{"title":"来自《精神病学与法律档案杂志》:伯纳德·l·戴蒙德。医学博士谈《精神科医生的辩护》","authors":"K. Weiss, R. Sadoff","doi":"10.1177/009318531204000204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dr. Bernard L. Diamond (1973) published the first article in the first issue of the Journal of Psychiatry & Law. Entitled “The Psychiatrist as Advocate,” it was a follow-up to his famous editorial, “The Fallacy of the Impartial Expert” (Diamond, 1959). Given the impossibility of total impartiality, the expert witness can still be ethical, but then undertake a form of activism. After nearly 40 years, we continue to reassess our boundaries as expert witnesses. In this article, the author has asked Dr. Robert L. Sadoff to comment on Dr. Diamond's ideas in the context of contemporary ethics.","PeriodicalId":83131,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of psychiatry & law","volume":"12 1","pages":"121 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the Journal of Psychiatry & Law Archives: Bernard L. Diamond. M.D. on “The Psychiatrist as Advocate”\",\"authors\":\"K. Weiss, R. Sadoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/009318531204000204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dr. Bernard L. Diamond (1973) published the first article in the first issue of the Journal of Psychiatry & Law. Entitled “The Psychiatrist as Advocate,” it was a follow-up to his famous editorial, “The Fallacy of the Impartial Expert” (Diamond, 1959). Given the impossibility of total impartiality, the expert witness can still be ethical, but then undertake a form of activism. After nearly 40 years, we continue to reassess our boundaries as expert witnesses. In this article, the author has asked Dr. Robert L. Sadoff to comment on Dr. Diamond's ideas in the context of contemporary ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of psychiatry & law\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of psychiatry & law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531204000204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of psychiatry & law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531204000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
Bernard L. Diamond博士(1973)在《精神病学与法律杂志》的第一期上发表了第一篇文章。题为《作为辩护人的精神科医生》，是他著名社论《公正专家的谬误》(戴蒙德，1959)的后续。鉴于不可能完全公正，专家证人仍然可以是道德的，但随后采取一种形式的激进主义。在将近40年之后，我们继续重新评估我们作为专家证人的界限。在这篇文章中，作者请罗伯特·l·萨多夫博士在当代伦理学的背景下评论戴蒙德博士的观点。
From the Journal of Psychiatry & Law Archives: Bernard L. Diamond. M.D. on “The Psychiatrist as Advocate”
Dr. Bernard L. Diamond (1973) published the first article in the first issue of the Journal of Psychiatry & Law. Entitled “The Psychiatrist as Advocate,” it was a follow-up to his famous editorial, “The Fallacy of the Impartial Expert” (Diamond, 1959). Given the impossibility of total impartiality, the expert witness can still be ethical, but then undertake a form of activism. After nearly 40 years, we continue to reassess our boundaries as expert witnesses. In this article, the author has asked Dr. Robert L. Sadoff to comment on Dr. Diamond's ideas in the context of contemporary ethics.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
