努力提高对话教学:《英语方法》课堂对话练习的自学

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studying Teacher Education Pub Date : 2021-07-30 DOI:10.1080/17425964.2021.1960499
Todd Reynolds
{"title":"努力提高对话教学:《英语方法》课堂对话练习的自学","authors":"Todd Reynolds","doi":"10.1080/17425964.2021.1960499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Five years after an initial self-study on my dialogic teaching practices in a teacher preparation course, I conducted a follow up study to see if I grew as a dialogic teacher in the same class. This article describes the a second self-study of my dialogic teaching practices in an English methods course, and compares findings with the initial analysis to determine growth over time. Classes were transcribed and then analyzed utilizing Stanza Addressivity Quadrants. The findings indicated that I increased time for student voice in the second class and decreased time for my voice, and that I incorporated structural changes to the way I planned for the second course that increased small group talk and decreased whole-class discussion by keeping discussions focused on specific passages. In those discussions, I used open-ended questions, and focused small group prompts to create more dialogic discussions. However, I also used questions with predetermined answers, and kept interjecting with my thoughts throughout many of those discussions. Even though all kinds of talk have a place in the classroom, I found that my purpose for the discussions did not always match the execution. Implications a focus on relinquishing content control at purposeful moments to allow students to construct knowledge through discussion, and on increasing student-to-student interactions, all while maintaining the small group to whole class structure of the class.","PeriodicalId":45793,"journal":{"name":"Studying Teacher Education","volume":"83 1","pages":"311 - 329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Striving for Improvement in Dialogic Teaching: A Self-Study of the Dialogic Practices in an English Methods Classroom\",\"authors\":\"Todd Reynolds\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425964.2021.1960499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Five years after an initial self-study on my dialogic teaching practices in a teacher preparation course, I conducted a follow up study to see if I grew as a dialogic teacher in the same class. This article describes the a second self-study of my dialogic teaching practices in an English methods course, and compares findings with the initial analysis to determine growth over time. Classes were transcribed and then analyzed utilizing Stanza Addressivity Quadrants. The findings indicated that I increased time for student voice in the second class and decreased time for my voice, and that I incorporated structural changes to the way I planned for the second course that increased small group talk and decreased whole-class discussion by keeping discussions focused on specific passages. In those discussions, I used open-ended questions, and focused small group prompts to create more dialogic discussions. However, I also used questions with predetermined answers, and kept interjecting with my thoughts throughout many of those discussions. Even though all kinds of talk have a place in the classroom, I found that my purpose for the discussions did not always match the execution. Implications a focus on relinquishing content control at purposeful moments to allow students to construct knowledge through discussion, and on increasing student-to-student interactions, all while maintaining the small group to whole class structure of the class.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studying Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"311 - 329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studying Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1960499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studying Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1960499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对自己在教师预备课程中的对话教学实践进行了初步的自我学习五年后,我进行了一项后续研究,看看我是否在同一班级中成长为一名对话教师。本文描述了我在英语方法课程中对话教学实践的第二次自我研究,并将结果与最初的分析进行比较,以确定随着时间的推移增长。对班级进行转录,然后利用节址象限进行分析。结果表明,我在第二节课上增加了学生发言的时间,减少了自己发言的时间,并且我对第二节课的计划进行了结构性的调整,增加了小组讨论,减少了全班讨论,让讨论集中在特定的段落上。在这些讨论中,我使用开放式问题,并集中小组提示来创建更多的对话讨论。然而,我也用预先确定答案的问题,并在许多讨论中不断插入我的想法。尽管各种各样的谈话在课堂上都有一席之地,但我发现我讨论的目的并不总是与执行相匹配。这意味着在有目的的时刻放弃对内容的控制,让学生通过讨论来构建知识,增加学生与学生之间的互动,同时保持小组到全班的课堂结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Striving for Improvement in Dialogic Teaching: A Self-Study of the Dialogic Practices in an English Methods Classroom
ABSTRACT Five years after an initial self-study on my dialogic teaching practices in a teacher preparation course, I conducted a follow up study to see if I grew as a dialogic teacher in the same class. This article describes the a second self-study of my dialogic teaching practices in an English methods course, and compares findings with the initial analysis to determine growth over time. Classes were transcribed and then analyzed utilizing Stanza Addressivity Quadrants. The findings indicated that I increased time for student voice in the second class and decreased time for my voice, and that I incorporated structural changes to the way I planned for the second course that increased small group talk and decreased whole-class discussion by keeping discussions focused on specific passages. In those discussions, I used open-ended questions, and focused small group prompts to create more dialogic discussions. However, I also used questions with predetermined answers, and kept interjecting with my thoughts throughout many of those discussions. Even though all kinds of talk have a place in the classroom, I found that my purpose for the discussions did not always match the execution. Implications a focus on relinquishing content control at purposeful moments to allow students to construct knowledge through discussion, and on increasing student-to-student interactions, all while maintaining the small group to whole class structure of the class.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studying Teacher Education
Studying Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
43.80%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Studying Teacher Education invites submissions from authors who have a strong interest in improving the quality of teaching generally and of teacher education in particular. The central purpose of the journal is to disseminate high-quality research and dialogue in self-study of teacher education practices. Thus the journal is primarily a forum for teacher educators who work in contexts and programs of teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing Methods, Data Collection, and Trustworthiness in Self-Study Research: A Content Analysis of the First 19 Volumes of Studying Teacher Education Self-Study As Reflective Practice and Active Engagement Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) As a Critical Friend: The Affordances and Limitations Self-Study Navigating Boundaries of Race, Culture, Language and Context Experiencing Tensions When Integrating Language Diversity into Mathematics Teacher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1