第一章:国防与军事分析

Q3 Social Sciences The Military Balance Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/04597222.2020.1707961
{"title":"第一章:国防与军事分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/04597222.2020.1707961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"wars under modern high-technology conditions’. The Kosovo intervention led to a study by China’s National Defence University (NDU). This study, analysts noted, highlighted the centrality of ‘information superiority’ and paid close attention to how NATO forces used technology to suppress Serbia’s command centre and telecommunications. China’s 2004 defence white paper reflected the lessons drawn from Kosovo, and perhaps also Iraq in 2003. China’s armed forces aspired, it said, to win ‘local wars under informatised conditions’, giving priority to ‘building joint operational capabilities’. The assessment of the white paper was that information connects military domains and acts as a force multiplier but could also lead to more integrated force development. China’s 2015 defence white paper assessed that China’s external environment was going through ‘profound changes’ and that threats were more diverse – and not necessarily local or indeed short term. China would, it said, take advantage of a period of strategic opportunity to build strong military forces. This white paper highlighted the increasing sophistication of long-range, precise, stealthy and uninhabited weapons and equipment, also noting that outer space and cyberspace were ‘new commanding heights’ in strategic competition. Ultimately, it noted, ‘the form of war is accelerating its evolution to informatisation’. In October 2017, Xi delivered a speech at the 19th Chinese Communist Party Congress in which he set out a timeline for the PLA to achieve its modernisation goals. By 2020, mechanisation should be ‘basically achieved’, ‘information technology (IT) application’ should also have progressed and strategic capabilities should have seen significant improvement. By 2035, he said, ‘basic modernisation of our national defense and our forces’ should be ‘basically’ complete, and at the same time the PLA should have modernised their ‘theory, organisational structures, service personnel and weaponry’. By the middle of the next century (perhaps 2049, the 100th anniversary of the People’s Republic), he said the PLA should have fully transformed into ‘world-class’ forces. China’s military modernisation has accelerated under President Xi Jinping. It is a central component of the ‘China Dream’, articulated by Xi in 2013. As part of this ambition, Xi has driven far-reaching reforms to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) that have changed defence structures and led to the integration of improved military equipment, and which Beijing says will generate ‘world-class’ military forces by 2049. Three terms appear often in recent Chinese military documentation: mechanisation (机械化), informatisation (信息化) and, more recently, intelligentisation (智能化). Although the PLA has not clearly defined these concepts in public, they have been developed over time in successive defence white papers and are useful in understanding not only China’s motivations, progress and aspirations as it modernises its military forces, but also the PLA’s views of contemporary and future conflict. Some of Beijing’s efforts likely hinge on its capacity to introduce and exploit networked platforms, sensors and weapons that can support not only better and more integrated command-and-control (C2) systems but potentially also over-the-horizon targeting at extended ranges.","PeriodicalId":35165,"journal":{"name":"The Military Balance","volume":"62 1","pages":"20 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter One: Defence and military analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/04597222.2020.1707961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"wars under modern high-technology conditions’. The Kosovo intervention led to a study by China’s National Defence University (NDU). This study, analysts noted, highlighted the centrality of ‘information superiority’ and paid close attention to how NATO forces used technology to suppress Serbia’s command centre and telecommunications. China’s 2004 defence white paper reflected the lessons drawn from Kosovo, and perhaps also Iraq in 2003. China’s armed forces aspired, it said, to win ‘local wars under informatised conditions’, giving priority to ‘building joint operational capabilities’. The assessment of the white paper was that information connects military domains and acts as a force multiplier but could also lead to more integrated force development. China’s 2015 defence white paper assessed that China’s external environment was going through ‘profound changes’ and that threats were more diverse – and not necessarily local or indeed short term. China would, it said, take advantage of a period of strategic opportunity to build strong military forces. This white paper highlighted the increasing sophistication of long-range, precise, stealthy and uninhabited weapons and equipment, also noting that outer space and cyberspace were ‘new commanding heights’ in strategic competition. Ultimately, it noted, ‘the form of war is accelerating its evolution to informatisation’. In October 2017, Xi delivered a speech at the 19th Chinese Communist Party Congress in which he set out a timeline for the PLA to achieve its modernisation goals. By 2020, mechanisation should be ‘basically achieved’, ‘information technology (IT) application’ should also have progressed and strategic capabilities should have seen significant improvement. By 2035, he said, ‘basic modernisation of our national defense and our forces’ should be ‘basically’ complete, and at the same time the PLA should have modernised their ‘theory, organisational structures, service personnel and weaponry’. By the middle of the next century (perhaps 2049, the 100th anniversary of the People’s Republic), he said the PLA should have fully transformed into ‘world-class’ forces. China’s military modernisation has accelerated under President Xi Jinping. It is a central component of the ‘China Dream’, articulated by Xi in 2013. As part of this ambition, Xi has driven far-reaching reforms to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) that have changed defence structures and led to the integration of improved military equipment, and which Beijing says will generate ‘world-class’ military forces by 2049. Three terms appear often in recent Chinese military documentation: mechanisation (机械化), informatisation (信息化) and, more recently, intelligentisation (智能化). Although the PLA has not clearly defined these concepts in public, they have been developed over time in successive defence white papers and are useful in understanding not only China’s motivations, progress and aspirations as it modernises its military forces, but also the PLA’s views of contemporary and future conflict. Some of Beijing’s efforts likely hinge on its capacity to introduce and exploit networked platforms, sensors and weapons that can support not only better and more integrated command-and-control (C2) systems but potentially also over-the-horizon targeting at extended ranges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Military Balance\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"20 - 9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Military Balance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/04597222.2020.1707961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Military Balance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04597222.2020.1707961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代高科技条件下的战争”。科索沃干预引发了中国国防大学(NDU)的一项研究。分析人士指出,这项研究强调了“信息优势”的中心地位,并密切关注北约部队如何利用技术压制塞尔维亚的指挥中心和电信。中国2004年的国防白皮书反映了从科索沃、或许还有2003年的伊拉克汲取的教训。它说,中国武装部队渴望赢得“信息化条件下的局部战争”,优先考虑“建设联合作战能力”。白皮书的评价是,信息将军事领域连接起来,起到力量倍增器的作用,但也可能导致更综合的力量发展。中国2015年的国防白皮书评估称,中国的外部环境正在发生“深刻变化”,威胁更加多样化——而且不一定是局部的,也不一定是短期的。报告称,中国将利用战略机遇期建设强大的军事力量。这份白皮书强调了远程、精确、隐身和无人武器装备的日益复杂,并指出外太空和网络空间是战略竞争的“新制高点”。最后,报告指出,“战争形式正在加速向信息化演变”。到2020年,机械化基本实现,信息化取得进展,战略能力明显提高。他说,到2035年,“我们的国防和军队的基本现代化”应该“基本”完成,与此同时,人民解放军应该实现“理论现代化,组织结构现代化,服务人员现代化和武器现代化”。他说,到下个世纪中叶(可能是2049年,中华人民共和国成立100周年),解放军应该完全转变为“世界级”力量。三个术语经常出现在最近的中国军事文件中:机械化,信息化和最近的智能化。尽管解放军没有在公开场合明确定义这些概念,但随着时间的推移,这些概念在连续的国防白皮书中得到了发展,它们不仅有助于理解中国军队现代化的动机、进展和愿望,而且有助于理解解放军对当代和未来冲突的看法。北京的一些努力可能取决于其引进和利用网络平台、传感器和武器的能力,这些平台、传感器和武器不仅可以支持更好、更集成的指挥和控制(C2)系统,还可能支持扩展范围的超视距瞄准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chapter One: Defence and military analysis
wars under modern high-technology conditions’. The Kosovo intervention led to a study by China’s National Defence University (NDU). This study, analysts noted, highlighted the centrality of ‘information superiority’ and paid close attention to how NATO forces used technology to suppress Serbia’s command centre and telecommunications. China’s 2004 defence white paper reflected the lessons drawn from Kosovo, and perhaps also Iraq in 2003. China’s armed forces aspired, it said, to win ‘local wars under informatised conditions’, giving priority to ‘building joint operational capabilities’. The assessment of the white paper was that information connects military domains and acts as a force multiplier but could also lead to more integrated force development. China’s 2015 defence white paper assessed that China’s external environment was going through ‘profound changes’ and that threats were more diverse – and not necessarily local or indeed short term. China would, it said, take advantage of a period of strategic opportunity to build strong military forces. This white paper highlighted the increasing sophistication of long-range, precise, stealthy and uninhabited weapons and equipment, also noting that outer space and cyberspace were ‘new commanding heights’ in strategic competition. Ultimately, it noted, ‘the form of war is accelerating its evolution to informatisation’. In October 2017, Xi delivered a speech at the 19th Chinese Communist Party Congress in which he set out a timeline for the PLA to achieve its modernisation goals. By 2020, mechanisation should be ‘basically achieved’, ‘information technology (IT) application’ should also have progressed and strategic capabilities should have seen significant improvement. By 2035, he said, ‘basic modernisation of our national defense and our forces’ should be ‘basically’ complete, and at the same time the PLA should have modernised their ‘theory, organisational structures, service personnel and weaponry’. By the middle of the next century (perhaps 2049, the 100th anniversary of the People’s Republic), he said the PLA should have fully transformed into ‘world-class’ forces. China’s military modernisation has accelerated under President Xi Jinping. It is a central component of the ‘China Dream’, articulated by Xi in 2013. As part of this ambition, Xi has driven far-reaching reforms to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) that have changed defence structures and led to the integration of improved military equipment, and which Beijing says will generate ‘world-class’ military forces by 2049. Three terms appear often in recent Chinese military documentation: mechanisation (机械化), informatisation (信息化) and, more recently, intelligentisation (智能化). Although the PLA has not clearly defined these concepts in public, they have been developed over time in successive defence white papers and are useful in understanding not only China’s motivations, progress and aspirations as it modernises its military forces, but also the PLA’s views of contemporary and future conflict. Some of Beijing’s efforts likely hinge on its capacity to introduce and exploit networked platforms, sensors and weapons that can support not only better and more integrated command-and-control (C2) systems but potentially also over-the-horizon targeting at extended ranges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Military Balance
The Military Balance Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Chapter Three: North America The 2023 Military Balance Chart: Military space assets: China, Russia and the United States Chapter Six: Asia Index of country/territory abbreviations Chapter Five: Russia and Eurasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1