大鼠眶额皮层内侧和外侧在视觉序列反转学习中的分离和矛盾作用

M. E. Hervig, Leanne Fiddian, L. Piilgaard, Tadej Božič, M. Blanco-Pozo, C. Knudsen, S. F. Olesen, J. Alsiö, T. W. Robbins
{"title":"大鼠眶额皮层内侧和外侧在视觉序列反转学习中的分离和矛盾作用","authors":"M. E. Hervig, Leanne Fiddian, L. Piilgaard, Tadej Božič, M. Blanco-Pozo, C. Knudsen, S. F. Olesen, J. Alsiö, T. W. Robbins","doi":"10.1093/cercor/bhz144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Much evidence suggests that reversal learning is mediated by cortico-striatal circuitries with the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) playing a prominent role. The OFC is a functionally heterogeneous region, but potential differential roles of lateral (lOFC) and medial (mOFC) portions in visual reversal learning have yet to be determined. We investigated the effects of pharmacological inactivation of mOFC and lOFC on a deterministic serial visual reversal learning task for rats. For reference, we also targeted other areas previously implicated in reversal learning: prelimbic (PrL) and infralimbic (IL) prefrontal cortex, and basolateral amygdala (BLA). Inactivating mOFC and lOFC produced opposite effects; lOFC impairing, and mOFC improving, performance in the early, perseverative phase specifically. Additionally, mOFC inactivation enhanced negative feedback sensitivity, while lOFC inactivation diminished feedback sensitivity in general. mOFC and lOFC inactivation also affected novel visual discrimination learning differently; lOFC inactivation paradoxically improved learning, and mOFC inactivation had no effect. We also observed dissociable roles of the OFC and the IL/PrL. Whereas the OFC inactivation affected only perseveration, IL/PrL inactivation improved learning overall. BLA inactivation did not affect perseveration, but improved the late phase of reversal learning. These results support opponent roles of the rodent mOFC and lOFC in deterministic visual reversal learning.","PeriodicalId":9825,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)","volume":"58 1","pages":"1016 - 1029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissociable and Paradoxical Roles of Rat Medial and Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex in Visual Serial Reversal Learning\",\"authors\":\"M. E. Hervig, Leanne Fiddian, L. Piilgaard, Tadej Božič, M. Blanco-Pozo, C. Knudsen, S. F. Olesen, J. Alsiö, T. W. Robbins\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cercor/bhz144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Much evidence suggests that reversal learning is mediated by cortico-striatal circuitries with the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) playing a prominent role. The OFC is a functionally heterogeneous region, but potential differential roles of lateral (lOFC) and medial (mOFC) portions in visual reversal learning have yet to be determined. We investigated the effects of pharmacological inactivation of mOFC and lOFC on a deterministic serial visual reversal learning task for rats. For reference, we also targeted other areas previously implicated in reversal learning: prelimbic (PrL) and infralimbic (IL) prefrontal cortex, and basolateral amygdala (BLA). Inactivating mOFC and lOFC produced opposite effects; lOFC impairing, and mOFC improving, performance in the early, perseverative phase specifically. Additionally, mOFC inactivation enhanced negative feedback sensitivity, while lOFC inactivation diminished feedback sensitivity in general. mOFC and lOFC inactivation also affected novel visual discrimination learning differently; lOFC inactivation paradoxically improved learning, and mOFC inactivation had no effect. We also observed dissociable roles of the OFC and the IL/PrL. Whereas the OFC inactivation affected only perseveration, IL/PrL inactivation improved learning overall. BLA inactivation did not affect perseveration, but improved the late phase of reversal learning. These results support opponent roles of the rodent mOFC and lOFC in deterministic visual reversal learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"1016 - 1029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

大量证据表明,反转学习是由皮质纹状体回路介导的,其中眶额皮质(OFC)起着重要作用。OFC是一个功能各异的区域,但在视觉反转学习中,侧部(lOFC)和内侧(mOFC)部分的潜在差异作用尚未确定。我们研究了mOFC和lOFC的药理失活对大鼠确定性连续视觉逆转学习任务的影响。作为参考,我们还针对其他先前涉及反转学习的区域:前边缘(PrL)和边缘下(IL)前额皮质和杏仁核基底外侧(BLA)。失活mOFC和lOFC产生相反的效果;特别是在早期的持续性阶段,lOFC损害,而mOFC改善。此外,mOFC失活增强了负反馈灵敏度,而lOFC失活总体上降低了反馈灵敏度。mOFC和lOFC失活对新视觉辨别学习也有不同的影响;lOFC失活反而改善了学习,而mOFC失活则没有效果。我们还观察到OFC和IL/PrL的分离作用。虽然OFC失活只影响持久性,但IL/PrL失活总体上改善了学习。BLA失活不影响持续性,但改善了逆转学习的后期阶段。这些结果支持啮齿动物的前叶皮层和后叶皮层在确定性视觉反转学习中的对立作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dissociable and Paradoxical Roles of Rat Medial and Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex in Visual Serial Reversal Learning
ABSTRACT Much evidence suggests that reversal learning is mediated by cortico-striatal circuitries with the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) playing a prominent role. The OFC is a functionally heterogeneous region, but potential differential roles of lateral (lOFC) and medial (mOFC) portions in visual reversal learning have yet to be determined. We investigated the effects of pharmacological inactivation of mOFC and lOFC on a deterministic serial visual reversal learning task for rats. For reference, we also targeted other areas previously implicated in reversal learning: prelimbic (PrL) and infralimbic (IL) prefrontal cortex, and basolateral amygdala (BLA). Inactivating mOFC and lOFC produced opposite effects; lOFC impairing, and mOFC improving, performance in the early, perseverative phase specifically. Additionally, mOFC inactivation enhanced negative feedback sensitivity, while lOFC inactivation diminished feedback sensitivity in general. mOFC and lOFC inactivation also affected novel visual discrimination learning differently; lOFC inactivation paradoxically improved learning, and mOFC inactivation had no effect. We also observed dissociable roles of the OFC and the IL/PrL. Whereas the OFC inactivation affected only perseveration, IL/PrL inactivation improved learning overall. BLA inactivation did not affect perseveration, but improved the late phase of reversal learning. These results support opponent roles of the rodent mOFC and lOFC in deterministic visual reversal learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consistently increased dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity during the exposure to acute stressors Conditioning and pseudoconditioning differently change intrinsic excitability of inhibitory interneurons in the neocortex Phonological properties of logographic words modulate brain activation in bilinguals: a comparative study of Chinese characters and Japanese Kanji Inferior parietal cortex represents relational structures for explicit transitive inference In vivo ephaptic coupling allows memory network formation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1