乌克兰历史学家著作中书面资料的内部批评方法——以《教育史》科学叙事为例(1840 -1930)

M. Haliv, V. Ilnytskyi
{"title":"乌克兰历史学家著作中书面资料的内部批评方法——以《教育史》科学叙事为例(1840 -1930)","authors":"M. Haliv, V. Ilnytskyi","doi":"10.29302/auash.2021.25.1.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of the study of the methodology of internal critique of written sources used by Ukrainian historians in the second half of the XIX - the first half of the XX century who worked on the history of education. The authors state that in Ukrainian historical science there is no synthesized study of the methodology of internal critique of written sources that was used by the researchers of the history of education. It is investigated that during the second half of the XIX - the first half of the XX century, Ukrainian scholars gradually improved the internal critique of the sources. In the first half of the XIX century, Ukrainian historians mostly used documents rather uncritically, \"extracting\" from them information about the past without proper verification. It was often made without regard to the author's position of the source, the explanatory and rhetorical layer of the document. But since the 1850s, the understanding of the need to delve into the text of the source and comprehend the position of the author of the historical document has been established in Ukrainian historical science critically. It was found that Ukrainian historians of education almost did not apply internal criticism to the so-called \"official\" sources on the history of education (legislation, statutes of educational institutions, reporting documentation of educational authorities, minutes of meetings of pedagogical or academic councils, etc.). These documents were not in doubt, especially, if they concerned the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. On the other hand, Ukrainian scholars have shown the ability to prove the authenticity of the evidence of a written historical document both by analyzing only its content and by comparing the content of this source with other sources. The article proves that in the second half of the XIX - first half of the XX century, Ukrainian historians most often used the following procedures among the methods of internal criticism of the written source to determine the authenticity of a historical document: by indicating the specifics of the document; by analyzing the author's ability to reflect reality adequately; by analyzing the motives of the author by confirming the information from one source related to the previous location, chronologically, thematically and ideologically; through the use of logical and epistemological procedures.","PeriodicalId":38216,"journal":{"name":"Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Methods of Internal Criticism of Written Sources in the Works of Ukrainian Historians: On the Example of Scientific Narratives on the History of Education (1840s-1930s)\",\"authors\":\"M. Haliv, V. Ilnytskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.29302/auash.2021.25.1.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents the results of the study of the methodology of internal critique of written sources used by Ukrainian historians in the second half of the XIX - the first half of the XX century who worked on the history of education. The authors state that in Ukrainian historical science there is no synthesized study of the methodology of internal critique of written sources that was used by the researchers of the history of education. It is investigated that during the second half of the XIX - the first half of the XX century, Ukrainian scholars gradually improved the internal critique of the sources. In the first half of the XIX century, Ukrainian historians mostly used documents rather uncritically, \\\"extracting\\\" from them information about the past without proper verification. It was often made without regard to the author's position of the source, the explanatory and rhetorical layer of the document. But since the 1850s, the understanding of the need to delve into the text of the source and comprehend the position of the author of the historical document has been established in Ukrainian historical science critically. It was found that Ukrainian historians of education almost did not apply internal criticism to the so-called \\\"official\\\" sources on the history of education (legislation, statutes of educational institutions, reporting documentation of educational authorities, minutes of meetings of pedagogical or academic councils, etc.). These documents were not in doubt, especially, if they concerned the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. On the other hand, Ukrainian scholars have shown the ability to prove the authenticity of the evidence of a written historical document both by analyzing only its content and by comparing the content of this source with other sources. The article proves that in the second half of the XIX - first half of the XX century, Ukrainian historians most often used the following procedures among the methods of internal criticism of the written source to determine the authenticity of a historical document: by indicating the specifics of the document; by analyzing the author's ability to reflect reality adequately; by analyzing the motives of the author by confirming the information from one source related to the previous location, chronologically, thematically and ideologically; through the use of logical and epistemological procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29302/auash.2021.25.1.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29302/auash.2021.25.1.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了十九世纪下半叶乌克兰历史学家使用的书面来源内部批评方法的研究结果-二十世纪上半叶从事教育史的人。作者指出,在乌克兰历史科学中,没有对教育史研究人员所使用的书面来源的内部批评方法进行综合研究。据调查,在十九世纪下半叶-二十世纪上半叶,乌克兰学者逐渐完善了对来源的内部批评。在19世纪上半叶,乌克兰历史学家大多不加批判地使用文献,在未经适当核实的情况下,从文献中“提取”有关过去的信息。它经常不考虑作者对来源的立场,文件的解释和修辞层面。但自19世纪50年代以来,乌克兰历史科学批判性地认识到,有必要深入研究文献来源的文本,并理解历史文献作者的立场。调查发现,乌克兰教育历史学家几乎没有对所谓的教育史“官方”来源(立法、教育机构章程、教育当局的报告文件、教学或学术委员会的会议记录等)进行内部批评。这些文件是毫无疑问的,特别是如果它们涉及19世纪和20世纪。另一方面,乌克兰学者表现出证明书面历史文件证据真实性的能力,他们只分析其内容,并将该来源的内容与其他来源进行比较。本文证明,在十九世纪下半叶至二十世纪上半叶,乌克兰历史学家在书面来源的内部批评方法中最常使用以下程序来确定历史文献的真实性:通过表明文件的细节;通过分析作者充分反映现实的能力;通过确认与前一地点、时间顺序、主题和意识形态相关的一个来源的信息来分析作者的动机;通过使用逻辑和认识论的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Methods of Internal Criticism of Written Sources in the Works of Ukrainian Historians: On the Example of Scientific Narratives on the History of Education (1840s-1930s)
The article presents the results of the study of the methodology of internal critique of written sources used by Ukrainian historians in the second half of the XIX - the first half of the XX century who worked on the history of education. The authors state that in Ukrainian historical science there is no synthesized study of the methodology of internal critique of written sources that was used by the researchers of the history of education. It is investigated that during the second half of the XIX - the first half of the XX century, Ukrainian scholars gradually improved the internal critique of the sources. In the first half of the XIX century, Ukrainian historians mostly used documents rather uncritically, "extracting" from them information about the past without proper verification. It was often made without regard to the author's position of the source, the explanatory and rhetorical layer of the document. But since the 1850s, the understanding of the need to delve into the text of the source and comprehend the position of the author of the historical document has been established in Ukrainian historical science critically. It was found that Ukrainian historians of education almost did not apply internal criticism to the so-called "official" sources on the history of education (legislation, statutes of educational institutions, reporting documentation of educational authorities, minutes of meetings of pedagogical or academic councils, etc.). These documents were not in doubt, especially, if they concerned the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. On the other hand, Ukrainian scholars have shown the ability to prove the authenticity of the evidence of a written historical document both by analyzing only its content and by comparing the content of this source with other sources. The article proves that in the second half of the XIX - first half of the XX century, Ukrainian historians most often used the following procedures among the methods of internal criticism of the written source to determine the authenticity of a historical document: by indicating the specifics of the document; by analyzing the author's ability to reflect reality adequately; by analyzing the motives of the author by confirming the information from one source related to the previous location, chronologically, thematically and ideologically; through the use of logical and epistemological procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica
Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Context of the First Romanian Translations Revisited Evolution of the Network of Religious Schools in Ung County in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries The Reformed College of Alba Iulia - Sárospatak In the Web of Arguments and Interests: Debate in Vienna on the Introduction of the Subject Teacher System Russian Icon Marketing in Transylvania as a Means of Political and Social Destabilization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1