Khorana风险评分在预测肺癌患者静脉血栓栓塞中的应用

Y. Havlucu, D. Kızılırmak
{"title":"Khorana风险评分在预测肺癌患者静脉血栓栓塞中的应用","authors":"Y. Havlucu, D. Kızılırmak","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2019.PA1468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Khorana risk score (KRS)is the validated risk assessment model to stratify risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) development in ambulatory patients with cancer. At this study we want to assess the predictive performance of KRS in patients with lung cancer. Methods: VTE events were retrospectively identified by reviewers unaware of the clinical prediction score calculation. The association between KRS and the risk of VTE was examined using cumulative incidence function with competing risks models. Results: We retrospectively analyzed patients with diagnosis of lung cancer at our clinic over ten years.912 patients with lung cancer were included study.98 patient were excluded from study due to various reasons. Among 814 patients with lung cancer,79(9,7%) cases of VTE were identified, including 61 (77,2%)pulmonary embolism,15 (19%)peripheral deep vein thrombosis, and 3(3,8%) thrombosis of other sites.A high KRS (cumulative incidence, 10,7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4,9-18,1%) was not associated with venous thromboembolism compared with an intermediate score(cumulative incidence, 9,8%; 95% confidence interval, 7,3-15,2%) in both univariate and multivariable analyses. Conclusions: By using khorona risk score, risk stratification (intermediate or high risk) of venous thromboembolism was not useful in patients with lung cancer.","PeriodicalId":20797,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary embolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Khorana Risk Score for Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Lung Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Y. Havlucu, D. Kızılırmak\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2019.PA1468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Khorana risk score (KRS)is the validated risk assessment model to stratify risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) development in ambulatory patients with cancer. At this study we want to assess the predictive performance of KRS in patients with lung cancer. Methods: VTE events were retrospectively identified by reviewers unaware of the clinical prediction score calculation. The association between KRS and the risk of VTE was examined using cumulative incidence function with competing risks models. Results: We retrospectively analyzed patients with diagnosis of lung cancer at our clinic over ten years.912 patients with lung cancer were included study.98 patient were excluded from study due to various reasons. Among 814 patients with lung cancer,79(9,7%) cases of VTE were identified, including 61 (77,2%)pulmonary embolism,15 (19%)peripheral deep vein thrombosis, and 3(3,8%) thrombosis of other sites.A high KRS (cumulative incidence, 10,7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4,9-18,1%) was not associated with venous thromboembolism compared with an intermediate score(cumulative incidence, 9,8%; 95% confidence interval, 7,3-15,2%) in both univariate and multivariable analyses. Conclusions: By using khorona risk score, risk stratification (intermediate or high risk) of venous thromboembolism was not useful in patients with lung cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary embolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary embolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2019.PA1468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary embolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2019.PA1468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:Khorana风险评分(KRS)是一种经过验证的风险评估模型,用于对非卧床癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生的风险进行分层。在这项研究中,我们想评估KRS在肺癌患者中的预测性能。方法:在不知道临床预测评分计算的情况下,回顾性地确定静脉血栓栓塞事件。使用具有竞争风险模型的累积关联函数来检验KRS与VTE风险之间的关联。结果:我们回顾性分析了十多年来本院诊断为肺癌的患者。912例肺癌患者纳入研究。98例患者因各种原因被排除在研究之外。814例肺癌患者中,发现静脉血栓栓塞79例(9.7%),其中肺栓塞61例(77.2%),外周深静脉血栓形成15例(19%),其他部位血栓形成3例(3.8%)。KRS高(累计发病率10.7%;95%可信区间[CI], 4,9-18,1%)与中间评分(累积发生率,9.8%;95%置信区间,7,3-15,2%),在单变量和多变量分析。结论:使用khorona风险评分,对肺癌患者进行静脉血栓栓塞风险分层(中高风险)无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of Khorana Risk Score for Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Lung Cancer
Background: The Khorana risk score (KRS)is the validated risk assessment model to stratify risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) development in ambulatory patients with cancer. At this study we want to assess the predictive performance of KRS in patients with lung cancer. Methods: VTE events were retrospectively identified by reviewers unaware of the clinical prediction score calculation. The association between KRS and the risk of VTE was examined using cumulative incidence function with competing risks models. Results: We retrospectively analyzed patients with diagnosis of lung cancer at our clinic over ten years.912 patients with lung cancer were included study.98 patient were excluded from study due to various reasons. Among 814 patients with lung cancer,79(9,7%) cases of VTE were identified, including 61 (77,2%)pulmonary embolism,15 (19%)peripheral deep vein thrombosis, and 3(3,8%) thrombosis of other sites.A high KRS (cumulative incidence, 10,7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4,9-18,1%) was not associated with venous thromboembolism compared with an intermediate score(cumulative incidence, 9,8%; 95% confidence interval, 7,3-15,2%) in both univariate and multivariable analyses. Conclusions: By using khorona risk score, risk stratification (intermediate or high risk) of venous thromboembolism was not useful in patients with lung cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Imaging Modalities in Venous-Thromboembolism: Ultrasound for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Imaging Modalities in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Computerized Tomography Integrating Clinical, Laboratory and Imaging Tests in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism Pulmonary Embolism: Information for the Patient and Family
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1