{"title":"重症监护室的护理或烧伤","authors":"L. Michell","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2016.v32i2.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Burnout syndrome (BOS) is a common problem, affecting 25 60% of healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in the intensive care unit (ICU).[1] Recently an American Critical Care Societies’ collaborative statement called for action to improve the ICU working environment.[2] The core symptoms of BOS are emotional exhaustion, depersonalisations and perceived lack of personal accomplishment.[2] In a previous issue of this journal we published an editorial, ‘Crash and burn’, highlighting the problem of BOS and the closely associated condition of post-traumatic stress disorder in ICU personnel.[3] Several studies have identified stressful interactions with relatives as a factor that adds to the burden of this demanding workplace. The response of burnt-out doctors and nurses is to avoid or minimise contact with the relatives, particularly if they are perceived to be demanding or ‘difficult’. Understanding the needs of families can help us support families and, in doing so, help ourselves. Even when we are managing the most hopeless ICU patient, job satisfaction can be achieved by knowing that we have done the best we could to help a family cope with a stressful situation. In this issue we publish a study which used a grounded theory approach to establish the needs of the families of ICU patients.[4] Common themes that emerged were the need for information sharing, reassurance, consolidation, resources, and cultural and religious awareness. Helping families that have been thrust into an unfamiliar and frightening situation to survive emotionally requires an understanding of the coping mechanisms relatives adopt. Establishing trust between HCPs and relatives is the first essential step. This is not achieved if discordant information is being supplied. De Beer and Brysiewicz’s study[4] highlights the problem of contradictory information being supplied by different members of the ICU team. An earlier study[5] conducted in French ICUs also showed that consistent information was the most important factor associated with family satisfaction. Communication is a two-way street and involves not only informing the relatives of the patient’s condition in an appropriate and compassionate way but also listening to family members and allowing them time to voice their fears and concerns. Family conferences where relatives talk more than the doctor are rated as more satisfactory by the family.[6] The need for reassurance was another key theme that emergend from the study. This is not such a simple need to meet in the critically ill. It is our human instinct to reassure, and families are keen to grasp at any straw offered. Unfortunately, we have all seen apparently improving patients suddenly deteriorate, and the ensuing blame games that may follow. The opposite extreme, of being overly pessimistic, is also not appropriate as we should not deny the ‘right to hope’ as long as there is some justification for this. Perhaps the best approach is one of cautious optimism, while assuring families that everything possible is being done for their loved one. Providing suitable facilities for families who spend long hours in the ICU is often overlooked, especially in our cash-strapped state hospitals. Minimum requirements are comfortable bedside seating, a well-furnished waiting area and a separate private room for family conferences. An explanatory brochure about the ICU and sleep-over facilities is one of the additional suggestions from the current study.[4] We do the best we can for our patients, but in our hectic clinical lives we so often ignore the needs of families. Caring for their families is what patients want, and, in doing so, we are caring for ourselves.","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"11 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care or burn in the ICU\",\"authors\":\"L. Michell\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJCC.2016.v32i2.304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Burnout syndrome (BOS) is a common problem, affecting 25 60% of healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in the intensive care unit (ICU).[1] Recently an American Critical Care Societies’ collaborative statement called for action to improve the ICU working environment.[2] The core symptoms of BOS are emotional exhaustion, depersonalisations and perceived lack of personal accomplishment.[2] In a previous issue of this journal we published an editorial, ‘Crash and burn’, highlighting the problem of BOS and the closely associated condition of post-traumatic stress disorder in ICU personnel.[3] Several studies have identified stressful interactions with relatives as a factor that adds to the burden of this demanding workplace. The response of burnt-out doctors and nurses is to avoid or minimise contact with the relatives, particularly if they are perceived to be demanding or ‘difficult’. Understanding the needs of families can help us support families and, in doing so, help ourselves. Even when we are managing the most hopeless ICU patient, job satisfaction can be achieved by knowing that we have done the best we could to help a family cope with a stressful situation. In this issue we publish a study which used a grounded theory approach to establish the needs of the families of ICU patients.[4] Common themes that emerged were the need for information sharing, reassurance, consolidation, resources, and cultural and religious awareness. Helping families that have been thrust into an unfamiliar and frightening situation to survive emotionally requires an understanding of the coping mechanisms relatives adopt. Establishing trust between HCPs and relatives is the first essential step. This is not achieved if discordant information is being supplied. De Beer and Brysiewicz’s study[4] highlights the problem of contradictory information being supplied by different members of the ICU team. An earlier study[5] conducted in French ICUs also showed that consistent information was the most important factor associated with family satisfaction. Communication is a two-way street and involves not only informing the relatives of the patient’s condition in an appropriate and compassionate way but also listening to family members and allowing them time to voice their fears and concerns. Family conferences where relatives talk more than the doctor are rated as more satisfactory by the family.[6] The need for reassurance was another key theme that emergend from the study. This is not such a simple need to meet in the critically ill. It is our human instinct to reassure, and families are keen to grasp at any straw offered. Unfortunately, we have all seen apparently improving patients suddenly deteriorate, and the ensuing blame games that may follow. The opposite extreme, of being overly pessimistic, is also not appropriate as we should not deny the ‘right to hope’ as long as there is some justification for this. Perhaps the best approach is one of cautious optimism, while assuring families that everything possible is being done for their loved one. Providing suitable facilities for families who spend long hours in the ICU is often overlooked, especially in our cash-strapped state hospitals. Minimum requirements are comfortable bedside seating, a well-furnished waiting area and a separate private room for family conferences. An explanatory brochure about the ICU and sleep-over facilities is one of the additional suggestions from the current study.[4] We do the best we can for our patients, but in our hectic clinical lives we so often ignore the needs of families. Caring for their families is what patients want, and, in doing so, we are caring for ourselves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2016.v32i2.304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2016.v32i2.304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业倦怠综合征(BOS)是一种常见的问题,影响了在重症监护病房(ICU)工作的医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的25.60%最近,一份美国重症监护协会的合作声明呼吁采取行动改善ICU的工作环境BOS的核心症状是情绪耗竭、人格解体和感觉上缺乏个人成就感在本刊的前一期中,我们发表了一篇社论,“崩溃和烧伤”,强调了重症监护室人员的创伤后应激障碍问题和与之密切相关的创伤后应激障碍状况几项研究已经确定,与亲戚的紧张互动是增加这种高要求工作场所负担的一个因素。疲惫不堪的医生和护士的反应是避免或尽量减少与亲属的接触,特别是如果他们被认为要求很高或“难以相处”。了解家庭的需要可以帮助我们支持家庭,同时也帮助我们自己。即使当我们在管理最绝望的ICU病人时,知道我们已经尽了最大的努力来帮助一个家庭应对压力,我们也能获得工作满意度。在这一期,我们发表了一项研究,该研究采用扎根理论的方法来确定ICU患者家属的需求出现的共同主题是对信息共享、保证、巩固、资源以及文化和宗教意识的需求。帮助那些被推入陌生和可怕环境的家庭在情感上生存下来,需要了解亲属采用的应对机制。在医护人员和家属之间建立信任是必不可少的第一步。如果提供的信息不一致,这是无法实现的。De Beer和Brysiewicz的研究b[4]强调了ICU团队不同成员提供的相互矛盾的信息的问题。在法国icu进行的一项早期研究也表明,一致的信息是与家庭满意度相关的最重要因素。沟通是双向的,不仅要以适当和富有同情心的方式告知亲属患者的病情,还要倾听家属的意见,让他们有时间表达他们的恐惧和担忧。在家庭会议上,亲戚比医生说得多,家人认为更令人满意对安慰的需求是研究中出现的另一个关键主题。这不是危重病人需要满足的简单需求。让人放心是我们人类的本能,而家庭热衷于抓住任何一根救命稻草。不幸的是,我们都见过明显好转的病人突然恶化,随之而来的是指责游戏。相反的极端,过度悲观,也是不合适的,因为我们不应该否认“希望的权利”,只要有一些理由。也许最好的办法是保持谨慎的乐观,同时向家属保证,一切可能的事情都在为他们所爱的人做。为那些长时间呆在ICU的家庭提供合适的设施往往被忽视,特别是在我们资金紧张的州立医院。最低要求是舒适的床边座位,一个设备齐全的等候区和一个单独的私人房间用于家庭会议。一本关于ICU和过夜设施的说明性小册子是当前研究的另一个建议我们为病人尽了最大的努力,但在忙碌的临床生活中,我们常常忽略了家庭的需求。照顾他们的家人是病人想要的,在这样做的同时,我们也在照顾自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Care or burn in the ICU
Burnout syndrome (BOS) is a common problem, affecting 25 60% of healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in the intensive care unit (ICU).[1] Recently an American Critical Care Societies’ collaborative statement called for action to improve the ICU working environment.[2] The core symptoms of BOS are emotional exhaustion, depersonalisations and perceived lack of personal accomplishment.[2] In a previous issue of this journal we published an editorial, ‘Crash and burn’, highlighting the problem of BOS and the closely associated condition of post-traumatic stress disorder in ICU personnel.[3] Several studies have identified stressful interactions with relatives as a factor that adds to the burden of this demanding workplace. The response of burnt-out doctors and nurses is to avoid or minimise contact with the relatives, particularly if they are perceived to be demanding or ‘difficult’. Understanding the needs of families can help us support families and, in doing so, help ourselves. Even when we are managing the most hopeless ICU patient, job satisfaction can be achieved by knowing that we have done the best we could to help a family cope with a stressful situation. In this issue we publish a study which used a grounded theory approach to establish the needs of the families of ICU patients.[4] Common themes that emerged were the need for information sharing, reassurance, consolidation, resources, and cultural and religious awareness. Helping families that have been thrust into an unfamiliar and frightening situation to survive emotionally requires an understanding of the coping mechanisms relatives adopt. Establishing trust between HCPs and relatives is the first essential step. This is not achieved if discordant information is being supplied. De Beer and Brysiewicz’s study[4] highlights the problem of contradictory information being supplied by different members of the ICU team. An earlier study[5] conducted in French ICUs also showed that consistent information was the most important factor associated with family satisfaction. Communication is a two-way street and involves not only informing the relatives of the patient’s condition in an appropriate and compassionate way but also listening to family members and allowing them time to voice their fears and concerns. Family conferences where relatives talk more than the doctor are rated as more satisfactory by the family.[6] The need for reassurance was another key theme that emergend from the study. This is not such a simple need to meet in the critically ill. It is our human instinct to reassure, and families are keen to grasp at any straw offered. Unfortunately, we have all seen apparently improving patients suddenly deteriorate, and the ensuing blame games that may follow. The opposite extreme, of being overly pessimistic, is also not appropriate as we should not deny the ‘right to hope’ as long as there is some justification for this. Perhaps the best approach is one of cautious optimism, while assuring families that everything possible is being done for their loved one. Providing suitable facilities for families who spend long hours in the ICU is often overlooked, especially in our cash-strapped state hospitals. Minimum requirements are comfortable bedside seating, a well-furnished waiting area and a separate private room for family conferences. An explanatory brochure about the ICU and sleep-over facilities is one of the additional suggestions from the current study.[4] We do the best we can for our patients, but in our hectic clinical lives we so often ignore the needs of families. Caring for their families is what patients want, and, in doing so, we are caring for ourselves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relevance and application of clinical practice guidelines in different settings. Deep medicine … Navigating the intersection of technology, cognition and ethics in the digital age of medicine. The missed art of care? Prevalence and independent predictors of in-hospital stroke among patients who developed acute alteration of consciousness in the medical intensive care unit: A retrospective case-control study. Carbon dioxide levels of ventilated adult critically ill post-operative patients on arrival at the intensive care unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1