数字绿色证书——欧盟内部自由流动的保证还是歧视的手段?

I. Apetrei
{"title":"数字绿色证书——欧盟内部自由流动的保证还是歧视的手段?","authors":"I. Apetrei","doi":"10.18662/upalaw/64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to facilitate safe travel during the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Commission has proposed the creation of a Digital Green Certificate. This instrument refers to the 27 EU Member States and the non-EU states which are part of the Schengen Area (Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Lichtenstein), but it also includes provisions on the recognition of certificates issued by non-EU states. This paper seeks to analyze this certificate, but also the arguments put forward in support of the idea that it would guarantee freedom of movement within the EU, the fears that it would be a means of discrimination against those who wish to exercise this freedom in the EU space and the risk that this instrument will get stuck in the European “digital bureaucracy” in the absence of clear standards by which digital certificates can be interoperable and unanimously valid in the EU space.","PeriodicalId":30571,"journal":{"name":"Polis Revista de Stiinte Politice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Digital Green Certificate - Guarantee of Free Movement within the EU or Means of Discrimination?\",\"authors\":\"I. Apetrei\",\"doi\":\"10.18662/upalaw/64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to facilitate safe travel during the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Commission has proposed the creation of a Digital Green Certificate. This instrument refers to the 27 EU Member States and the non-EU states which are part of the Schengen Area (Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Lichtenstein), but it also includes provisions on the recognition of certificates issued by non-EU states. This paper seeks to analyze this certificate, but also the arguments put forward in support of the idea that it would guarantee freedom of movement within the EU, the fears that it would be a means of discrimination against those who wish to exercise this freedom in the EU space and the risk that this instrument will get stuck in the European “digital bureaucracy” in the absence of clear standards by which digital certificates can be interoperable and unanimously valid in the EU space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polis Revista de Stiinte Politice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polis Revista de Stiinte Politice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polis Revista de Stiinte Politice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了促进2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的安全旅行,欧盟委员会提议创建数字绿色证书。该文书指的是27个欧盟成员国和属于申根地区的非欧盟国家(冰岛、挪威、瑞士和列支敦士登),但它也包括关于承认非欧盟国家颁发的证书的规定。本文试图分析这个证书,还支持的论点提出这个想法,它将保证欧盟内自由流动,担心这将是一个意味着歧视那些希望在欧盟行使这种自由空间和这个乐器的风险将困在欧洲“数字官僚主义”没有明确标准的数字证书可以在欧盟的互操作性和一致有效的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Digital Green Certificate - Guarantee of Free Movement within the EU or Means of Discrimination?
In order to facilitate safe travel during the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Commission has proposed the creation of a Digital Green Certificate. This instrument refers to the 27 EU Member States and the non-EU states which are part of the Schengen Area (Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Lichtenstein), but it also includes provisions on the recognition of certificates issued by non-EU states. This paper seeks to analyze this certificate, but also the arguments put forward in support of the idea that it would guarantee freedom of movement within the EU, the fears that it would be a means of discrimination against those who wish to exercise this freedom in the EU space and the risk that this instrument will get stuck in the European “digital bureaucracy” in the absence of clear standards by which digital certificates can be interoperable and unanimously valid in the EU space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The County and the Realm. Significations and Developments in the History of Romanian Administration Possibilities for Survival and Economic Recovery through Fiscal Relaxation in the Pandemic and Post-pandemic Period Highlighting Price Reductions in Customer Accounting Non-patrimonial Rights Defense – The Right to One's Own Image Main References in Financing the Construction of Dwellings in the Interwar Period in Romania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1