{"title":"本体和知识图的属性断言约束","authors":"H. Dibowski","doi":"10.1108/dta-05-2022-0209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe curation of ontologies and knowledge graphs (KGs) is an essential task for industrial knowledge-based applications, as they rely on the contained knowledge to be correct and error-free. Often, a significant amount of a KG is curated by humans. Established validation methods, such as Shapes Constraint Language, Shape Expressions or Web Ontology Language, can detect wrong statements only after their materialization, which can be too late. Instead, an approach that avoids errors and adequately supports users is required.Design/methodology/approachFor solving that problem, Property Assertion Constraints (PACs) have been developed. PACs extend the range definition of a property with additional logic expressed with SPARQL. For the context of a given instance and property, a tailored PAC query is dynamically built and triggered on the KG. It can determine all values that will result in valid property value assertions.FindingsPACs can avoid the expansion of KGs with invalid property value assertions effectively, as their contained expertise narrows down the valid options a user can choose from. This simplifies the knowledge curation and, most notably, relieves users or machines from knowing and applying this expertise, but instead enables a computer to take care of it.Originality/valuePACs are fundamentally different from existing approaches. Instead of detecting erroneous materialized facts, they can determine all semantically correct assertions before materializing them. This avoids invalid property value assertions and provides users an informed, purposeful assistance. To the author's knowledge, PACs are the only such approach.","PeriodicalId":56156,"journal":{"name":"Data Technologies and Applications","volume":"12 1","pages":"157-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Property Assertion Constraints for ontologies and knowledge graphs\",\"authors\":\"H. Dibowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dta-05-2022-0209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe curation of ontologies and knowledge graphs (KGs) is an essential task for industrial knowledge-based applications, as they rely on the contained knowledge to be correct and error-free. Often, a significant amount of a KG is curated by humans. Established validation methods, such as Shapes Constraint Language, Shape Expressions or Web Ontology Language, can detect wrong statements only after their materialization, which can be too late. Instead, an approach that avoids errors and adequately supports users is required.Design/methodology/approachFor solving that problem, Property Assertion Constraints (PACs) have been developed. PACs extend the range definition of a property with additional logic expressed with SPARQL. For the context of a given instance and property, a tailored PAC query is dynamically built and triggered on the KG. It can determine all values that will result in valid property value assertions.FindingsPACs can avoid the expansion of KGs with invalid property value assertions effectively, as their contained expertise narrows down the valid options a user can choose from. This simplifies the knowledge curation and, most notably, relieves users or machines from knowing and applying this expertise, but instead enables a computer to take care of it.Originality/valuePACs are fundamentally different from existing approaches. Instead of detecting erroneous materialized facts, they can determine all semantically correct assertions before materializing them. This avoids invalid property value assertions and provides users an informed, purposeful assistance. To the author's knowledge, PACs are the only such approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data Technologies and Applications\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"157-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data Technologies and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-05-2022-0209\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Technologies and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-05-2022-0209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Property Assertion Constraints for ontologies and knowledge graphs
PurposeThe curation of ontologies and knowledge graphs (KGs) is an essential task for industrial knowledge-based applications, as they rely on the contained knowledge to be correct and error-free. Often, a significant amount of a KG is curated by humans. Established validation methods, such as Shapes Constraint Language, Shape Expressions or Web Ontology Language, can detect wrong statements only after their materialization, which can be too late. Instead, an approach that avoids errors and adequately supports users is required.Design/methodology/approachFor solving that problem, Property Assertion Constraints (PACs) have been developed. PACs extend the range definition of a property with additional logic expressed with SPARQL. For the context of a given instance and property, a tailored PAC query is dynamically built and triggered on the KG. It can determine all values that will result in valid property value assertions.FindingsPACs can avoid the expansion of KGs with invalid property value assertions effectively, as their contained expertise narrows down the valid options a user can choose from. This simplifies the knowledge curation and, most notably, relieves users or machines from knowing and applying this expertise, but instead enables a computer to take care of it.Originality/valuePACs are fundamentally different from existing approaches. Instead of detecting erroneous materialized facts, they can determine all semantically correct assertions before materializing them. This avoids invalid property value assertions and provides users an informed, purposeful assistance. To the author's knowledge, PACs are the only such approach.