessa. In populations of common copepod species Pseudocalanus spp. and Oithona similis, early age stages dominated, which indicated their continued reproduction. Total zooplankton abundance ranged from 748 to 6576 ind.·m−3, averaging 3012. Total zooplankton biomass varied from 17 to 157 mg of dry mass per m³, with a mean value of 83. The data obtained were comparable to those registered in Murmansk coastal water in July 2008 and were higher than those in August 2007. The authors suggest that it might be related to the differences in sampling seasons and hydrological conditions. Daily zooplankton production was estimated to be 0.49–4.04 mg of dry mass per m³, averaging (2.17 ± 0.17). These estimates were about twice as high as mean values, registered in Murmansk coastal water during summer period. This seems to be due to higher phytoplankton concentrations in spring. Total zooplankton stock for water area studied (25.8 thousand km²) was estimated to be 425,000 thousand tons of dry mass. Cluster analysis revealed four groups of stations that differ in relative abundance of Calanus finmarchicus, Copepoda nauplii, Oithona similis, larvae of Echinodermata, and appendicularian Fritillaria borealis. Spatial variation of zooplankton abundance was closely related to station location (latitude, longitude, and sampling depth), as well as bottom layer temperature and mean salinity at the station.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Biological Journal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Biological Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21072/mbj.2020.05.4.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Biological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21072/mbj.2020.05.4.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了巴伦支海南部浮游动物群落状况的分析结果。2016年5月,在“Dalnie Zelentsy”号RV巡航期间收集了浮游动物样本。这个季节摩尔曼斯克沿岸水域的水文条件是典型的。共鉴定出47个浮游动物类群。各监测站的分类群数量在18 ~ 29个之间,桡足类是浮游动物的优势类群。其中最常见的有finmarchicus Calanus、Metridia longa、Metridia lucens、Microcalanus spp、Oithona atlantica、Oithona similis、pseudoalanus spp、nauplii桡足类和卵,以及枝海目Evadne nordmanni、棘皮目和多毛纲幼虫、毛纲线虫、Parasagitta elegans和Thysanoessa属的早期阶段的epahausiids。在常见桡足类物种pseudoalanus spp.和Oithona similis的种群中,早期阶段占主导地位,表明它们的繁殖仍在继续。浮游动物总丰度为748 ~ 6576 ind.·m−3,平均为3012 ind.·m−3。浮游动物总生物量在17 ~ 157 mg干质量/ m³之间变化,平均值为83。获得的数据与2008年7月在摩尔曼斯克沿海水域登记的数据相当,高于2007年8月的数据。作者认为,这可能与采样季节和水文条件的差异有关。据估计,每日浮游动物产量为0.49-4.04 mg干质量/ m³,平均为(2.17±0.17)。这些估计值大约是夏季在摩尔曼斯克沿海水域记录的平均值的两倍。这似乎是由于春季浮游植物浓度较高。研究水域(25.8万平方公里)的浮游动物总存量估计为42.5万吨干质量。聚类分析结果显示,四组站点的相对丰度存在差异,分别为finmarchicus、Copepoda nauplii、Oithona similis、棘皮虫幼虫和尾虫贝母。浮游动物丰度的空间变化与站点位置(纬度、经度、采样深度)、站点底层温度和平均盐度密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zooplankton productivity in the coastal area of the southern Barents Sea in spring
The results of the analysis of zooplankton assemblage state of the southern Barents Sea are presented. Zooplankton samples were collected during the cruise of the RV “Dalnie Zelentsy” in May 2016. Hydrological conditions were typical for Murmansk coastal water this season. A total of 47 zooplankton taxa were identified. Taxa number varied between stations, ranging 18–29, with copepods being a dominant group in zooplankton. The most frequent ones were Calanus finmarchicus, Metridia longa, Metridia lucens, Microcalanus spp., Oithona atlantica, Oithona similis, Pseudocalanus spp., copepod nauplii and ova, as well as cladoceran Evadne nordmanni, larvae of Echinodermata and Polychaeta, chaetognath Parasagitta elegans, and early stages of the euphausiids of the genus Thysanoessa. In populations of common copepod species Pseudocalanus spp. and Oithona similis, early age stages dominated, which indicated their continued reproduction. Total zooplankton abundance ranged from 748 to 6576 ind.·m−3, averaging 3012. Total zooplankton biomass varied from 17 to 157 mg of dry mass per m³, with a mean value of 83. The data obtained were comparable to those registered in Murmansk coastal water in July 2008 and were higher than those in August 2007. The authors suggest that it might be related to the differences in sampling seasons and hydrological conditions. Daily zooplankton production was estimated to be 0.49–4.04 mg of dry mass per m³, averaging (2.17 ± 0.17). These estimates were about twice as high as mean values, registered in Murmansk coastal water during summer period. This seems to be due to higher phytoplankton concentrations in spring. Total zooplankton stock for water area studied (25.8 thousand km²) was estimated to be 425,000 thousand tons of dry mass. Cluster analysis revealed four groups of stations that differ in relative abundance of Calanus finmarchicus, Copepoda nauplii, Oithona similis, larvae of Echinodermata, and appendicularian Fritillaria borealis. Spatial variation of zooplankton abundance was closely related to station location (latitude, longitude, and sampling depth), as well as bottom layer temperature and mean salinity at the station.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Biological Journal
Marine Biological Journal Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Таксономический состав и сезонная динамика меропланктона в районе морского порта Кавказ, Керченский пролив Здоровье экосистем: понятие, методологические подходы, критерии оценки Количественная структура сообщества микроводорослей морского льда (остров Русский, залив Петра Великого, Японское море) Ревизия макрофитобентоса заповедного территориально-аквального комплекса Бакальской косы (Чёрное море) Рост криптофитовой микроводоросли Rhodomonas salina (Wislouch) D. R. A. Hill & R. Wetherbee, 1989 при разных условиях культивирования
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1