混合应变电子学和自旋电子学:一种用于逻辑和存储器的超节能范例

Supriyo Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha
{"title":"混合应变电子学和自旋电子学:一种用于逻辑和存储器的超节能范例","authors":"Supriyo Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha","doi":"10.1109/DRC.2012.6257020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excessive energy dissipation during switching of logic and memory bits is the primary impediment to continued downscaling of electronic devices predicted by Moore's law. Nanomagnetic logic and memory switches are innately more energy-efficient than electronic switches because of correlated switching of spins that does not happen when charges are “switched” by moving them into and out of a transistor's channel. Furthermore, magnets do not “leak” unlike transistors. This results in much lower energy dissipation in a nanomagnetic switch compared to an electronic switch. However, this advantage is usually squandered in nanomagnetic logic (NML) paradigms because of very inefficient magnet switching schemes that result in mammoth dissipation in the switching circuit.","PeriodicalId":6808,"journal":{"name":"70th Device Research Conference","volume":"29 1","pages":"35-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid straintronics and spintronics: An ultra energy-efficient paradigm for logic and memory\",\"authors\":\"Supriyo Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DRC.2012.6257020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Excessive energy dissipation during switching of logic and memory bits is the primary impediment to continued downscaling of electronic devices predicted by Moore's law. Nanomagnetic logic and memory switches are innately more energy-efficient than electronic switches because of correlated switching of spins that does not happen when charges are “switched” by moving them into and out of a transistor's channel. Furthermore, magnets do not “leak” unlike transistors. This results in much lower energy dissipation in a nanomagnetic switch compared to an electronic switch. However, this advantage is usually squandered in nanomagnetic logic (NML) paradigms because of very inefficient magnet switching schemes that result in mammoth dissipation in the switching circuit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"70th Device Research Conference\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"35-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"70th Device Research Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRC.2012.6257020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"70th Device Research Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRC.2012.6257020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

逻辑位和存储位转换过程中过多的能量耗散是摩尔定律预测的电子器件持续缩小的主要障碍。纳米磁逻辑和存储开关天生比电子开关更节能,因为自旋的相关开关不会在电荷通过进出晶体管通道而“切换”时发生。此外,磁铁不像晶体管那样“泄漏”。这使得纳米磁开关的能量耗散比电子开关低得多。然而,这种优势在纳米磁逻辑(NML)范例中通常被浪费,因为非常低效的磁开关方案导致开关电路中的巨大耗散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hybrid straintronics and spintronics: An ultra energy-efficient paradigm for logic and memory
Excessive energy dissipation during switching of logic and memory bits is the primary impediment to continued downscaling of electronic devices predicted by Moore's law. Nanomagnetic logic and memory switches are innately more energy-efficient than electronic switches because of correlated switching of spins that does not happen when charges are “switched” by moving them into and out of a transistor's channel. Furthermore, magnets do not “leak” unlike transistors. This results in much lower energy dissipation in a nanomagnetic switch compared to an electronic switch. However, this advantage is usually squandered in nanomagnetic logic (NML) paradigms because of very inefficient magnet switching schemes that result in mammoth dissipation in the switching circuit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancement-mode Al045Ga0.55N/Al0.3Ga0.7N High Electron Mobility Transistor with p-Al0.3Ga0.7N Gate CMOS-compatible Ti/Al ohmic contacts (R c ° C) Role of screening, heating, and dielectrics on high-field transport in graphene Electrical control of nuclear-spin-induced Hall voltage in an inverted InAs heterostructure Piezotronics and piezo-phototronics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1