单独生育:禁止生育伴侣的流行病政策的伦理分析

Phoebe Friesen, S. Towle, T. Perez
{"title":"单独生育:禁止生育伴侣的流行病政策的伦理分析","authors":"Phoebe Friesen, S. Towle, T. Perez","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-14.2.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, several hospitals implemented “birthing alone” policies, banning companions (e.g., partners, family members, doulas) from accompanying individuals giving birth. We offer an ethical analysis of these policies. First, we examine them through a consequentialist framework of risks and benefits. Second, we consider the significance of birth, highlighting the unique ways in which risks, relationships, and rights are understood in the context of obstetrics. We conclude that birthing alone policies are largely unjustified, as the harm they are certain to cause outweighs their possible benefits and because they fail to take into account what matters to mothers.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"24 1","pages":"114 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Birthing Alone: An Ethical Analysis of Pandemic Policies Banning Birthing Partners\",\"authors\":\"Phoebe Friesen, S. Towle, T. Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ijfab-14.2.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, several hospitals implemented “birthing alone” policies, banning companions (e.g., partners, family members, doulas) from accompanying individuals giving birth. We offer an ethical analysis of these policies. First, we examine them through a consequentialist framework of risks and benefits. Second, we consider the significance of birth, highlighting the unique ways in which risks, relationships, and rights are understood in the context of obstetrics. We conclude that birthing alone policies are largely unjustified, as the harm they are certain to cause outweighs their possible benefits and because they fail to take into account what matters to mothers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"114 - 143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-14.2.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-14.2.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,多家医院实施“单独分娩”政策,禁止伴侣(如伴侣、家庭成员、助产师)陪同分娩。我们对这些政策进行了道德分析。首先,我们通过风险和收益的结果主义框架来检查它们。其次,我们考虑出生的重要性,强调在产科背景下理解风险、关系和权利的独特方式。我们的结论是,单独生育政策在很大程度上是不合理的,因为它们肯定会造成伤害,而不是可能带来的好处,因为它们没有考虑到对母亲来说最重要的是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Birthing Alone: An Ethical Analysis of Pandemic Policies Banning Birthing Partners
Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, several hospitals implemented “birthing alone” policies, banning companions (e.g., partners, family members, doulas) from accompanying individuals giving birth. We offer an ethical analysis of these policies. First, we examine them through a consequentialist framework of risks and benefits. Second, we consider the significance of birth, highlighting the unique ways in which risks, relationships, and rights are understood in the context of obstetrics. We conclude that birthing alone policies are largely unjustified, as the harm they are certain to cause outweighs their possible benefits and because they fail to take into account what matters to mothers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Being an Anorectic versus Having Anorexia: Should the DSM Diagnostic Criteria Be Modified? Diagnosing Desire: Biopolitics and Femininity into the Twenty-First Century by Alyson K. Spurgas (review) Introduction to the Symposium on Daniel Groll's Conceiving People Significant Interests and the Right to Know Being the Right Kind of Parent: Conceiving People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1