用多流量技术评价水-油渗透率试验中的毛细端效应

I. D. Santos, F. Eler, D. Nunes, P. Couto
{"title":"用多流量技术评价水-油渗透率试验中的毛细端效应","authors":"I. D. Santos, F. Eler, D. Nunes, P. Couto","doi":"10.5419/BJPG2020-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relative permeability curves obtained in laboratory are used in reservoir simulators to predict production and establish the best strategies for an oil field. Therefore, researchers study several procedures to obtain relative permeability curves. Among these procedures are the multiple flow rates injection methods. Thus, this work proposes to develop an experimental procedure with multiple increasing flows. To make this feasible, simulations were initially carried out at CYDAR, aiming to establish flow rates and time necessary to achieve system stabilization, within the limits of the equipment. After that, tests were carried out establishing the minimum time of 5 hours to stabilize the oil production, and the differential pressure at each flow rate. The accounting and minimization of the capillary end effect in these tests were also evaluated. Capillary pressure constraints contributed to minimize the number of possible solutions to the optimization problem improving the fit of solutions for a specific case.","PeriodicalId":9312,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas","volume":"79 1","pages":"259-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF CAPILLARY END EFFECT IN WATER-OIL PERMEABILITY TESTS USING MULTIPLE FLOW RATES TECHNIQUE\",\"authors\":\"I. D. Santos, F. Eler, D. Nunes, P. Couto\",\"doi\":\"10.5419/BJPG2020-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relative permeability curves obtained in laboratory are used in reservoir simulators to predict production and establish the best strategies for an oil field. Therefore, researchers study several procedures to obtain relative permeability curves. Among these procedures are the multiple flow rates injection methods. Thus, this work proposes to develop an experimental procedure with multiple increasing flows. To make this feasible, simulations were initially carried out at CYDAR, aiming to establish flow rates and time necessary to achieve system stabilization, within the limits of the equipment. After that, tests were carried out establishing the minimum time of 5 hours to stabilize the oil production, and the differential pressure at each flow rate. The accounting and minimization of the capillary end effect in these tests were also evaluated. Capillary pressure constraints contributed to minimize the number of possible solutions to the optimization problem improving the fit of solutions for a specific case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"259-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5419/BJPG2020-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5419/BJPG2020-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

利用实验室获得的相对渗透率曲线,在油藏模拟中进行产量预测,制定油田的最佳开采策略。因此,研究人员研究了几种方法来获得相对渗透率曲线。在这些程序中有多流量注射方法。因此,本工作提出了一种具有多重增加流的实验程序。为了实现这一目标,最初在CYDAR进行了模拟,旨在确定在设备限制范围内实现系统稳定所需的流量和时间。之后,进行了测试,确定了稳定产油的最短时间为5小时,并确定了各流量下的压差。还对这些试验中毛细管末端效应的计算和最小化进行了评价。毛细管压力约束有助于最小化优化问题的可能解的数量,提高了特定情况下解的拟合性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EVALUATION OF CAPILLARY END EFFECT IN WATER-OIL PERMEABILITY TESTS USING MULTIPLE FLOW RATES TECHNIQUE
Relative permeability curves obtained in laboratory are used in reservoir simulators to predict production and establish the best strategies for an oil field. Therefore, researchers study several procedures to obtain relative permeability curves. Among these procedures are the multiple flow rates injection methods. Thus, this work proposes to develop an experimental procedure with multiple increasing flows. To make this feasible, simulations were initially carried out at CYDAR, aiming to establish flow rates and time necessary to achieve system stabilization, within the limits of the equipment. After that, tests were carried out establishing the minimum time of 5 hours to stabilize the oil production, and the differential pressure at each flow rate. The accounting and minimization of the capillary end effect in these tests were also evaluated. Capillary pressure constraints contributed to minimize the number of possible solutions to the optimization problem improving the fit of solutions for a specific case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMMISCIBLE VISCOUS FINGERING MODELING OF TERTIARY POLYMER FLOODING BASED ON REAL CASE OF HEAVY OIL RESERVOIR MODEL SYNTHETIC WATER-IN-OIL EMULSIONS: EFFECT OF OIL COMPOSITION ON STABILITY AND DEMULSIFIER PERFORMANCE WELL-TO-WELL (W2W) ELECTROMAGNETIC TOMOGRAPHY MODELING ADVANCEMENT: IMPROVING PRECISION AND EFFECTIVENESS WITH REGULARIZATION SCALE INHIBITOR SQUEEZE TREATMENT: AN ADVANCED BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS REACTIVE FLOW IN CARBONATE ROCKS FROM LACUSTRINE ENVIRONMENTS: THE EFFECTS OF PRESSURE AND FLUID SALINITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1