“其他人”的病毒?阿拉伯媒体中的科罗娜与话语性他人

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1386/JAMMR_00022_1
Carola Richter, Abdulrahman Al-Shami, S. Khalīfa, Soheir A. Osman, Samuel Mundua
{"title":"“其他人”的病毒?阿拉伯媒体中的科罗娜与话语性他人","authors":"Carola Richter, Abdulrahman Al-Shami, S. Khalīfa, Soheir A. Osman, Samuel Mundua","doi":"10.1386/JAMMR_00022_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spread of fear of the coronavirus and related insecurities around the pandemic have fuelled nationalist and increased exclusionary tendencies in countries all over the world. In North America, for instance, anti-Asian racism increased when former US President Donald Trump dubbed the virus the ‘Chinese virus’. A nationalist agenda has been strengthened in many places, including the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region;and hateful narratives blaming ‘others’ for the pandemic, legitimizing a retreat to the protection of national borders and policies, are being spread in different media outlets. This article comparatively investigates processes of othering with regard to COVID-19 in four MENA countries – Egypt, Iraq, Oman and Yemen – and asks, who is held responsible for the coronavirus crisis in different countries? How is othering revealed in media coverage related to COVID-19? What (in)sensitive language can be identified? The study looks at mass media coverage at the peak of the global lockdown during the spring of 2020. The media analysis reveals a strong emphasis on mostly national identities as articulated lines of demarcation in all four cases. A homogenizing and demonizing othering was detected in particular in the cases of Yemen and Egypt, but also Iraq, when blame was attributed to political adversaries. The Omani case was characterized by a more subtle othering that focused strongly on the importance of citizenship. © 2021 Intellect Ltd Article. English language.","PeriodicalId":36098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The virus of the ‘others’? Corona and discursive othering in Arab media\",\"authors\":\"Carola Richter, Abdulrahman Al-Shami, S. Khalīfa, Soheir A. Osman, Samuel Mundua\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/JAMMR_00022_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The spread of fear of the coronavirus and related insecurities around the pandemic have fuelled nationalist and increased exclusionary tendencies in countries all over the world. In North America, for instance, anti-Asian racism increased when former US President Donald Trump dubbed the virus the ‘Chinese virus’. A nationalist agenda has been strengthened in many places, including the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region;and hateful narratives blaming ‘others’ for the pandemic, legitimizing a retreat to the protection of national borders and policies, are being spread in different media outlets. This article comparatively investigates processes of othering with regard to COVID-19 in four MENA countries – Egypt, Iraq, Oman and Yemen – and asks, who is held responsible for the coronavirus crisis in different countries? How is othering revealed in media coverage related to COVID-19? What (in)sensitive language can be identified? The study looks at mass media coverage at the peak of the global lockdown during the spring of 2020. The media analysis reveals a strong emphasis on mostly national identities as articulated lines of demarcation in all four cases. A homogenizing and demonizing othering was detected in particular in the cases of Yemen and Egypt, but also Iraq, when blame was attributed to political adversaries. The Omani case was characterized by a more subtle othering that focused strongly on the importance of citizenship. © 2021 Intellect Ltd Article. English language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/JAMMR_00022_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JAMMR_00022_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

对冠状病毒的恐惧蔓延以及围绕大流行的相关不安全感,助长了世界各国的民族主义,加剧了排斥倾向。例如,在北美,当美国前总统唐纳德·特朗普将这种病毒称为“中国病毒”时,反亚洲种族主义加剧。民族主义议程在包括中东和北非地区在内的许多地方得到加强;各种媒体正在传播将疫情归咎于“他人”的仇恨言论,使退回到保护国家边界和政策的做法合法化。本文比较调查了埃及、伊拉克、阿曼和也门四个中东和北非国家应对新冠肺炎疫情的处理过程,并提出了一个问题:在不同的国家,谁应该为新冠肺炎危机负责?与COVID-19相关的媒体报道如何披露其他人?哪些敏感语言可以被识别?该研究着眼于2020年春季全球封锁高峰期的大众媒体报道。媒体分析显示,在所有四个案例中,主要强调国家身份是明确的分界线。在也门和埃及的情况下,特别是在伊拉克的情况下,当指责归咎于政治对手时,发现了一种同质化和妖魔化他人的情况。阿曼案件的特点是一个更加微妙的问题,强烈强调公民身份的重要性。©2021 Intellect Ltd文章。英语语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The virus of the ‘others’? Corona and discursive othering in Arab media
The spread of fear of the coronavirus and related insecurities around the pandemic have fuelled nationalist and increased exclusionary tendencies in countries all over the world. In North America, for instance, anti-Asian racism increased when former US President Donald Trump dubbed the virus the ‘Chinese virus’. A nationalist agenda has been strengthened in many places, including the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region;and hateful narratives blaming ‘others’ for the pandemic, legitimizing a retreat to the protection of national borders and policies, are being spread in different media outlets. This article comparatively investigates processes of othering with regard to COVID-19 in four MENA countries – Egypt, Iraq, Oman and Yemen – and asks, who is held responsible for the coronavirus crisis in different countries? How is othering revealed in media coverage related to COVID-19? What (in)sensitive language can be identified? The study looks at mass media coverage at the peak of the global lockdown during the spring of 2020. The media analysis reveals a strong emphasis on mostly national identities as articulated lines of demarcation in all four cases. A homogenizing and demonizing othering was detected in particular in the cases of Yemen and Egypt, but also Iraq, when blame was attributed to political adversaries. The Omani case was characterized by a more subtle othering that focused strongly on the importance of citizenship. © 2021 Intellect Ltd Article. English language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research
Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Enhancing prosocial behaviour and donation intentions through neuroscientific techniques (EEG and eye tracker): Exploring the influence of charitable advertisement appeals Falsehood on social media in Egypt: Rumour detection and sentiment analysis of users’ comments Exploring Arab communication research: A systematic review from 2000 to 2021 Mediated mythical discourses: A critical analysis of the female docility and religious discourses in Indian TV soap operas Beauty hacks, wardrobe suggestions and DIY regimes for a Muslim bride: Analysis of bridal beauty vlogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1