词典作为排除和包含的工具:一些南非词典就是一个很好的例子

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS LEXICOGRAPHICA Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1515/lex-2022-0003
R. Gouws
{"title":"词典作为排除和包含的工具:一些南非词典就是一个很好的例子","authors":"R. Gouws","doi":"10.1515/lex-2022-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As utility tools dictionaries should convey data in an impartial way. Lexicographers should not impose either their subjective view or some prevailing ideologies on the users of the dictionary. This paper focuses on aspects of exclusion and othering in some South African dictionaries. Different types of exclusion in different types of dictionaries are shown but it is also shown how dictionaries contribute to processes of inclusion. The treatment of a single offensive racist word in different dictionaries is discussed and the lack of countering the insulting impact of the use of the word is criticized. A positive response to this problem by means of a policy for the treatment of sensitive words is also discussed.","PeriodicalId":29876,"journal":{"name":"LEXICOGRAPHICA","volume":"35 1","pages":"39 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dictionaries as instruments of exclusion and inclusion: some South African dictionaries as case in point\",\"authors\":\"R. Gouws\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/lex-2022-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As utility tools dictionaries should convey data in an impartial way. Lexicographers should not impose either their subjective view or some prevailing ideologies on the users of the dictionary. This paper focuses on aspects of exclusion and othering in some South African dictionaries. Different types of exclusion in different types of dictionaries are shown but it is also shown how dictionaries contribute to processes of inclusion. The treatment of a single offensive racist word in different dictionaries is discussed and the lack of countering the insulting impact of the use of the word is criticized. A positive response to this problem by means of a policy for the treatment of sensitive words is also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LEXICOGRAPHICA\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LEXICOGRAPHICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2022-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEXICOGRAPHICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2022-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

字典作为实用工具,应该公正地传递数据。词典编纂者不应该把他们的主观观点或某些流行的意识形态强加给词典的使用者。本文主要研究了一些南非词典中的排他词和其他词。在不同类型的字典中显示了不同类型的排除,但也显示了字典如何促进包含过程。讨论了不同词典中对一个具有攻击性的种族主义词汇的处理,并批评了该词汇使用所产生的侮辱性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dictionaries as instruments of exclusion and inclusion: some South African dictionaries as case in point
Abstract As utility tools dictionaries should convey data in an impartial way. Lexicographers should not impose either their subjective view or some prevailing ideologies on the users of the dictionary. This paper focuses on aspects of exclusion and othering in some South African dictionaries. Different types of exclusion in different types of dictionaries are shown but it is also shown how dictionaries contribute to processes of inclusion. The treatment of a single offensive racist word in different dictionaries is discussed and the lack of countering the insulting impact of the use of the word is criticized. A positive response to this problem by means of a policy for the treatment of sensitive words is also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LEXICOGRAPHICA
LEXICOGRAPHICA Multiple-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Culture in the OED online Phrases and Quotations From Great Britain to the Spanish Philippines via British India… and back Creating specialised dictionaries using LexO “Dictionaries and Society” – Conference Report about XX EURALEX in Mannheim Unpacking colonialist and racist ideologies in historical German lexicons: A critical analysis of the Afrika Hand-Lexikon (1885) and similar reference books
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1