出错时的开放和诚实:坦率的职业义务(GMC指南)

H. Jacob, J. Raine
{"title":"出错时的开放和诚实:坦率的职业义务(GMC指南)","authors":"H. Jacob, J. Raine","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2015-309631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In June 2015, the General Medical Council (GMC) and Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) jointly published the guidance Openness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour. 1 This guidance was developed in response to the Francis report about the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.2 It elaborates on the joint statement from eight regulators of healthcare professionals in the UK about the professional responsibility of all healthcare professionals to be honest with patients when things go wrong.3\n\nThe guidance builds on the principles set out by the GMC in Good Medical Practice and by the NMC in The Code: Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for Nurses and Midwives .4 ,5 It is guidance for individuals meaning that even if you are not the person reporting adverse incidents and speaking to patients if things go wrong, you must make sure that someone in the team has taken responsibility for this and support them as needed.\n\nThis guidance applies to all doctors registered with the GMC across the UK. In addition, there is now a statutory duty of candour, meaning a legal obligation, for NHS organisations within England as well as independent health and social care providers. This follows the Health and Social Care Act, which came into force in November 2014. Different laws apply in other parts of the UK.\n\nThe Francis report is explicit that any patient harmed by the provision of a healthcare service is informed of the fact and offered an appropriate remedy, regardless of whether a complaint has been made or a question asked about it. The statutory duty of candour applies when a patient has been subjected to moderate harm or worse, as a result of an error. Cases where an error has led to severe harm or …","PeriodicalId":8153,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition","volume":"33 1","pages":"243 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Openness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour (GMC guideline)\",\"authors\":\"H. Jacob, J. Raine\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2015-309631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In June 2015, the General Medical Council (GMC) and Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) jointly published the guidance Openness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour. 1 This guidance was developed in response to the Francis report about the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.2 It elaborates on the joint statement from eight regulators of healthcare professionals in the UK about the professional responsibility of all healthcare professionals to be honest with patients when things go wrong.3\\n\\nThe guidance builds on the principles set out by the GMC in Good Medical Practice and by the NMC in The Code: Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for Nurses and Midwives .4 ,5 It is guidance for individuals meaning that even if you are not the person reporting adverse incidents and speaking to patients if things go wrong, you must make sure that someone in the team has taken responsibility for this and support them as needed.\\n\\nThis guidance applies to all doctors registered with the GMC across the UK. In addition, there is now a statutory duty of candour, meaning a legal obligation, for NHS organisations within England as well as independent health and social care providers. This follows the Health and Social Care Act, which came into force in November 2014. Different laws apply in other parts of the UK.\\n\\nThe Francis report is explicit that any patient harmed by the provision of a healthcare service is informed of the fact and offered an appropriate remedy, regardless of whether a complaint has been made or a question asked about it. The statutory duty of candour applies when a patient has been subjected to moderate harm or worse, as a result of an error. Cases where an error has led to severe harm or …\",\"PeriodicalId\":8153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

2015年6月,英国医学总委员会(GMC)和护理与助产委员会(NMC)联合发布了《出错时的开放与诚实:坦率的职业义务》指南。1本指南是针对Francis关于中斯塔福德郡NHS基金会信托的报告而制定的。2它详细阐述了英国八家医疗保健专业人员监管机构关于所有医疗保健专业人员在出现问题时对患者诚实的专业责任的联合声明。该指南建立在GMC《良好医疗规范》和NMC《守则:护士和助产士的专业实践和行为标准》中规定的原则之上。4、5这是对个人的指导,意思是即使你不是报告不良事件的人,也不是在事情出错时与病人交谈的人,你必须确保团队中有人对此负责,并在需要时支持他们。本指南适用于在英国GMC注册的所有医生。此外,对于英格兰境内的NHS组织以及独立的健康和社会保健提供者来说,现在有一项法定的坦率义务,这意味着一项法律义务。这是继2014年11月生效的《卫生和社会保障法》之后的又一举措。英国其他地区适用不同的法律。弗朗西斯的报告明确指出,任何因提供医疗保健服务而受到伤害的病人都应被告知这一事实,并得到适当的补救,无论是否提出申诉或是否就此提出问题。当病人因错误而受到中度或更严重的伤害时,法定的坦诚义务适用。错误导致严重伤害或…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Openness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour (GMC guideline)
In June 2015, the General Medical Council (GMC) and Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) jointly published the guidance Openness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour. 1 This guidance was developed in response to the Francis report about the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.2 It elaborates on the joint statement from eight regulators of healthcare professionals in the UK about the professional responsibility of all healthcare professionals to be honest with patients when things go wrong.3 The guidance builds on the principles set out by the GMC in Good Medical Practice and by the NMC in The Code: Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for Nurses and Midwives .4 ,5 It is guidance for individuals meaning that even if you are not the person reporting adverse incidents and speaking to patients if things go wrong, you must make sure that someone in the team has taken responsibility for this and support them as needed. This guidance applies to all doctors registered with the GMC across the UK. In addition, there is now a statutory duty of candour, meaning a legal obligation, for NHS organisations within England as well as independent health and social care providers. This follows the Health and Social Care Act, which came into force in November 2014. Different laws apply in other parts of the UK. The Francis report is explicit that any patient harmed by the provision of a healthcare service is informed of the fact and offered an appropriate remedy, regardless of whether a complaint has been made or a question asked about it. The statutory duty of candour applies when a patient has been subjected to moderate harm or worse, as a result of an error. Cases where an error has led to severe harm or …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Placing education at the centre of the outpatient clinic improves learning and experiences for everyone using the multilevel attainment of learning, teaching and support (MALTS) approach How to… collect urine samples from young children Newborn with hydrops fetalis and a severe supraventricular arrhythmia Enteral lactoferrin supplementation did not reduce the risk of late-onset infection in very preterm infants A child in shock: carotid blowout syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1