威尔斯评分联合年龄调整d -二聚体标准对急性肺栓塞患者的诊断价值

Sheng-bin Zhang, Zhang Qi-chuan, Maohuan Lin, J. Cai, Zhaohui Liu, Ziwen Zhao
{"title":"威尔斯评分联合年龄调整d -二聚体标准对急性肺栓塞患者的诊断价值","authors":"Sheng-bin Zhang, Zhang Qi-chuan, Maohuan Lin, J. Cai, Zhaohui Liu, Ziwen Zhao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-436X.2020.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the diagnostic value of Wells score combined with age-adjusted D-dimer (AADD) standard in acute pulmonary embolism (APE) in inpatients. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 555 inpatients (over 50 years old) with suspected APE from Shantou Central Hospital during October 2010 and November 2018 were divided into low risk groups (Wells score 6) according to Wells criteria, with spiral CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) as the diagnostic mehtod of APE.Meanwhile, the plasma concentration of D-dimer was detected and analyzed by immunoturbidimetry in all patients.The AADD cut-off value was (a patint′s age×10) μg/L.Then the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value(NPV) of Wells criteria, AADD and their combination for APE diagnosis were calculated and compared respectively. \n \n \nResults \nOut of 555 cases, 213 cases were diagnosed as APE by the CTPA.There were 290, 224 and 41 suspected cases which had low, medium and high Wells score respectively.The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of APE diagnosis for low, medium and high Wells score were 24.41%, 57.28% and 18.31%, 30.41%, 70.18% and 99.42%, 17.93%, 54.46% and 95.12%, 82.07%, 45.54% and 4.88%, respectively.The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of AADD were 89.20%, 40.06%, 48.10% and 85.63% respectively.Combinning a low risk Wells score with a negative AADD improved the NPV to 93.04%. \n \n \nConclusions \nPatients with low Wells score and negative AADD may have higher clinical value in eliminating suspected APE. \n \n \nKey words: \nPulmonary embolisms; D-dimer; Age-adjusted; Wells score","PeriodicalId":10004,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Asthma","volume":"27 1","pages":"25-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic value of wells score combined with age-adjusted D-dimer standard in acute pulmonary embolism patients\",\"authors\":\"Sheng-bin Zhang, Zhang Qi-chuan, Maohuan Lin, J. Cai, Zhaohui Liu, Ziwen Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-436X.2020.01.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the diagnostic value of Wells score combined with age-adjusted D-dimer (AADD) standard in acute pulmonary embolism (APE) in inpatients. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA total of 555 inpatients (over 50 years old) with suspected APE from Shantou Central Hospital during October 2010 and November 2018 were divided into low risk groups (Wells score 6) according to Wells criteria, with spiral CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) as the diagnostic mehtod of APE.Meanwhile, the plasma concentration of D-dimer was detected and analyzed by immunoturbidimetry in all patients.The AADD cut-off value was (a patint′s age×10) μg/L.Then the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value(NPV) of Wells criteria, AADD and their combination for APE diagnosis were calculated and compared respectively. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nOut of 555 cases, 213 cases were diagnosed as APE by the CTPA.There were 290, 224 and 41 suspected cases which had low, medium and high Wells score respectively.The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of APE diagnosis for low, medium and high Wells score were 24.41%, 57.28% and 18.31%, 30.41%, 70.18% and 99.42%, 17.93%, 54.46% and 95.12%, 82.07%, 45.54% and 4.88%, respectively.The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of AADD were 89.20%, 40.06%, 48.10% and 85.63% respectively.Combinning a low risk Wells score with a negative AADD improved the NPV to 93.04%. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nPatients with low Wells score and negative AADD may have higher clinical value in eliminating suspected APE. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nPulmonary embolisms; D-dimer; Age-adjusted; Wells score\",\"PeriodicalId\":10004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Asthma\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"25-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Asthma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-436X.2020.01.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-436X.2020.01.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨威尔斯评分联合年龄调整d -二聚体(AADD)标准对住院患者急性肺栓塞(APE)的诊断价值。方法将2010年10月至2018年11月汕头市中心医院住院疑似APE患者555例(50岁以上),按照Wells评分6分的标准分为低危组,以螺旋CT肺血管造影(CTPA)作为APE的诊断方法。同时用免疫比浊法检测并分析所有患者血浆d -二聚体浓度。AADD临界值为(患者的age×10) μg/L。然后分别计算和比较Wells标准、AADD及其联合诊断APE的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果555例患者中,213例经CTPA诊断为APE。井分低、中、高的疑似病例分别为290例、224例和41例。低、中、高Wells评分对APE诊断的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为24.41%、57.28%和18.31%、30.41%、70.18%和99.42%、17.93%、54.46%和95.12%、82.07%、45.54%和4.88%。AADD的敏感性为89.20%,特异性为40.06%,PPV为48.10%,NPV为85.63%。低风险井得分与负AADD相结合将NPV提高到93.04%。结论低Wells评分、AADD阴性的患者在排除疑似APE方面有较高的临床价值。关键词:肺栓塞;肺动脉栓塞;年龄调整;井得分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The diagnostic value of wells score combined with age-adjusted D-dimer standard in acute pulmonary embolism patients
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of Wells score combined with age-adjusted D-dimer (AADD) standard in acute pulmonary embolism (APE) in inpatients. Methods A total of 555 inpatients (over 50 years old) with suspected APE from Shantou Central Hospital during October 2010 and November 2018 were divided into low risk groups (Wells score 6) according to Wells criteria, with spiral CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) as the diagnostic mehtod of APE.Meanwhile, the plasma concentration of D-dimer was detected and analyzed by immunoturbidimetry in all patients.The AADD cut-off value was (a patint′s age×10) μg/L.Then the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value(NPV) of Wells criteria, AADD and their combination for APE diagnosis were calculated and compared respectively. Results Out of 555 cases, 213 cases were diagnosed as APE by the CTPA.There were 290, 224 and 41 suspected cases which had low, medium and high Wells score respectively.The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of APE diagnosis for low, medium and high Wells score were 24.41%, 57.28% and 18.31%, 30.41%, 70.18% and 99.42%, 17.93%, 54.46% and 95.12%, 82.07%, 45.54% and 4.88%, respectively.The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of AADD were 89.20%, 40.06%, 48.10% and 85.63% respectively.Combinning a low risk Wells score with a negative AADD improved the NPV to 93.04%. Conclusions Patients with low Wells score and negative AADD may have higher clinical value in eliminating suspected APE. Key words: Pulmonary embolisms; D-dimer; Age-adjusted; Wells score
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research progress of obstructive sleep apneahypopnea syndrome and coronary heart disease The relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and optic neuropathy Correlationship between oxidative damage and IP-10, Rantes in lung cancer patients Correlation between NADPH oxidase 4 and epithelial mesenchymal transformation in non-small cell lung cancer Efficacy and safety of intravenous antibiotics combined with inhalation of amikacin versus intravenous antibiotics for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1