单宁酸作为皂苷在土壤修复中的成本效益替代品

Z. Gusiatin, K. Bułkowska, T. Pokój
{"title":"单宁酸作为皂苷在土壤修复中的成本效益替代品","authors":"Z. Gusiatin, K. Bułkowska, T. Pokój","doi":"10.14799/EBMS240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency of soil washing with tannic acid (TA) and saponin (SAP) was compared. In the contaminated soil, Cu and Zn were more mobile than Pb. At 3% concentration, both biosurfactants removed similar amounts of Zn (48 and 54%, respectively), SAP removed somewhat more Cu (81%), and TA removed considerably more Pb (63%). SAP removed more Cu due to its","PeriodicalId":11733,"journal":{"name":"Environmental biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tannic acid as a cost ‑effective substitute for saponin in soil remediation\",\"authors\":\"Z. Gusiatin, K. Bułkowska, T. Pokój\",\"doi\":\"10.14799/EBMS240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The efficiency of soil washing with tannic acid (TA) and saponin (SAP) was compared. In the contaminated soil, Cu and Zn were more mobile than Pb. At 3% concentration, both biosurfactants removed similar amounts of Zn (48 and 54%, respectively), SAP removed somewhat more Cu (81%), and TA removed considerably more Pb (63%). SAP removed more Cu due to its\",\"PeriodicalId\":11733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental biotechnology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14799/EBMS240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14799/EBMS240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

比较了单宁酸(TA)和皂苷(SAP)的洗土效果。在污染土壤中,Cu和Zn的流动性大于Pb。在3%的浓度下,两种生物表面活性剂对Zn的去除率相近(分别为48%和54%),SAP对Cu的去除率略高(81%),TA对Pb的去除率相当高(63%)。SAP移除了更多的Cu
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tannic acid as a cost ‑effective substitute for saponin in soil remediation
The efficiency of soil washing with tannic acid (TA) and saponin (SAP) was compared. In the contaminated soil, Cu and Zn were more mobile than Pb. At 3% concentration, both biosurfactants removed similar amounts of Zn (48 and 54%, respectively), SAP removed somewhat more Cu (81%), and TA removed considerably more Pb (63%). SAP removed more Cu due to its
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nature-based and technology-based solutions for sustainable blue growth and climate change mitigation in marine biodiversity hotspots Exploring Baltic Sea cyanobacteria for small-molecule inhibitors of microRNA function: a project description New microsatellite multiplex PCR sets for genetic studies of the sterlet sturgeon, Acipenser ruthenus Measurement of bacterial adhesion to metal surfaces with different chemical composition - evaluation of different methods Treatment of simulated oil and gas production wastewater using Typha latifolia in a pilot-scale constructed wetland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1