教师注重实践形成性评估技术和布鲁姆斯分类法:未来教师课堂实践的评估

S. Bashir, Tanzila Karim, Nadia Akram
{"title":"教师注重实践形成性评估技术和布鲁姆斯分类法:未来教师课堂实践的评估","authors":"S. Bashir, Tanzila Karim, Nadia Akram","doi":"10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(116-125)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The key objective of the study was to find out the formative assessment techniques used by teachers of a public sector university of Lahore city. To achieve this objective a B.Ed. (Hons) class comprising 40 prospective teachers and five teachers involved in teaching were purposively selected. Data was collected by developing two instruments: An observation schedule and a questionnaire. To ensure the reliability of observation, inter observer agreement was followed and reliability coefficient of questionnaire was identified as 0.839. Six observations of each teacher were calculated. Data was analyzed by using SPSS software. Findings of study showed that teachers usually ask questions and give examples in classroom and the other techniques to assess students’ learning are generally ignored. Teachers assess lower cognitive abilities of students in the classroom. The study suggests that teachers need training for the use of assessment techniques in their classes.","PeriodicalId":53031,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arts and Social Sciences","volume":"56 1","pages":"116-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers focus to practice formative assessment techniques and Blooms Taxonomy: Assessment of class practices of prospective teachers\",\"authors\":\"S. Bashir, Tanzila Karim, Nadia Akram\",\"doi\":\"10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(116-125)\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The key objective of the study was to find out the formative assessment techniques used by teachers of a public sector university of Lahore city. To achieve this objective a B.Ed. (Hons) class comprising 40 prospective teachers and five teachers involved in teaching were purposively selected. Data was collected by developing two instruments: An observation schedule and a questionnaire. To ensure the reliability of observation, inter observer agreement was followed and reliability coefficient of questionnaire was identified as 0.839. Six observations of each teacher were calculated. Data was analyzed by using SPSS software. Findings of study showed that teachers usually ask questions and give examples in classroom and the other techniques to assess students’ learning are generally ignored. Teachers assess lower cognitive abilities of students in the classroom. The study suggests that teachers need training for the use of assessment techniques in their classes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arts and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"116-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arts and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(116-125)\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arts and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(116-125)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是找出拉合尔市一所公立大学教师使用的形成性评估技术。为了实现这一目标,有目的地选择了一个由40名未来教师和5名参与教学的教师组成的荣誉学士班。数据通过两种工具收集:观察表和问卷调查。为保证观察结果的信度,遵循观察者间一致性,确定问卷信度系数为0.839。计算每位教师的6个观察值。数据采用SPSS软件进行分析。研究结果表明,教师通常在课堂上提问和举例,而其他评估学生学习的方法通常被忽视。教师在课堂上评估较低认知能力的学生。该研究表明,教师需要在课堂上使用评估技术的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teachers focus to practice formative assessment techniques and Blooms Taxonomy: Assessment of class practices of prospective teachers
The key objective of the study was to find out the formative assessment techniques used by teachers of a public sector university of Lahore city. To achieve this objective a B.Ed. (Hons) class comprising 40 prospective teachers and five teachers involved in teaching were purposively selected. Data was collected by developing two instruments: An observation schedule and a questionnaire. To ensure the reliability of observation, inter observer agreement was followed and reliability coefficient of questionnaire was identified as 0.839. Six observations of each teacher were calculated. Data was analyzed by using SPSS software. Findings of study showed that teachers usually ask questions and give examples in classroom and the other techniques to assess students’ learning are generally ignored. Teachers assess lower cognitive abilities of students in the classroom. The study suggests that teachers need training for the use of assessment techniques in their classes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
ظاهرة الطلاق في منطقة حائل بالمملكة العربية السعودية " الأسباب والآثار والحلول" "التحليل التمييزي للرضا الطلابي عن خدمات جامعة عجمان بدولة الامارات العربية المتحدة" دراسة ميدانية دَور الحَملات الاتصالية للعلاقاتُ العامةُ فِي مُديريةِ الأمنِ العام الأردني فِي التَوعية بِخَطر المُخدِرات اللُّغة الشِّعرية وعلاقتها بالمعنى النَّصِّيِّ من خلال القول بالضَّرورة لدى ابن الشَّجريِّ توظيف هيئة صحة دبي لمنصة الإنستغرام للتوعية بجائحة كرونا: دراسة تحليلية
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1