教学法与评价:21世纪工商管理学位课程面临的挑战

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.34190/JBRM.18.2.002
A. Brown, M. Rich
{"title":"教学法与评价:21世纪工商管理学位课程面临的挑战","authors":"A. Brown, M. Rich","doi":"10.34190/JBRM.18.2.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The twenty first century has been a period of major change\n for business organisations and industries. This has led to an ever\n greater interest in and demand for managers with not only the\n traditional subject knowledge and technical skills but also\n individual business skills. To meet these demands business schools\n are under pressure to adapt their courses appropriately and to\n innovate. For an undergraduate degree in business management, this\n includes both the structure of the degree, the subjects covered, the\n teaching methods used and the whole student learning experience. But\n innovation poses a major challenge for researchers and teachers\n alike – how can the effect of an innovation be measured or assessed?\n This paper assesses the current state of evaluation methods applied\n in Business Schools. Student feedback has emerged as the dominant\n approach, but application is still at a fairly basic level. A case\n example of evaluating the new first year redesign of the business\n management degree at City’s Business School is used to illustrate\n the practical issues involved. Student feedback offers some\n indication of the success of the redesigned degree, but it does not\n entail any constructive dialogue between students and lecturers, and\n students often lack the skills to frame feedback constructively. The\n paper discusses the implications of changes in the business context\n for the evaluation methods used in Business Schools.","PeriodicalId":38532,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pedagogy and Evaluation: The Challenge for Business and\\n Management Degree Courses in the 21st Century\",\"authors\":\"A. Brown, M. Rich\",\"doi\":\"10.34190/JBRM.18.2.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The twenty first century has been a period of major change\\n for business organisations and industries. This has led to an ever\\n greater interest in and demand for managers with not only the\\n traditional subject knowledge and technical skills but also\\n individual business skills. To meet these demands business schools\\n are under pressure to adapt their courses appropriately and to\\n innovate. For an undergraduate degree in business management, this\\n includes both the structure of the degree, the subjects covered, the\\n teaching methods used and the whole student learning experience. But\\n innovation poses a major challenge for researchers and teachers\\n alike – how can the effect of an innovation be measured or assessed?\\n This paper assesses the current state of evaluation methods applied\\n in Business Schools. Student feedback has emerged as the dominant\\n approach, but application is still at a fairly basic level. A case\\n example of evaluating the new first year redesign of the business\\n management degree at City’s Business School is used to illustrate\\n the practical issues involved. Student feedback offers some\\n indication of the success of the redesigned degree, but it does not\\n entail any constructive dialogue between students and lecturers, and\\n students often lack the skills to frame feedback constructively. The\\n paper discusses the implications of changes in the business context\\n for the evaluation methods used in Business Schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

21世纪是商业组织和行业发生重大变化的时期。这导致人们对不仅具有传统学科知识和技术技能,而且具有个人商业技能的管理人员的兴趣和需求越来越大。为了满足这些需求,商学院面临着适当调整课程和创新的压力。对于商业管理本科学位,这包括学位的结构、涵盖的科目、使用的教学方法和整个学生的学习经历。但是创新对研究人员和教师都提出了一个重大挑战——如何衡量或评估创新的效果?本文对商学院应用的评估方法的现状进行了评估。学生反馈已成为主要的方法,但应用仍处于相当基础的水平。本文以评估伦敦城市商学院(City’s business School)工商管理学位第一年重新设计的案例为例,说明了所涉及的实际问题。学生的反馈提供了重新设计学位课程成功的一些迹象,但它不需要学生和讲师之间进行任何建设性的对话,学生往往缺乏建设性地构建反馈的技能。本文讨论了商业环境变化对商学院使用的评估方法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pedagogy and Evaluation: The Challenge for Business and Management Degree Courses in the 21st Century
The twenty first century has been a period of major change for business organisations and industries. This has led to an ever greater interest in and demand for managers with not only the traditional subject knowledge and technical skills but also individual business skills. To meet these demands business schools are under pressure to adapt their courses appropriately and to innovate. For an undergraduate degree in business management, this includes both the structure of the degree, the subjects covered, the teaching methods used and the whole student learning experience. But innovation poses a major challenge for researchers and teachers alike – how can the effect of an innovation be measured or assessed? This paper assesses the current state of evaluation methods applied in Business Schools. Student feedback has emerged as the dominant approach, but application is still at a fairly basic level. A case example of evaluating the new first year redesign of the business management degree at City’s Business School is used to illustrate the practical issues involved. Student feedback offers some indication of the success of the redesigned degree, but it does not entail any constructive dialogue between students and lecturers, and students often lack the skills to frame feedback constructively. The paper discusses the implications of changes in the business context for the evaluation methods used in Business Schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods (EJBRM) provides perspectives on topics relevant to research methods applied in the field of business and management. Through its publication the journal contributes to the development of theory and practice. The journal accepts academically robust papers that contribute to the area of research methods applied in business and management research. Papers submitted to the journal are double-blind reviewed by members of the reviewer committee or other suitably qualified readers. The Editor reserves the right to reject papers that, in the view of the editorial board, are either of insufficient quality, or are not relevant enough to the subject area. The editor is happy to discuss contributions before submission. The journal publishes work in the categories described below. Research Papers: These may be qualitative or quantitative, empirical or theoretical in nature and can discuss completed research findings or work in progress. Case Studies: Case studies are welcomed illustrating business and management research methods in practise. View Points: View points are less academically rigorous articles usually in areas of controversy which will fuel some interesting debate. Conference Reports and Book Reviews: Anyone who attends a conference or reads a book that they feel contributes to the area of Business Research Methods is encouraged to submit a review for publication.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling Endogeneity: A Systematic Review of Methodologies in Digital Leadership and Remote Work Research Double Bias of Mistakes: Essence, Consequences, and Measurement Method Statistically Validating a Theory Represented by a Venn Diagram How Cognitive Biases Influence Problematic Research Methods Practices Using Mixed Methods to Understand Tax Compliance Behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1