Soma Chatterjee, Shirin Shahrokni, B. Gomez, Monisha Poojary
{"title":"有可能再上一所大学吗?","authors":"Soma Chatterjee, Shirin Shahrokni, B. Gomez, Monisha Poojary","doi":"10.5206/cieeci.v51i1.14829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aspirational postsecondary strategies of Indigenizing and internationalization claim to address pressing political questions such as racism and systemic inequities in the university. Through close examination of these initiatives in two key postsecondary institutions in Toronto, Canada, we show how these priorities instead betray strategic investment in diversity in three specific ways: First, universities are positioned as a horizontal ‘community of changemakers’ that are themselves disarticulated from global relations of inequities. Next, international and Indigenous students’ welcome is made conditional and contingent on their becoming ‘diversity informants’ for the university and its normative membership. Related to that, the claims of curricular diversity remain ‘performative’ and thereby reify established epistemic hierarchies. Finally, while the university is cast as a ‘fraternal community’ these various strategic priorities are managed and executed separately, thereby foreclosing opportunities for robust conversations across the university communities. \n ","PeriodicalId":45946,"journal":{"name":"Research in Comparative and International Education","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another university is possible?\",\"authors\":\"Soma Chatterjee, Shirin Shahrokni, B. Gomez, Monisha Poojary\",\"doi\":\"10.5206/cieeci.v51i1.14829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aspirational postsecondary strategies of Indigenizing and internationalization claim to address pressing political questions such as racism and systemic inequities in the university. Through close examination of these initiatives in two key postsecondary institutions in Toronto, Canada, we show how these priorities instead betray strategic investment in diversity in three specific ways: First, universities are positioned as a horizontal ‘community of changemakers’ that are themselves disarticulated from global relations of inequities. Next, international and Indigenous students’ welcome is made conditional and contingent on their becoming ‘diversity informants’ for the university and its normative membership. Related to that, the claims of curricular diversity remain ‘performative’ and thereby reify established epistemic hierarchies. Finally, while the university is cast as a ‘fraternal community’ these various strategic priorities are managed and executed separately, thereby foreclosing opportunities for robust conversations across the university communities. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":45946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5206/cieeci.v51i1.14829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Comparative and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/cieeci.v51i1.14829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The aspirational postsecondary strategies of Indigenizing and internationalization claim to address pressing political questions such as racism and systemic inequities in the university. Through close examination of these initiatives in two key postsecondary institutions in Toronto, Canada, we show how these priorities instead betray strategic investment in diversity in three specific ways: First, universities are positioned as a horizontal ‘community of changemakers’ that are themselves disarticulated from global relations of inequities. Next, international and Indigenous students’ welcome is made conditional and contingent on their becoming ‘diversity informants’ for the university and its normative membership. Related to that, the claims of curricular diversity remain ‘performative’ and thereby reify established epistemic hierarchies. Finally, while the university is cast as a ‘fraternal community’ these various strategic priorities are managed and executed separately, thereby foreclosing opportunities for robust conversations across the university communities.
期刊介绍:
Research in Comparative and International Education is a peer-reviewed international journal, edited by Hubert Ertl of the University of Oxford, assisted by an Editorial Board and an International Advisory Board of international scholars with a wide range of expertise in comparative and international studies.