书评:《设计社交:解密社交媒体设计与身份》,作者:Harry T. Dyer

Sonia Kumari
{"title":"书评:《设计社交:解密社交媒体设计与身份》,作者:Harry T. Dyer","authors":"Sonia Kumari","doi":"10.1177/10776958221107986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"objectivity” and its capacity to displace “outdated” journalistic goals of obtaining unassailable facts from reporters without motives of their own. As Mister Rogers (and Aristotle) might put it, we forget at our peril that emotions drive actions. As Painter and Wilkins demonstrate throughout, a plunge into pop culture combined with a working knowledge of virtue ethics produces nearly endless—and endlessly appealing—thought experiments to show why humans must never respond mechanically to ethical dilemmas. Painter and Williams stop short of prescribing specific lessons distilled from the pop culture portrayals they examine; readers seeking theory-based revisions to existing codes of professional conduct must look elsewhere. Instead students and scholars are urged to continue the work of probing the power of fiction to teach morality (172). It is a worthy goal, discerning how a society’s popular culture subtly but steadily instructs us to be altruistic and transparent, benevolent, and fair. Exploration almost surely will involve difficult dialogue that demands candor and grace. In an era when faculty and students alike report increasing reticence to debate freely for fear of reputation-canceling reprisal, how many of us will follow where Painter and Wilkins lead? As Emma Camp, University of Virginia student journalist, has observed, too many students holding minority opinions now claim to “self-censor” rather than risk friendlessness or low grades (The New York Times, March 7, 2022). “Our universities cannot change our social interactions,” Camp writes, adding that what campuses can insist on are policies that protect expression—perhaps needed most when the topic turns to learning to be good.","PeriodicalId":37361,"journal":{"name":"Journalism and Mass Communication Educator","volume":"23 1","pages":"439 - 441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Designing the Social: Unpacking Social Media Design and Identity, by Harry T. Dyer\",\"authors\":\"Sonia Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10776958221107986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"objectivity” and its capacity to displace “outdated” journalistic goals of obtaining unassailable facts from reporters without motives of their own. As Mister Rogers (and Aristotle) might put it, we forget at our peril that emotions drive actions. As Painter and Wilkins demonstrate throughout, a plunge into pop culture combined with a working knowledge of virtue ethics produces nearly endless—and endlessly appealing—thought experiments to show why humans must never respond mechanically to ethical dilemmas. Painter and Williams stop short of prescribing specific lessons distilled from the pop culture portrayals they examine; readers seeking theory-based revisions to existing codes of professional conduct must look elsewhere. Instead students and scholars are urged to continue the work of probing the power of fiction to teach morality (172). It is a worthy goal, discerning how a society’s popular culture subtly but steadily instructs us to be altruistic and transparent, benevolent, and fair. Exploration almost surely will involve difficult dialogue that demands candor and grace. In an era when faculty and students alike report increasing reticence to debate freely for fear of reputation-canceling reprisal, how many of us will follow where Painter and Wilkins lead? As Emma Camp, University of Virginia student journalist, has observed, too many students holding minority opinions now claim to “self-censor” rather than risk friendlessness or low grades (The New York Times, March 7, 2022). “Our universities cannot change our social interactions,” Camp writes, adding that what campuses can insist on are policies that protect expression—perhaps needed most when the topic turns to learning to be good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journalism and Mass Communication Educator\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"439 - 441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journalism and Mass Communication Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221107986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism and Mass Communication Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221107986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“客观性”及其取代“过时”的新闻目标的能力,即从没有自己动机的记者那里获得无懈可击的事实。正如罗杰斯先生(以及亚里士多德)可能会说的那样,我们忘记了情绪驱动行动的危险。正如佩因特和威尔金斯在书中所展示的那样,对流行文化的投入与对美德伦理的实用知识相结合,产生了几乎无穷无尽的——无穷无尽的——有吸引力的思想实验,以表明为什么人类永远不能机械地回应道德困境。佩因特和威廉姆斯没有从他们研究的流行文化描绘中总结出具体的教训;想要对现有的职业行为准则进行基于理论的修订的读者,必须去别处看看。相反,学生和学者们被敦促继续探索小说在道德教育方面的力量。这是一个有价值的目标,它能辨别出一个社会的流行文化是如何微妙而稳定地教导我们要无私、透明、仁慈和公平。探索几乎肯定会涉及需要坦诚和优雅的艰难对话。在一个教师和学生都表示越来越不愿自由辩论的时代,因为害怕名誉受损的报复,我们中有多少人会追随佩因特和威尔金斯的脚步?正如弗吉尼亚大学学生记者艾玛·坎普(Emma Camp)所观察到的那样,现在有太多持有少数意见的学生声称要“自我审查”,而不是冒着失去朋友或成绩不佳的风险。“我们的大学不能改变我们的社会互动,”坎普写道,并补充说,校园可以坚持的是保护表达的政策——当话题转向向好学习时,这可能是最需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Designing the Social: Unpacking Social Media Design and Identity, by Harry T. Dyer
objectivity” and its capacity to displace “outdated” journalistic goals of obtaining unassailable facts from reporters without motives of their own. As Mister Rogers (and Aristotle) might put it, we forget at our peril that emotions drive actions. As Painter and Wilkins demonstrate throughout, a plunge into pop culture combined with a working knowledge of virtue ethics produces nearly endless—and endlessly appealing—thought experiments to show why humans must never respond mechanically to ethical dilemmas. Painter and Williams stop short of prescribing specific lessons distilled from the pop culture portrayals they examine; readers seeking theory-based revisions to existing codes of professional conduct must look elsewhere. Instead students and scholars are urged to continue the work of probing the power of fiction to teach morality (172). It is a worthy goal, discerning how a society’s popular culture subtly but steadily instructs us to be altruistic and transparent, benevolent, and fair. Exploration almost surely will involve difficult dialogue that demands candor and grace. In an era when faculty and students alike report increasing reticence to debate freely for fear of reputation-canceling reprisal, how many of us will follow where Painter and Wilkins lead? As Emma Camp, University of Virginia student journalist, has observed, too many students holding minority opinions now claim to “self-censor” rather than risk friendlessness or low grades (The New York Times, March 7, 2022). “Our universities cannot change our social interactions,” Camp writes, adding that what campuses can insist on are policies that protect expression—perhaps needed most when the topic turns to learning to be good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journalism and Mass Communication Educator
Journalism and Mass Communication Educator Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Established in 1944, Journalism & Mass Communication Educator (JMCE) addresses the professional needs of the journalism and mass communication educator and administrator on both collegiate and secondary levels. Publishing quarterly, JMCE is the largest, highest circulation, and oldest of any scholarly journal in the world devoted to education in journalism, public relations, advertising, mass communication, media studies and related fields. Featured articles include: • teaching techniques • new courses and technology to help promote excellence in the classroom • statistical information on student enrollments and career interests • trends in curriculum design • surveys and opinion polls
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Making Media Matter: Critical Literacy, Popular Culture, and Creative Production, by Benjamin Thevenin Book Review: Entertaining Ethics: Lessons in Media Ethics From Popular Culture, by Chad Painter and Lee Wilkins and Media Law Through Science Fiction: Do Androids Dream of Electric Free Speech?, by Daxton R. Stewart The Potential for Public Impact in a J Department’s Local Information Ecosystem: Key Ingredients for Starting a Journalism Teaching Hospital From Entertainment to Empowerment: A Call for Social Media Literacy Education at an HBCU Politics, Press, and the Pandemic: Analyzing the Effectiveness of a Student Journalism Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1