忠于手册的社会教学观点:日常专业知识中的专业原则和困境

L. Harbo, R. Kemp
{"title":"忠于手册的社会教学观点:日常专业知识中的专业原则和困境","authors":"L. Harbo, R. Kemp","doi":"10.14324/111.444.IJSP.2020.V9.X.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manualised interventions, in use across the UK for decades and increasingly in use in Denmark, aim to support change through professional practitioners following detailed prescriptions of what they must do to affect a particular change in the target group. Social pedagogy, a strong professional tradition in Denmark and an emerging profession in the UK, takes an approach that responds to the individual’s experience of the immediate situation, seeks to nurture relational opportunities and to empower people to fully participate in their lives and society. Harbo’s research reveals that this approach can be at odds with manualised interventions for a variety of reasons. A social pedagogically informed programme has been developed in London that uses a clear ethical stance and key theories as its foundation, and upon which structures have been developed, but no manual. This article explores the use of these manualised and non-manualised interventions in Denmark and the UK and the roles of social pedagogues in supporting change through programmatic interventions. Harbo’s doctoral research findings on practice surrounding the highly prescriptive manual Aggression Replacement Training in Denmark ( Harbo, 2019 ) is explored alongside Kemp’s reflections on the social pedagogically informed Family Learning Intervention Programme in England, examining the tensions and synergies that emerge around each programme when they meet reality and the individual characteristics of day-to-day situations. The perspectives presented emerge from practice research and reflections, and as such are based in an experiential research tradition. Finally, we draw together our learning and openings for further research and policy development.","PeriodicalId":32323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social pedagogical perspectives on fidelity to a manual: Professional principles and dilemmas in everyday expertise\",\"authors\":\"L. Harbo, R. Kemp\",\"doi\":\"10.14324/111.444.IJSP.2020.V9.X.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Manualised interventions, in use across the UK for decades and increasingly in use in Denmark, aim to support change through professional practitioners following detailed prescriptions of what they must do to affect a particular change in the target group. Social pedagogy, a strong professional tradition in Denmark and an emerging profession in the UK, takes an approach that responds to the individual’s experience of the immediate situation, seeks to nurture relational opportunities and to empower people to fully participate in their lives and society. Harbo’s research reveals that this approach can be at odds with manualised interventions for a variety of reasons. A social pedagogically informed programme has been developed in London that uses a clear ethical stance and key theories as its foundation, and upon which structures have been developed, but no manual. This article explores the use of these manualised and non-manualised interventions in Denmark and the UK and the roles of social pedagogues in supporting change through programmatic interventions. Harbo’s doctoral research findings on practice surrounding the highly prescriptive manual Aggression Replacement Training in Denmark ( Harbo, 2019 ) is explored alongside Kemp’s reflections on the social pedagogically informed Family Learning Intervention Programme in England, examining the tensions and synergies that emerge around each programme when they meet reality and the individual characteristics of day-to-day situations. The perspectives presented emerge from practice research and reflections, and as such are based in an experiential research tradition. Finally, we draw together our learning and openings for further research and policy development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.IJSP.2020.V9.X.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.IJSP.2020.V9.X.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

手动干预在英国已经使用了几十年,在丹麦也越来越多地使用,其目的是通过专业从业者遵循他们必须做的详细处方来支持改变,以影响目标群体的特定变化。社会教育学在丹麦是一个强大的专业传统,在英国是一个新兴的专业,它采取的方法是回应个人对当前情况的经验,寻求培养关系机会,并使人们能够充分参与他们的生活和社会。哈博的研究表明,由于各种原因,这种方法可能与人工干预不一致。在伦敦已经开发了一个社会教育知情方案,使用明确的道德立场和关键理论作为其基础,并在此基础上开发了结构,但没有手册。本文探讨了在丹麦和英国使用这些手动和非手动干预措施,以及社会教师在通过程序化干预措施支持变革中的作用。Harbo的博士研究成果围绕着丹麦高度规范的手动攻击替代训练的实践(Harbo, 2019),与Kemp对英国社会教学通知家庭学习干预计划的反思一起进行了探讨,研究了每个计划在遇到现实和日常情况的个体特征时出现的紧张关系和协同作用。所提出的观点来自实践研究和反思,因此是基于经验研究传统。最后,我们总结了我们的经验教训,并为进一步的研究和政策制定提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social pedagogical perspectives on fidelity to a manual: Professional principles and dilemmas in everyday expertise
Manualised interventions, in use across the UK for decades and increasingly in use in Denmark, aim to support change through professional practitioners following detailed prescriptions of what they must do to affect a particular change in the target group. Social pedagogy, a strong professional tradition in Denmark and an emerging profession in the UK, takes an approach that responds to the individual’s experience of the immediate situation, seeks to nurture relational opportunities and to empower people to fully participate in their lives and society. Harbo’s research reveals that this approach can be at odds with manualised interventions for a variety of reasons. A social pedagogically informed programme has been developed in London that uses a clear ethical stance and key theories as its foundation, and upon which structures have been developed, but no manual. This article explores the use of these manualised and non-manualised interventions in Denmark and the UK and the roles of social pedagogues in supporting change through programmatic interventions. Harbo’s doctoral research findings on practice surrounding the highly prescriptive manual Aggression Replacement Training in Denmark ( Harbo, 2019 ) is explored alongside Kemp’s reflections on the social pedagogically informed Family Learning Intervention Programme in England, examining the tensions and synergies that emerge around each programme when they meet reality and the individual characteristics of day-to-day situations. The perspectives presented emerge from practice research and reflections, and as such are based in an experiential research tradition. Finally, we draw together our learning and openings for further research and policy development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Influence of the Islamic Social Environment in Developing Children's Creativity: A Case Study of Maestro Architect Achmad Noe'man The Concept of Democracy Education as an Effort for Developing The Political Culture of Participating Communities Trends of Millenial Generation Hijrah in Religious Maturity Perspective Inclusive Education as An Effort To Deradicalize Religion in Indonesia Challenges Against Implementation of Social Studies Curriculum for Moral Development in Nigerian Junior Secondary Schools: Ilorin as Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1