化妆品安全:用体外试验代替体内试验的建议

T. Pinto, T. I. Ikeda, L. Miyamaru, M. C. Santa, Bárbara R.P. Santos, Á. S. Cruz
{"title":"化妆品安全:用体外试验代替体内试验的建议","authors":"T. Pinto, T. I. Ikeda, L. Miyamaru, M. C. Santa, Bárbara R.P. Santos, Á. S. Cruz","doi":"10.2174/1874340400903010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The procedures described by Draize have been criticized for ethical reasons. Thus, a comparative study was performed between ocular and cutaneous irritation tests, using rabbits and in vitro test through agar diffusion with the use of NCTC clone 929, FPC-IAL and SIRC cell lines. The results obtained revealed that the agar diffusion test positive sam- ples, which presented up to degree 3 reactivity rate, according to USP 31, did not provoke ocular or cutaneous irritation. The samples which presented reactivity grade 4 also showed different degrees of ocular and cutaneous irritation, with the exception of two units of liquid soap for children use. According to the data, the diffusion agar method, using the Ameri- can Pharmacopeia graduation, can be adopted as a sorting procedure in the evaluation of cosmetics. This is a result of its capacity of predicting irritation, what largely contributes for a decrease in the use of animals in tests.","PeriodicalId":22859,"journal":{"name":"The Open Toxicology Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cosmetic Safety: Proposal for the Replacement of In Vivo (Draize) by In Vitro Test\",\"authors\":\"T. Pinto, T. I. Ikeda, L. Miyamaru, M. C. Santa, Bárbara R.P. Santos, Á. S. Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874340400903010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The procedures described by Draize have been criticized for ethical reasons. Thus, a comparative study was performed between ocular and cutaneous irritation tests, using rabbits and in vitro test through agar diffusion with the use of NCTC clone 929, FPC-IAL and SIRC cell lines. The results obtained revealed that the agar diffusion test positive sam- ples, which presented up to degree 3 reactivity rate, according to USP 31, did not provoke ocular or cutaneous irritation. The samples which presented reactivity grade 4 also showed different degrees of ocular and cutaneous irritation, with the exception of two units of liquid soap for children use. According to the data, the diffusion agar method, using the Ameri- can Pharmacopeia graduation, can be adopted as a sorting procedure in the evaluation of cosmetics. This is a result of its capacity of predicting irritation, what largely contributes for a decrease in the use of animals in tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Toxicology Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Toxicology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874340400903010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Toxicology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874340400903010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

Draize描述的程序因道德原因而受到批评。因此,我们使用ntc克隆929、FPC-IAL和SIRC细胞系进行了眼部和皮肤刺激试验、家兔和琼脂扩散体外试验的比较研究。所得结果显示,琼脂扩散试验阳性样品,其反应率高达3度,根据USP 31,没有引起眼睛或皮肤刺激。反应性为4级的样品也显示出不同程度的眼部和皮肤刺激,只有两个单位的儿童用液体肥皂除外。结果表明,采用美国药典分级法的扩散琼脂法可作为化妆品质量评价的分选方法。这是它预测刺激的能力的结果,这在很大程度上有助于减少在试验中使用动物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cosmetic Safety: Proposal for the Replacement of In Vivo (Draize) by In Vitro Test
The procedures described by Draize have been criticized for ethical reasons. Thus, a comparative study was performed between ocular and cutaneous irritation tests, using rabbits and in vitro test through agar diffusion with the use of NCTC clone 929, FPC-IAL and SIRC cell lines. The results obtained revealed that the agar diffusion test positive sam- ples, which presented up to degree 3 reactivity rate, according to USP 31, did not provoke ocular or cutaneous irritation. The samples which presented reactivity grade 4 also showed different degrees of ocular and cutaneous irritation, with the exception of two units of liquid soap for children use. According to the data, the diffusion agar method, using the Ameri- can Pharmacopeia graduation, can be adopted as a sorting procedure in the evaluation of cosmetics. This is a result of its capacity of predicting irritation, what largely contributes for a decrease in the use of animals in tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High Glucose Enhances Skin Sensitizer-induced NRF2 Activation In Vitro Blood Hemostasis Dysfunction and Inflammation in COVID-19 Patients: Viral and Host Active Molecules as Therapeutic Targets Key Role of the Rational Laboratory Strategy in Diagnostic, Analytical and Forensic Toxicology A Practical Guide to the Calculation of Uncertainty of Measurement The Relevance of Synergy Between Forensic Pathologist and Toxicologist in Medico-Legal Autopsies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1