基于效用优化的多利益相关者个性化推荐系统

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Data Technologies and Applications Pub Date : 2022-04-15 DOI:10.1108/dta-07-2021-0182
Rahul Shrivastava, Dilip Singh Sisodia, N. K. Nagwani
{"title":"基于效用优化的多利益相关者个性化推荐系统","authors":"Rahul Shrivastava, Dilip Singh Sisodia, N. K. Nagwani","doi":"10.1108/dta-07-2021-0182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn a multi-stakeholder recommender system (MSRS), stakeholders are the multiple entities (consumer, producer, system, etc.) benefited by the generated recommendations. Traditionally, the exclusive focus on only a single stakeholders' (for example, only consumer or end-user) preferences obscured the welfare of the others. Two major challenges are encountered while incorporating the multiple stakeholders' perspectives in MSRS: designing a dedicated utility function for each stakeholder and optimizing their utility without hurting others. This paper proposes multiple utility functions for different stakeholders and optimizes these functions for generating balanced, personalized recommendations for each stakeholder.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed methodology considers four valid stakeholders user, producer, cast and recommender system from the multi-stakeholder recommender setting and builds dedicated utility functions. The utility function for users incorporates enhanced side-information-based similarity computation for utility count. Similarly, to improve the utility gain, the authors design new utility functions for producer, star-cast and system to incorporate long-tail and diverse items in the recommendation list. Next, to balance the utility gain and generate the trade-off recommendation solution, the authors perform the evolutionary optimization of the conflicting utility functions using NSGA-II. Experimental evaluation and comparison are conducted over three benchmark data sets.FindingsThe authors observed 19.70% of average enhancement in utility gain with improved mean precision, diversity and novelty. Exposure, hit, reach and target reach metrics are substantially improved.Originality/valueA new approach considers four stakeholders simultaneously with their respective utility functions and establishes the trade-off recommendation solution between conflicting utilities of the stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":56156,"journal":{"name":"Data Technologies and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility optimization-based multi-stakeholder personalized recommendation system\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Shrivastava, Dilip Singh Sisodia, N. K. Nagwani\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dta-07-2021-0182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeIn a multi-stakeholder recommender system (MSRS), stakeholders are the multiple entities (consumer, producer, system, etc.) benefited by the generated recommendations. Traditionally, the exclusive focus on only a single stakeholders' (for example, only consumer or end-user) preferences obscured the welfare of the others. Two major challenges are encountered while incorporating the multiple stakeholders' perspectives in MSRS: designing a dedicated utility function for each stakeholder and optimizing their utility without hurting others. This paper proposes multiple utility functions for different stakeholders and optimizes these functions for generating balanced, personalized recommendations for each stakeholder.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed methodology considers four valid stakeholders user, producer, cast and recommender system from the multi-stakeholder recommender setting and builds dedicated utility functions. The utility function for users incorporates enhanced side-information-based similarity computation for utility count. Similarly, to improve the utility gain, the authors design new utility functions for producer, star-cast and system to incorporate long-tail and diverse items in the recommendation list. Next, to balance the utility gain and generate the trade-off recommendation solution, the authors perform the evolutionary optimization of the conflicting utility functions using NSGA-II. Experimental evaluation and comparison are conducted over three benchmark data sets.FindingsThe authors observed 19.70% of average enhancement in utility gain with improved mean precision, diversity and novelty. Exposure, hit, reach and target reach metrics are substantially improved.Originality/valueA new approach considers four stakeholders simultaneously with their respective utility functions and establishes the trade-off recommendation solution between conflicting utilities of the stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data Technologies and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data Technologies and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-07-2021-0182\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Technologies and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-07-2021-0182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在多利益相关者推荐系统(MSRS)中,利益相关者是从生成的推荐中受益的多个实体(消费者、生产者、系统等)。传统上,只关注单个利益相关者(例如,只关注消费者或最终用户)的偏好,掩盖了其他人的福利。在MSRS中纳入多个利益相关者的观点时,遇到了两个主要挑战:为每个利益相关者设计一个专用的效用函数,并在不损害他人的情况下优化他们的效用。本文提出了针对不同利益相关者的多个效用函数,并对这些函数进行了优化,以便为每个利益相关者生成平衡的、个性化的建议。设计/方法/方法提出的方法从多利益相关者推荐设置中考虑了四个有效的利益相关者用户、生产者、演员和推荐系统,并构建了专用的实用函数。用户效用函数包含增强的基于侧信息的相似性计算,用于效用计数。同样,为了提高效用增益,作者为制作人、演员和系统设计了新的效用函数,在推荐列表中加入了长尾和多样化的项目。其次,为了平衡效用增益并生成权衡推荐方案,作者使用NSGA-II对冲突效用函数进行进化优化。在三个基准数据集上进行了实验评估和比较。作者观察到,在平均精度、多样性和新颖性方面,效用增益平均提高了19.70%。曝光率、点击率、覆盖面和目标覆盖率指标都得到了显著改善。原创性/价值一种新的方法同时考虑四个利益相关者及其各自的效用函数,并在利益相关者的冲突效用之间建立权衡推荐解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utility optimization-based multi-stakeholder personalized recommendation system
PurposeIn a multi-stakeholder recommender system (MSRS), stakeholders are the multiple entities (consumer, producer, system, etc.) benefited by the generated recommendations. Traditionally, the exclusive focus on only a single stakeholders' (for example, only consumer or end-user) preferences obscured the welfare of the others. Two major challenges are encountered while incorporating the multiple stakeholders' perspectives in MSRS: designing a dedicated utility function for each stakeholder and optimizing their utility without hurting others. This paper proposes multiple utility functions for different stakeholders and optimizes these functions for generating balanced, personalized recommendations for each stakeholder.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed methodology considers four valid stakeholders user, producer, cast and recommender system from the multi-stakeholder recommender setting and builds dedicated utility functions. The utility function for users incorporates enhanced side-information-based similarity computation for utility count. Similarly, to improve the utility gain, the authors design new utility functions for producer, star-cast and system to incorporate long-tail and diverse items in the recommendation list. Next, to balance the utility gain and generate the trade-off recommendation solution, the authors perform the evolutionary optimization of the conflicting utility functions using NSGA-II. Experimental evaluation and comparison are conducted over three benchmark data sets.FindingsThe authors observed 19.70% of average enhancement in utility gain with improved mean precision, diversity and novelty. Exposure, hit, reach and target reach metrics are substantially improved.Originality/valueA new approach considers four stakeholders simultaneously with their respective utility functions and establishes the trade-off recommendation solution between conflicting utilities of the stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Data Technologies and Applications
Data Technologies and Applications Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Previously published as: Program Online from: 2018 Subject Area: Information & Knowledge Management, Library Studies
期刊最新文献
Understanding customer behavior by mapping complaints to personality based on social media textual data A systematic review of the use of FHIR to support clinical research, public health and medical education Novel framework for learning performance prediction using pattern identification and deep learning A comparative analysis of job satisfaction prediction models using machine learning: a mixed-method approach Assessing the alignment of corporate ESG disclosures with the UN sustainable development goals: a BERT-based text analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1