当代宪政民主:程序化的初步研究

Matheus DE OLIVEIRA CUNHA
{"title":"当代宪政民主:程序化的初步研究","authors":"Matheus DE OLIVEIRA CUNHA","doi":"10.35265/2236-6717-237-12683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article intends to present the procedural system as a coordination mechanism of State action, which fits within the separation of powers, and it is a response to the paradoxical cases arising from post-modern society. In this way, the limits of constitutional law resulting from post-modern complexity will be presented, along with the problem of paradoxical cases, which are not those called \"hard cases\", and the paradigm of proceduralization as a measure of contemporary constitutional democracy. In addition, the stages and aspects of social structural construction that have built post-modern society will be presented, and that have raised the social problems of litigious cases, whose Judiciary has full capacity to decide them, to undecidable cases, especially with the process of extinction of metanarratives and the transition from the society of organizations to the society of platforms.","PeriodicalId":21289,"journal":{"name":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A DEMOCRACIA CONSTITUCIONAL CONTEMPORÂNEA: ESTUDOS PRELIMINARES SOBRE A PROCEDURALIZAÇÃO\",\"authors\":\"Matheus DE OLIVEIRA CUNHA\",\"doi\":\"10.35265/2236-6717-237-12683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article intends to present the procedural system as a coordination mechanism of State action, which fits within the separation of powers, and it is a response to the paradoxical cases arising from post-modern society. In this way, the limits of constitutional law resulting from post-modern complexity will be presented, along with the problem of paradoxical cases, which are not those called \\\"hard cases\\\", and the paradigm of proceduralization as a measure of contemporary constitutional democracy. In addition, the stages and aspects of social structural construction that have built post-modern society will be presented, and that have raised the social problems of litigious cases, whose Judiciary has full capacity to decide them, to undecidable cases, especially with the process of extinction of metanarratives and the transition from the society of organizations to the society of platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-237-12683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-237-12683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在将程序制度作为一种国家行动的协调机制呈现出来,它符合三权分立的要求,是对后现代社会中出现的矛盾案例的回应。通过这种方式,将呈现出后现代复杂性所导致的宪法的局限性,以及悖论案例(不是所谓的“硬案例”)的问题,以及作为当代宪政民主衡量标准的程序化范式。此外,还将呈现构建后现代社会的社会结构建构的阶段和方面,以及这些阶段和方面将诉讼案件的社会问题,特别是随着元叙事的消亡和从组织社会向平台社会的过渡,司法机构完全有能力裁决这些案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A DEMOCRACIA CONSTITUCIONAL CONTEMPORÂNEA: ESTUDOS PRELIMINARES SOBRE A PROCEDURALIZAÇÃO
This article intends to present the procedural system as a coordination mechanism of State action, which fits within the separation of powers, and it is a response to the paradoxical cases arising from post-modern society. In this way, the limits of constitutional law resulting from post-modern complexity will be presented, along with the problem of paradoxical cases, which are not those called "hard cases", and the paradigm of proceduralization as a measure of contemporary constitutional democracy. In addition, the stages and aspects of social structural construction that have built post-modern society will be presented, and that have raised the social problems of litigious cases, whose Judiciary has full capacity to decide them, to undecidable cases, especially with the process of extinction of metanarratives and the transition from the society of organizations to the society of platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
QUALIDADE DA ENERGIA ELÉTRICA EM UMA MICRORREDE TRIFÁSICA ISOLADA FORMADA POR INVERSORES BIDIRECIONAIS AGREGANDO GERAÇÃO FOTOVOLTAICA DISTRIBUÍDA ESTRATÉGIAS E DESAFIOS NA GESTÃO DE PESSOAS NO SERVIÇO PÚBLICO FEDERAL UMA REVISÃO BIBLIOGRÁFICA SEGURANÇA CIBERNÉTICA - ESTUDO DAS TÉCNICAS DE ATAQUES CIBERNÉTICOS (PHISHING, RANSMWARE, DDOS) DE ENGENHARIA SOCIAL E MEDIDAS DE PREVENÇÃO FATORES DE RISCO PARA SÍNDROME METABÓLICA EM ADULTOS NO BRASIL PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE FORTALECIMENTO DOS CONSELHOS ESCOLARES: A POLÍTICA DE FORMAÇÃO PARA CONSELHEIROS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1