检验在线新闻使用的预测因素:传统媒体的感知偏见和对党派新闻的偏好

Woohyun Yoo, Donghee Don Shin
{"title":"检验在线新闻使用的预测因素:传统媒体的感知偏见和对党派新闻的偏好","authors":"Woohyun Yoo, Donghee Don Shin","doi":"10.1108/INFO-03-2016-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this study is to examine, in the context of online news use, the predictive values of two factors: perceived bias in traditional media and preference for partisan news. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThis study used data collected as part of the Pew Internet and American Life Project between December 28, 2009, and January 19, 2010. The data were analyzed using linear regression analysis. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe findings provide evidence of the values of two potentially significant predictors of online news use: a perception of bias in traditional media and preference for partisan news. In addition, higher levels of political partisanship were shown to intensify the positive effect of perceived bias in traditional media on online news use in new media outlets, reinforcing the impact of preference for partisan news on participatory online news use. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nDepending on individual decisions, the internet can either help to empower deliberative democracy (where diverse and different voices coexist) or lead to an extremely polarized society. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nWith the explosive growth of the internet as a news source, media scholars have explored the factors that encourage people to rely on the internet for news and information. Nevertheless, certain attributes of online news consumption originating from individual attitudes about and perceptions of the media environment remain underspecified. This research helps advance an understanding of the types of people who seek news online and how they use various sources.","PeriodicalId":88488,"journal":{"name":"Fruhneuzeit-Info","volume":"18 1","pages":"59-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining predictors of online news use: perceived bias in traditional media and preference for partisan news\",\"authors\":\"Woohyun Yoo, Donghee Don Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/INFO-03-2016-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe purpose of this study is to examine, in the context of online news use, the predictive values of two factors: perceived bias in traditional media and preference for partisan news. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThis study used data collected as part of the Pew Internet and American Life Project between December 28, 2009, and January 19, 2010. The data were analyzed using linear regression analysis. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFindings \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe findings provide evidence of the values of two potentially significant predictors of online news use: a perception of bias in traditional media and preference for partisan news. In addition, higher levels of political partisanship were shown to intensify the positive effect of perceived bias in traditional media on online news use in new media outlets, reinforcing the impact of preference for partisan news on participatory online news use. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nResearch limitations/implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nDepending on individual decisions, the internet can either help to empower deliberative democracy (where diverse and different voices coexist) or lead to an extremely polarized society. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nOriginality/value \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nWith the explosive growth of the internet as a news source, media scholars have explored the factors that encourage people to rely on the internet for news and information. Nevertheless, certain attributes of online news consumption originating from individual attitudes about and perceptions of the media environment remain underspecified. This research helps advance an understanding of the types of people who seek news online and how they use various sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fruhneuzeit-Info\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"59-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fruhneuzeit-Info\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/INFO-03-2016-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fruhneuzeit-Info","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/INFO-03-2016-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是检验在网络新闻使用的背景下,两个因素的预测价值:传统媒体的感知偏见和对党派新闻的偏好。设计/方法/方法本研究使用了2009年12月28日至2010年1月19日期间作为皮尤互联网和美国生活项目一部分收集的数据。数据采用线性回归分析。研究结果为在线新闻使用的两个潜在重要预测因素的价值提供了证据:对传统媒体偏见的感知和对党派新闻的偏好。此外,更高水平的政治党派关系被证明会强化传统媒体中感知到的偏见对新媒体在线新闻使用的积极影响,从而强化党派新闻偏好对参与式在线新闻使用的影响。根据个人的决定,互联网要么有助于加强协商民主(多种不同的声音共存),要么导致一个极端两极化的社会。随着互联网作为新闻来源的爆炸式增长,媒体学者探索了促使人们依赖互联网获取新闻和信息的因素。然而,源于个人对媒体环境的态度和看法的在线新闻消费的某些属性仍然没有得到充分说明。这项研究有助于进一步了解在网上寻找新闻的人的类型以及他们如何使用各种来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining predictors of online news use: perceived bias in traditional media and preference for partisan news
Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine, in the context of online news use, the predictive values of two factors: perceived bias in traditional media and preference for partisan news. Design/methodology/approach This study used data collected as part of the Pew Internet and American Life Project between December 28, 2009, and January 19, 2010. The data were analyzed using linear regression analysis. Findings The findings provide evidence of the values of two potentially significant predictors of online news use: a perception of bias in traditional media and preference for partisan news. In addition, higher levels of political partisanship were shown to intensify the positive effect of perceived bias in traditional media on online news use in new media outlets, reinforcing the impact of preference for partisan news on participatory online news use. Research limitations/implications Depending on individual decisions, the internet can either help to empower deliberative democracy (where diverse and different voices coexist) or lead to an extremely polarized society. Originality/value With the explosive growth of the internet as a news source, media scholars have explored the factors that encourage people to rely on the internet for news and information. Nevertheless, certain attributes of online news consumption originating from individual attitudes about and perceptions of the media environment remain underspecified. This research helps advance an understanding of the types of people who seek news online and how they use various sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Another breach in the wall: copyright territoriality in Europe and its progressive erosion on the grounds of competition law Content creation and distribution in the digital single market User generated content – users, community of users and firms: toward new sources of co-innovation? Shrinking core? Exploring the differential agenda setting power of traditional and personalized news media Copyright (and) Culture: the governance of audiovisual archives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1