Ahmet Akici, Dieudonné Havyarimana, Ertan Direnc, Volkan Aydin
{"title":"土耳其的药物使用研究:系统回顾。","authors":"Ahmet Akici, Dieudonné Havyarimana, Ertan Direnc, Volkan Aydin","doi":"10.14744/nci.2023.60134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Drug utilization studies (DUS) provide a framework for drug utilization at the national or targeted population level and important information on unmet medical needs, particularly in assessing the rationality of drug use. We aimed to systematically review DUS conducted in Turkiye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 162 DUS with an accessible full-text, published as \"research articles\" and conducted in Turkiye between 2000 and 2021 using medical records and prescription data. We included English or Turkish papers with English abstracts. We examined the scientific characteristics of the publications, source of the data, place/time of collection, research designs, and studied drug groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 79.6% of articles were in English, 45.1% were listed in SCI/SCIE, and 63.0% were on the WOS platform with 3.5 (interquartile range: 1-15) citations. The mean study period and publication time were 2.9±3.1 and 2.9±2.1 years, respectively. The highest number of studies (17.9%) were published in 2021 and (26.5%) were conducted nationwide. We identified that 93.8% of the studies had retrospective design, 67.8% were conducted in secondary/tertiary health-care institutions, and 54.9% used direct hospital data. We detected that 68.5% of the studies were conducted on the general population, 19.1% on adults, 12.4% on children, and 44.4% were antibiotic oriented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that a significant portion of the DUS, the trend of which has gained momentum in recent years, was antibiotic focused and conducted with a retrospective design from hospital-based data collected on the general patient population. This situation points to the necessity of expanding the existing DUS range by effectively using the new advantages provided by medical record databases and conducting more DUS that can provide critical clues for specific patients and drug groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19164,"journal":{"name":"Northern Clinics of Istanbul","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10861429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug utilization studies in Turkiye: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Akici, Dieudonné Havyarimana, Ertan Direnc, Volkan Aydin\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/nci.2023.60134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Drug utilization studies (DUS) provide a framework for drug utilization at the national or targeted population level and important information on unmet medical needs, particularly in assessing the rationality of drug use. We aimed to systematically review DUS conducted in Turkiye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 162 DUS with an accessible full-text, published as \\\"research articles\\\" and conducted in Turkiye between 2000 and 2021 using medical records and prescription data. We included English or Turkish papers with English abstracts. We examined the scientific characteristics of the publications, source of the data, place/time of collection, research designs, and studied drug groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 79.6% of articles were in English, 45.1% were listed in SCI/SCIE, and 63.0% were on the WOS platform with 3.5 (interquartile range: 1-15) citations. The mean study period and publication time were 2.9±3.1 and 2.9±2.1 years, respectively. The highest number of studies (17.9%) were published in 2021 and (26.5%) were conducted nationwide. We identified that 93.8% of the studies had retrospective design, 67.8% were conducted in secondary/tertiary health-care institutions, and 54.9% used direct hospital data. We detected that 68.5% of the studies were conducted on the general population, 19.1% on adults, 12.4% on children, and 44.4% were antibiotic oriented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that a significant portion of the DUS, the trend of which has gained momentum in recent years, was antibiotic focused and conducted with a retrospective design from hospital-based data collected on the general patient population. This situation points to the necessity of expanding the existing DUS range by effectively using the new advantages provided by medical record databases and conducting more DUS that can provide critical clues for specific patients and drug groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northern Clinics of Istanbul\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10861429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northern Clinics of Istanbul\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.60134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern Clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.60134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:药物利用研究(DUS)为全国或目标人群的药物利用提供了一个框架,并提供了有关未满足医疗需求的重要信息,尤其是在评估药物使用的合理性方面。我们旨在对土耳其进行的 DUS 进行系统回顾:我们利用医疗记录和处方数据,对 2000 年至 2021 年期间在土耳其进行的 162 篇可查阅全文的 DUS 进行了研究。我们收录了附有英文摘要的英文或土耳其文论文。我们研究了出版物的科学特征、数据来源、收集地点/时间、研究设计和研究药物组别:结果:我们发现79.6%的文章为英文,45.1%的文章被SCI/SCIE收录,63.0%的文章在WOS平台上发表,引用次数为3.5次(四分位间范围:1-15次)。平均研究时间(2.9±3.1)年,平均发表时间(2.9±2.1)年。发表于 2021 年的研究数量最多(17.9%),在全国范围内开展的研究数量最多(26.5%)。我们发现,93.8%的研究采用回顾性设计,67.8%的研究在二级/三级医疗机构进行,54.9%的研究直接使用医院数据。我们发现,68.5%的研究针对普通人群,19.1%针对成人,12.4%针对儿童,44.4%以抗生素为导向:我们的研究表明,近年来DUS的发展趋势是以抗生素为重点,并根据医院收集的普通患者数据进行回顾性设计。这种情况表明,有必要有效利用病历数据库提供的新优势,扩大现有的 DUS 范围,开展更多的 DUS,为特定患者和药物组提供重要线索。
Drug utilization studies in Turkiye: A systematic review.
Objective: Drug utilization studies (DUS) provide a framework for drug utilization at the national or targeted population level and important information on unmet medical needs, particularly in assessing the rationality of drug use. We aimed to systematically review DUS conducted in Turkiye.
Methods: We examined 162 DUS with an accessible full-text, published as "research articles" and conducted in Turkiye between 2000 and 2021 using medical records and prescription data. We included English or Turkish papers with English abstracts. We examined the scientific characteristics of the publications, source of the data, place/time of collection, research designs, and studied drug groups.
Results: We found that 79.6% of articles were in English, 45.1% were listed in SCI/SCIE, and 63.0% were on the WOS platform with 3.5 (interquartile range: 1-15) citations. The mean study period and publication time were 2.9±3.1 and 2.9±2.1 years, respectively. The highest number of studies (17.9%) were published in 2021 and (26.5%) were conducted nationwide. We identified that 93.8% of the studies had retrospective design, 67.8% were conducted in secondary/tertiary health-care institutions, and 54.9% used direct hospital data. We detected that 68.5% of the studies were conducted on the general population, 19.1% on adults, 12.4% on children, and 44.4% were antibiotic oriented.
Conclusion: Our study showed that a significant portion of the DUS, the trend of which has gained momentum in recent years, was antibiotic focused and conducted with a retrospective design from hospital-based data collected on the general patient population. This situation points to the necessity of expanding the existing DUS range by effectively using the new advantages provided by medical record databases and conducting more DUS that can provide critical clues for specific patients and drug groups.