组织教学法:通过激进的研究和行动超越校园运动的界限

IF 3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of the Learning Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/10508406.2023.2165082
Christopher R. Rogers, Benjamin M. Mendelsohn, Krystal Strong
{"title":"组织教学法:通过激进的研究和行动超越校园运动的界限","authors":"Christopher R. Rogers, Benjamin M. Mendelsohn, Krystal Strong","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2023.2165082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background This article considers the speculative and pedagogical character of campus abolitionist organizing. Extending education research into the knowledge (re)producing functions of radical activism, we draw upon the Black Radical Tradition to theorize the intersections of learning and imagination in both activism and education. Method The article centers an autoethnographic case study emerging from the authors’ experiences at University of Pennsylvania and their conflicted positions as campus organizers and educational laborers. Centering a direct action around university reparations, the paper draws on recollections of the event and its preparations as well as audiovisual and written documentation. Findings Analyzing our experiences as educational laborers and organizers struggling toward liberation, we document movement-driven learning practices and strategies for navigating contradictions between the university’s professed public mission and the realities of its exploitation of neighboring communities, which has been the focus of national campus organizing in the wake of the 2020 protests for racial justice. Contribution We offer the concept of organizing pedagogies to foreground the role of activism in producing and disseminating knowledge and fostering contexts for collective learning, as well as the role of the radical imagination in shaping activist educators’ mobilizations to advance freedom struggles within and beyond campus.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":"82 1","pages":"143 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizing pedagogies: Transgressing campus-movement boundaries through radical study and action\",\"authors\":\"Christopher R. Rogers, Benjamin M. Mendelsohn, Krystal Strong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10508406.2023.2165082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background This article considers the speculative and pedagogical character of campus abolitionist organizing. Extending education research into the knowledge (re)producing functions of radical activism, we draw upon the Black Radical Tradition to theorize the intersections of learning and imagination in both activism and education. Method The article centers an autoethnographic case study emerging from the authors’ experiences at University of Pennsylvania and their conflicted positions as campus organizers and educational laborers. Centering a direct action around university reparations, the paper draws on recollections of the event and its preparations as well as audiovisual and written documentation. Findings Analyzing our experiences as educational laborers and organizers struggling toward liberation, we document movement-driven learning practices and strategies for navigating contradictions between the university’s professed public mission and the realities of its exploitation of neighboring communities, which has been the focus of national campus organizing in the wake of the 2020 protests for racial justice. Contribution We offer the concept of organizing pedagogies to foreground the role of activism in producing and disseminating knowledge and fostering contexts for collective learning, as well as the role of the radical imagination in shaping activist educators’ mobilizations to advance freedom struggles within and beyond campus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Learning Sciences\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"143 - 169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Learning Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2023.2165082\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2023.2165082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景:本文探讨了校园废奴组织的思辨性和教育性。将教育研究扩展到激进行动主义的知识(再)生产功能,我们借鉴黑人激进传统来理论化行动主义和教育中学习和想象的交叉点。方法以作者在宾夕法尼亚大学的亲身经历和作为校园组织者和教育工作者的矛盾身份为中心,进行自我民族志案例研究。围绕大学赔偿的直接行动,本文借鉴了对事件及其准备工作的回忆,以及视听和书面文件。我们分析了我们作为教育工作者和争取解放的组织者的经历,记录了运动驱动的学习实践和策略,以应对大学宣称的公共使命与剥削邻近社区的现实之间的矛盾,这是2020年种族正义抗议活动之后全国校园组织的焦点。我们提出了组织教学法的概念,以突出激进主义在生产和传播知识和培养集体学习环境中的作用,以及激进想象力在塑造激进主义教育者的动员中所起的作用,以推动校园内外的自由斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Organizing pedagogies: Transgressing campus-movement boundaries through radical study and action
ABSTRACT Background This article considers the speculative and pedagogical character of campus abolitionist organizing. Extending education research into the knowledge (re)producing functions of radical activism, we draw upon the Black Radical Tradition to theorize the intersections of learning and imagination in both activism and education. Method The article centers an autoethnographic case study emerging from the authors’ experiences at University of Pennsylvania and their conflicted positions as campus organizers and educational laborers. Centering a direct action around university reparations, the paper draws on recollections of the event and its preparations as well as audiovisual and written documentation. Findings Analyzing our experiences as educational laborers and organizers struggling toward liberation, we document movement-driven learning practices and strategies for navigating contradictions between the university’s professed public mission and the realities of its exploitation of neighboring communities, which has been the focus of national campus organizing in the wake of the 2020 protests for racial justice. Contribution We offer the concept of organizing pedagogies to foreground the role of activism in producing and disseminating knowledge and fostering contexts for collective learning, as well as the role of the radical imagination in shaping activist educators’ mobilizations to advance freedom struggles within and beyond campus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS) is one of the two official journals of the International Society of the Learning Sciences ( www.isls.org). JLS provides a multidisciplinary forum for research on education and learning that informs theories of how people learn and the design of learning environments. It publishes research that elucidates processes of learning, and the ways in which technologies, instructional practices, and learning environments can be designed to support learning in different contexts. JLS articles draw on theoretical frameworks from such diverse fields as cognitive science, sociocultural theory, educational psychology, computer science, and anthropology. Submissions are not limited to any particular research method, but must be based on rigorous analyses that present new insights into how people learn and/or how learning can be supported and enhanced. Successful submissions should position their argument within extant literature in the learning sciences. They should reflect the core practices and foci that have defined the learning sciences as a field: privileging design in methodology and pedagogy; emphasizing interdisciplinarity and methodological innovation; grounding research in real-world contexts; answering questions about learning process and mechanism, alongside outcomes; pursuing technological and pedagogical innovation; and maintaining a strong connection between research and practice.
期刊最新文献
Reframing design in education: Proposing a framework to support pre-service teachers in adopting designerly stances The role of individual preparation before collaboration: An exploratory study on students’ computer-supported collaborative argumentation in a primary classroom Toward epistemic justice in socio-scientific decision-making: How youth make sense of lively COVID-19 and vaccines data Learning and constructions of us and them in teachers’ collaborative groups Interdisciplinary learning in the humanities: Knowledge building and identity work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1