在监测良好的生态系统中记录变量相对影响的净生态系统交换比较分析

IF 3.1 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecological Complexity Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecocom.2022.100998
David A. Wood
{"title":"在监测良好的生态系统中记录变量相对影响的净生态系统交换比较分析","authors":"David A. Wood","doi":"10.1016/j.ecocom.2022.100998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Weekly averaged datasets from fourteen AmeriFlux ecosystem monitoring sites spread across the Americas, processed to the FLUXNET2015 standard, are statistically evaluated to characterize their seasonal net ecosystem exchange (NEE) trends. The sites cover wetland, cropland, woodland, grassland and tundra ecosystems. Up to twenty measured variables from the sites are variously correlated with NEE. A comparison of Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients reveals that the variables are behaving parametrically with respect to NEE for the wetland, woodland (two out of three sites) and tundra locations, but non-parametrically for cropland and grassland sites. Multi-linear regression (MLR) analysis also distinguishes those ecosystems. MLR predicted versus calculated NEE follow <em>Y</em> ≈ <em>X</em> relationships for the wetland and tundra sites, whereas for the other ecosystems the MLR results follow Y≠X trends. Moreover, the coefficient values of the MLR optimum solutions for each ecosystem reveal quite distinct relative influences of the measured variables on the NEE predicted values. These results imply that NEE at wetland and tundra sites can be relatively easily predicted from the FLUXNET2015 set of recorded variables. On the other hand, the other three types of ecosystem sites cannot be easily predicted from those variables, implying that other factors substantially influence NEE at those sites.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50559,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Complexity","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100998"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Net ecosystem exchange comparative analysis of the relative influence of recorded variables in well monitored ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"David A. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecocom.2022.100998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Weekly averaged datasets from fourteen AmeriFlux ecosystem monitoring sites spread across the Americas, processed to the FLUXNET2015 standard, are statistically evaluated to characterize their seasonal net ecosystem exchange (NEE) trends. The sites cover wetland, cropland, woodland, grassland and tundra ecosystems. Up to twenty measured variables from the sites are variously correlated with NEE. A comparison of Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients reveals that the variables are behaving parametrically with respect to NEE for the wetland, woodland (two out of three sites) and tundra locations, but non-parametrically for cropland and grassland sites. Multi-linear regression (MLR) analysis also distinguishes those ecosystems. MLR predicted versus calculated NEE follow <em>Y</em> ≈ <em>X</em> relationships for the wetland and tundra sites, whereas for the other ecosystems the MLR results follow Y≠X trends. Moreover, the coefficient values of the MLR optimum solutions for each ecosystem reveal quite distinct relative influences of the measured variables on the NEE predicted values. These results imply that NEE at wetland and tundra sites can be relatively easily predicted from the FLUXNET2015 set of recorded variables. On the other hand, the other three types of ecosystem sites cannot be easily predicted from those variables, implying that other factors substantially influence NEE at those sites.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Complexity\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476945X22000204\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476945X22000204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

来自美洲14个AmeriFlux生态系统监测点的每周平均数据集,经FLUXNET2015标准处理后,统计评估其季节性净生态系统交换(NEE)趋势。保护区包括湿地、农田、林地、草地和冻土带生态系统。来自这些站点的多达20个测量变量与NEE有不同的相关性。Pearson和Spearman相关系数的比较表明,湿地、林地(3个地点中的2个)和冻土带地点的NEE变量表现为参数化,而农田和草地地点的NEE变量表现为非参数化。多元线性回归(MLR)分析也对这些生态系统进行了区分。在湿地和冻土带样地,预测的新生态需要量MLR与计算的新生态需要量服从Y≈X的关系,而在其他生态系统中,MLR结果服从Y≠X的趋势。各生态系统的MLR最优解的系数值显示了不同测量变量对新能源经济性预测值的相对影响。这些结果表明,利用FLUXNET2015记录变量集可以相对容易地预测湿地和冻土带样地的NEE。另一方面,其他三种类型的生态系统站点不容易从这些变量中预测,这意味着其他因素在很大程度上影响了这些站点的新生态环境价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Net ecosystem exchange comparative analysis of the relative influence of recorded variables in well monitored ecosystems

Weekly averaged datasets from fourteen AmeriFlux ecosystem monitoring sites spread across the Americas, processed to the FLUXNET2015 standard, are statistically evaluated to characterize their seasonal net ecosystem exchange (NEE) trends. The sites cover wetland, cropland, woodland, grassland and tundra ecosystems. Up to twenty measured variables from the sites are variously correlated with NEE. A comparison of Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients reveals that the variables are behaving parametrically with respect to NEE for the wetland, woodland (two out of three sites) and tundra locations, but non-parametrically for cropland and grassland sites. Multi-linear regression (MLR) analysis also distinguishes those ecosystems. MLR predicted versus calculated NEE follow Y ≈ X relationships for the wetland and tundra sites, whereas for the other ecosystems the MLR results follow Y≠X trends. Moreover, the coefficient values of the MLR optimum solutions for each ecosystem reveal quite distinct relative influences of the measured variables on the NEE predicted values. These results imply that NEE at wetland and tundra sites can be relatively easily predicted from the FLUXNET2015 set of recorded variables. On the other hand, the other three types of ecosystem sites cannot be easily predicted from those variables, implying that other factors substantially influence NEE at those sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Complexity
Ecological Complexity 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Complexity is an international journal devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of biocomplexity in the environment, theoretical ecology, and special issues on topics of current interest. The scope of the journal is wide and interdisciplinary with an integrated and quantitative approach. The journal particularly encourages submission of papers that integrate natural and social processes at appropriately broad spatio-temporal scales. Ecological Complexity will publish research into the following areas: • All aspects of biocomplexity in the environment and theoretical ecology • Ecosystems and biospheres as complex adaptive systems • Self-organization of spatially extended ecosystems • Emergent properties and structures of complex ecosystems • Ecological pattern formation in space and time • The role of biophysical constraints and evolutionary attractors on species assemblages • Ecological scaling (scale invariance, scale covariance and across scale dynamics), allometry, and hierarchy theory • Ecological topology and networks • Studies towards an ecology of complex systems • Complex systems approaches for the study of dynamic human-environment interactions • Using knowledge of nonlinear phenomena to better guide policy development for adaptation strategies and mitigation to environmental change • New tools and methods for studying ecological complexity
期刊最新文献
Enhancing maximum sustainable yield in a patchy prey–predator environment A scale-invariant method for quantifying the regularity of environmental spatial patterns Assessing the ecological complexity and uncertainty of predicting forest ecosystem services under climate change Transitive and intransitive structures in competition-based ecological communities The central importance of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) within plant-bee interaction networks decreases along a Neotropical elevational gradient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1