科塞莱克的《历史与政治视野》

Blake Ewing
{"title":"科塞莱克的《历史与政治视野》","authors":"Blake Ewing","doi":"10.3167/CHOC.2018.130204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political theorists, especially in the subfield of ideology studies, continue\nto draw insights from Begriffsgeschichte (conceptual history) to help them\nbetter analyze the morphology of political concepts over time. However,\nother aspects of Reinhart Koselleck’s work remain underutilized. This is\nespecially true of the connections between Begriffsgeschichte and his development\nof a theory of history (Historik), dealing with the broader intersection\nof language, structure, and the experience of time. This article\nfocuses on just one aspect of this intersection: on the potential relevance\nof Koselleck’s use of the concept of horizon to theorize a particular “horizonal\nmode” of the politics of time. After discussing some relevant features\nof the horizon metaphor, the article moves to reappraise Koselleck’s use of\nthe concept before elaborating and expanding on it to claim that Koselleck\nhelps to showcase the contestation of different temporal horizons as a core\nfeature of political thinking.","PeriodicalId":42746,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Koselleck’s Historik and the Horizons of Politics\",\"authors\":\"Blake Ewing\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/CHOC.2018.130204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political theorists, especially in the subfield of ideology studies, continue\\nto draw insights from Begriffsgeschichte (conceptual history) to help them\\nbetter analyze the morphology of political concepts over time. However,\\nother aspects of Reinhart Koselleck’s work remain underutilized. This is\\nespecially true of the connections between Begriffsgeschichte and his development\\nof a theory of history (Historik), dealing with the broader intersection\\nof language, structure, and the experience of time. This article\\nfocuses on just one aspect of this intersection: on the potential relevance\\nof Koselleck’s use of the concept of horizon to theorize a particular “horizonal\\nmode” of the politics of time. After discussing some relevant features\\nof the horizon metaphor, the article moves to reappraise Koselleck’s use of\\nthe concept before elaborating and expanding on it to claim that Koselleck\\nhelps to showcase the contestation of different temporal horizons as a core\\nfeature of political thinking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/CHOC.2018.130204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/CHOC.2018.130204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

政治理论家,特别是在意识形态研究的子领域,继续从概念史(Begriffsgeschichte)中汲取见解,以帮助他们更好地分析政治概念随时间的形态。然而,莱因哈特·科塞莱克工作的其他方面仍未得到充分利用。Begriffsgeschichte与他的历史理论(Historik)的发展之间的联系尤其如此,该理论涉及语言,结构和时间经验的更广泛的交叉。本文只关注这种交集的一个方面:科塞莱克使用视界概念来理论化时间政治的特定“水平模式”的潜在相关性。在讨论了视界隐喻的一些相关特征之后,本文在详细阐述和扩展科塞莱克的概念之前,重新评价了科塞莱克对这一概念的使用,并声称科塞莱克有助于展示不同时间视界的争论是政治思维的核心特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Koselleck’s Historik and the Horizons of Politics
Political theorists, especially in the subfield of ideology studies, continue to draw insights from Begriffsgeschichte (conceptual history) to help them better analyze the morphology of political concepts over time. However, other aspects of Reinhart Koselleck’s work remain underutilized. This is especially true of the connections between Begriffsgeschichte and his development of a theory of history (Historik), dealing with the broader intersection of language, structure, and the experience of time. This article focuses on just one aspect of this intersection: on the potential relevance of Koselleck’s use of the concept of horizon to theorize a particular “horizonal mode” of the politics of time. After discussing some relevant features of the horizon metaphor, the article moves to reappraise Koselleck’s use of the concept before elaborating and expanding on it to claim that Koselleck helps to showcase the contestation of different temporal horizons as a core feature of political thinking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Contributions to the History of Concepts is no longer published by Brill from 2010.
期刊最新文献
Desencanto in the Spanish Transition (1977–1982) From Empires of Nations to the Nation-State of Minorities Generation Marx The Mainstreaming of Global Inequality, 1980–2020 Early Modern Terminology for Dialect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1