“这和爱情有什么关系?”:《俄国犹太人历史中的批判爱情研究》

Chaeran Y. Freeze
{"title":"“这和爱情有什么关系?”:《俄国犹太人历史中的批判爱情研究》","authors":"Chaeran Y. Freeze","doi":"10.1353/jqr.2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I N L E V L E VA N D A’ S Turbulent Times (Goriachee vremia), a novel serialized in Evreiskaia biblioteka between 1871 and 1873, the female protagonists ponder the capacity of Jews to love and be loved. When her suitor Adol’f Krants “ frees” Meri Tidman from the promise of marriage because she is forced to move to another town, she retorts, “How do you like this sincere love, which is really based on practical calculations? No Sophie, say what you will, but we Jews are created in a completely dif fer ent manner. Where other people feel, we only reason. People love with their hearts but we with our intellects.” She observes that unlike Polish Christian youth, Jews do not easily give in to romance.1 The conviction that love in a Jewish key was distinct became a concern for Jews in the Rus sian empire, with re spect to not only marriage, family, and sexuality but also religion and politics. In recent years, a small but innovative body of Jewish scholarship has contributed to the emerging field of Critical Love Studies. According to Renata Grossi and David West, scholars have been divided about the nature of love in modernity. Some have argued that modern love is a dangerous, radical, and “intrinsically subversive” force that promotes “individual autonomy and agency at the cost of disconnection from obligations deriving from family, class position, religious duty, and ethnic affiliation.”2 Others view love as an oppressive ideology that is “embedded in heterosexual","PeriodicalId":22606,"journal":{"name":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","volume":"235 1","pages":"251 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“What’s Love Got to Do With It?”: Critical Love Studies in Russian Jewish History\",\"authors\":\"Chaeran Y. Freeze\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jqr.2022.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I N L E V L E VA N D A’ S Turbulent Times (Goriachee vremia), a novel serialized in Evreiskaia biblioteka between 1871 and 1873, the female protagonists ponder the capacity of Jews to love and be loved. When her suitor Adol’f Krants “ frees” Meri Tidman from the promise of marriage because she is forced to move to another town, she retorts, “How do you like this sincere love, which is really based on practical calculations? No Sophie, say what you will, but we Jews are created in a completely dif fer ent manner. Where other people feel, we only reason. People love with their hearts but we with our intellects.” She observes that unlike Polish Christian youth, Jews do not easily give in to romance.1 The conviction that love in a Jewish key was distinct became a concern for Jews in the Rus sian empire, with re spect to not only marriage, family, and sexuality but also religion and politics. In recent years, a small but innovative body of Jewish scholarship has contributed to the emerging field of Critical Love Studies. According to Renata Grossi and David West, scholars have been divided about the nature of love in modernity. Some have argued that modern love is a dangerous, radical, and “intrinsically subversive” force that promotes “individual autonomy and agency at the cost of disconnection from obligations deriving from family, class position, religious duty, and ethnic affiliation.”2 Others view love as an oppressive ideology that is “embedded in heterosexual\",\"PeriodicalId\":22606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Jewish Quarterly Review\",\"volume\":\"235 1\",\"pages\":\"251 - 255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Jewish Quarterly Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2022.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2022.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“What’s Love Got to Do With It?”: Critical Love Studies in Russian Jewish History
I N L E V L E VA N D A’ S Turbulent Times (Goriachee vremia), a novel serialized in Evreiskaia biblioteka between 1871 and 1873, the female protagonists ponder the capacity of Jews to love and be loved. When her suitor Adol’f Krants “ frees” Meri Tidman from the promise of marriage because she is forced to move to another town, she retorts, “How do you like this sincere love, which is really based on practical calculations? No Sophie, say what you will, but we Jews are created in a completely dif fer ent manner. Where other people feel, we only reason. People love with their hearts but we with our intellects.” She observes that unlike Polish Christian youth, Jews do not easily give in to romance.1 The conviction that love in a Jewish key was distinct became a concern for Jews in the Rus sian empire, with re spect to not only marriage, family, and sexuality but also religion and politics. In recent years, a small but innovative body of Jewish scholarship has contributed to the emerging field of Critical Love Studies. According to Renata Grossi and David West, scholars have been divided about the nature of love in modernity. Some have argued that modern love is a dangerous, radical, and “intrinsically subversive” force that promotes “individual autonomy and agency at the cost of disconnection from obligations deriving from family, class position, religious duty, and ethnic affiliation.”2 Others view love as an oppressive ideology that is “embedded in heterosexual
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hebrew Gomel: Space, Genre, Modernity Va-yo'el Moshe: The Most Anti-Zionist and Anti-Israeli Jewish Text in Modern Times The Mishnah's Reader: Reconsidering Literary Meaning New Science in Old Yiddish: Jewish Vernacular Science and Translation in Early Modern Europe Ya'qūb al-Qirqisānī's Twenty-Fifth through Thirty-Seventh Exegetical Principles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1