健康干预措施及其对糖尿病患者预后的影响:一项系统综述

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.29090/psa.2022.04.22.041
Kadek Ida Krisnadewi, S. A. Kristina, D. Endarti, T. Andayani
{"title":"健康干预措施及其对糖尿病患者预后的影响:一项系统综述","authors":"Kadek Ida Krisnadewi, S. A. Kristina, D. Endarti, T. Andayani","doi":"10.29090/psa.2022.04.22.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"primary health care, and c) work 9 . The same review by Laws R.A (2012) showed efficacy intervention by external validity and behaviors related to preventive programs. The results can generalized from external validity 10 . In this systematic review, the authors evaluate ABSTRACT Studies related to the prevention of diabetes mellitus have developed rapidly, from effectiveness research to implementation research. However, effective implementation of diabetes programs and evidence of their impact on the population should be produced by means other than measuring the effectiveness of the program. We reviewed the results of systematic reviews focused on diabetes prevention programs and the outcomes of those programs in a real-world setting. A systematic review of the program aimed at assessing or measuring the outcome of preventive programs in individual prediabetes, moderate or high-risk diabetes. In September 2021, an article search was performed on PubMed, Science Direct, and SAGE Journal databases. We have reviewed all the articles published in the last ten years. The exclusion criteria were studies published before 2011. The number of diabetic participants is unknown and the method is incomplete. Eight studies were included in the review. All information about participation and programs. Most of all studies were cohort and RCT studies. All interventions showed positive changes (efficacy) based on weight loss, HbA1C, blood glucose levels, and BMI. Rapid studies have shown that the risk of diabetes is reduced. Our results show that the strength of the program plays an important role in the outcome of weight loss. Programs with different variations (education, Community Health worker, diet, physical activity) have had a positive effect on reducing the risk of diabetes in the population.","PeriodicalId":19761,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health interventions and its impact on outcomes among diabetic patients: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Kadek Ida Krisnadewi, S. A. Kristina, D. Endarti, T. Andayani\",\"doi\":\"10.29090/psa.2022.04.22.041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"primary health care, and c) work 9 . The same review by Laws R.A (2012) showed efficacy intervention by external validity and behaviors related to preventive programs. The results can generalized from external validity 10 . In this systematic review, the authors evaluate ABSTRACT Studies related to the prevention of diabetes mellitus have developed rapidly, from effectiveness research to implementation research. However, effective implementation of diabetes programs and evidence of their impact on the population should be produced by means other than measuring the effectiveness of the program. We reviewed the results of systematic reviews focused on diabetes prevention programs and the outcomes of those programs in a real-world setting. A systematic review of the program aimed at assessing or measuring the outcome of preventive programs in individual prediabetes, moderate or high-risk diabetes. In September 2021, an article search was performed on PubMed, Science Direct, and SAGE Journal databases. We have reviewed all the articles published in the last ten years. The exclusion criteria were studies published before 2011. The number of diabetic participants is unknown and the method is incomplete. Eight studies were included in the review. All information about participation and programs. Most of all studies were cohort and RCT studies. All interventions showed positive changes (efficacy) based on weight loss, HbA1C, blood glucose levels, and BMI. Rapid studies have shown that the risk of diabetes is reduced. Our results show that the strength of the program plays an important role in the outcome of weight loss. Programs with different variations (education, Community Health worker, diet, physical activity) have had a positive effect on reducing the risk of diabetes in the population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29090/psa.2022.04.22.041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29090/psa.2022.04.22.041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

初级卫生保健和c)工作Laws R.A(2012)的同一篇综述显示,与预防项目相关的外部效度和行为对疗效进行了干预。结果可以从外部效度10推广。摘要糖尿病预防的相关研究发展迅速,从有效性研究到可实施性研究。然而,糖尿病项目的有效实施及其对人口影响的证据应该通过其他方式产生,而不是测量项目的有效性。我们回顾了关于糖尿病预防项目的系统综述的结果以及这些项目在现实环境中的结果。一项旨在评估或衡量个体糖尿病前期、中度或高危糖尿病预防项目结果的系统评价。在2021年9月,对PubMed、Science Direct和SAGE期刊数据库进行了文章检索。我们回顾了近十年来发表的所有文章。排除标准为2011年以前发表的研究。糖尿病参与者的数量是未知的,方法是不完整的。该综述纳入了8项研究。有关参与和项目的所有信息。大多数研究都是队列和随机对照试验研究。基于体重减轻、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)、血糖水平和BMI,所有干预措施均显示出积极的变化(疗效)。快速研究表明,患糖尿病的风险降低了。我们的研究结果表明,计划的强度在减肥结果中起着重要作用。不同类型的项目(教育、社区卫生工作者、饮食、体育活动)对降低人群患糖尿病的风险产生了积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health interventions and its impact on outcomes among diabetic patients: A systematic review
primary health care, and c) work 9 . The same review by Laws R.A (2012) showed efficacy intervention by external validity and behaviors related to preventive programs. The results can generalized from external validity 10 . In this systematic review, the authors evaluate ABSTRACT Studies related to the prevention of diabetes mellitus have developed rapidly, from effectiveness research to implementation research. However, effective implementation of diabetes programs and evidence of their impact on the population should be produced by means other than measuring the effectiveness of the program. We reviewed the results of systematic reviews focused on diabetes prevention programs and the outcomes of those programs in a real-world setting. A systematic review of the program aimed at assessing or measuring the outcome of preventive programs in individual prediabetes, moderate or high-risk diabetes. In September 2021, an article search was performed on PubMed, Science Direct, and SAGE Journal databases. We have reviewed all the articles published in the last ten years. The exclusion criteria were studies published before 2011. The number of diabetic participants is unknown and the method is incomplete. Eight studies were included in the review. All information about participation and programs. Most of all studies were cohort and RCT studies. All interventions showed positive changes (efficacy) based on weight loss, HbA1C, blood glucose levels, and BMI. Rapid studies have shown that the risk of diabetes is reduced. Our results show that the strength of the program plays an important role in the outcome of weight loss. Programs with different variations (education, Community Health worker, diet, physical activity) have had a positive effect on reducing the risk of diabetes in the population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia
Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia (PSA) journal is a double-blinded peer-reviewed journal in English published quarterly, by the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Thailand. The PSA journal is formerly known as Mahidol University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and committed to the timely publication of innovative articles and reviews. This journal is available in both printed and electronic formats. The PSA journal aims at establishing a publishing house that is open to all. It aims to disseminate knowledge; provide a learned reference in the field; and establish channels of communication between academic and research expert, policy makers and executives in industry and investment institutions. The journal publishes research articles, review articles, and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences and multidisciplinary field in health professions and medicine. More specifically, the journal publishes research on all areas of pharmaceutical sciences and related disciplines: Clinical Pharmacy Drug Synthesis and Discovery Targeted-Drug Delivery Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutical Sciences Phytopharmaceutical Sciences Pharmacology and Toxicology Pharmaceutical Chemistry Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods Natural Products Social, Economic, and Administrative Pharmacy Clinical Drug Evaluation and Drug Policy Making Antimicrobials, Resistance and Infection Control Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.
期刊最新文献
Locally-isolated protease-producing Bacillus spp. from soil inhibits biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus Medication errors analysis in Asia and Australia: A systematic review The effect of different sweeteners on the free radical scavenging activities, alcohol contents, sugar reductions, and hedonic properties of green tea kombucha Development and validation of a GC-MS method for determination of amphetamine-type stimulants and ketamine in human hair Effect of zonisamide and Nigella sativa on blood-brain barrier permeability and neurological severity in traumatic brain injury-induced mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1