工程教育研究之旅

Jillian Seniuk Cicek, Jeffrey W. Paul, Renato Bezerra Rodrigues, P. Sheridan, R. Paul
{"title":"工程教育研究之旅","authors":"Jillian Seniuk Cicek, Jeffrey W. Paul, Renato Bezerra Rodrigues, P. Sheridan, R. Paul","doi":"10.1080/22054952.2023.2219576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Researchers face tensions as they journey into the field of Engineering Education Research (EER). Central to these tensions is the spectrum between the philosophical foundations of STEM-based engineering and Social Science-based education, which create internal and external challenges in the field. EER researchers must traverse the epistemological tension and the boundaries between disparate disciplines. As such, they may find themselves working on the fringes of EER’s parent disciplines (Engineering and Education) and not fully belonging to any community. This theoretical article draws on EER literature, several theoretical frameworks, and the research and lived experiences of the authors, two academics and three doctoral students who have journeyed into EER in Canada. It provides insights to new researchers to help them understand the nature of some of the struggles they may experience journeying into EER, awareness for more established researchers who may be already acquainted with the tensions, and critical context for universities and organisations wishing to build EER capability to inform the supports that new and existing EER researchers could use to thrive in EER communities.","PeriodicalId":38191,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Journeying into Engineering Education Research\",\"authors\":\"Jillian Seniuk Cicek, Jeffrey W. Paul, Renato Bezerra Rodrigues, P. Sheridan, R. Paul\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22054952.2023.2219576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Researchers face tensions as they journey into the field of Engineering Education Research (EER). Central to these tensions is the spectrum between the philosophical foundations of STEM-based engineering and Social Science-based education, which create internal and external challenges in the field. EER researchers must traverse the epistemological tension and the boundaries between disparate disciplines. As such, they may find themselves working on the fringes of EER’s parent disciplines (Engineering and Education) and not fully belonging to any community. This theoretical article draws on EER literature, several theoretical frameworks, and the research and lived experiences of the authors, two academics and three doctoral students who have journeyed into EER in Canada. It provides insights to new researchers to help them understand the nature of some of the struggles they may experience journeying into EER, awareness for more established researchers who may be already acquainted with the tensions, and critical context for universities and organisations wishing to build EER capability to inform the supports that new and existing EER researchers could use to thrive in EER communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2023.2219576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2023.2219576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员在进入工程教育研究(EER)领域的过程中面临着紧张的局面。这些紧张关系的核心是基于stem的工程和基于社会科学的教育的哲学基础之间的范围,这在该领域造成了内部和外部的挑战。EER研究人员必须跨越不同学科之间的认识论张力和边界。因此,他们可能会发现自己在EER的母学科(工程和教育)的边缘工作,并且不完全属于任何社区。这篇理论文章借鉴了EER文献,几个理论框架,以及作者的研究和生活经历,两位学者和三位博士生在加拿大旅行到EER。它为新的研究人员提供了见解,帮助他们了解他们可能经历的一些斗争的性质,他们可能已经熟悉了紧张局势的更成熟的研究人员的意识,以及希望建立EER能力的大学和组织的关键背景,以告知新的和现有的EER研究人员可以在EER社区中茁壮成长的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Journeying into Engineering Education Research
ABSTRACT Researchers face tensions as they journey into the field of Engineering Education Research (EER). Central to these tensions is the spectrum between the philosophical foundations of STEM-based engineering and Social Science-based education, which create internal and external challenges in the field. EER researchers must traverse the epistemological tension and the boundaries between disparate disciplines. As such, they may find themselves working on the fringes of EER’s parent disciplines (Engineering and Education) and not fully belonging to any community. This theoretical article draws on EER literature, several theoretical frameworks, and the research and lived experiences of the authors, two academics and three doctoral students who have journeyed into EER in Canada. It provides insights to new researchers to help them understand the nature of some of the struggles they may experience journeying into EER, awareness for more established researchers who may be already acquainted with the tensions, and critical context for universities and organisations wishing to build EER capability to inform the supports that new and existing EER researchers could use to thrive in EER communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: an updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering Development of the Bipolar Junction Transistor Diagnostic Test (BJTDT) to explore the second-year undergraduate Myanmar electronic and Thai electrical engineering students’ understanding of BJT working principles and applications Unfolding learning difficulties in engineering drawing problem solving Unfolding learning difficulties in engineering drawing problem solving Recontextualising the teaching learning cycle within engineering education to improve the development of written communication skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1