护理人员和中风医生对国家卫生研究院卒中量表的相互认同:挪威护理人员急性卒中院前项目数字培训模型的验证研究

JMIR neurotechnology Pub Date : 2022-08-11 DOI:10.2196/39444
M. Guterud, H. Bugge, J. Røislien, K. Larsen, Erik Eriksen, Svein Håkon Ingebretsen, Martin Lerstang Mikkelsen, J. Kramer-Johansen, Kristi G. Bache, E. Sandset, M. R. Hov
{"title":"护理人员和中风医生对国家卫生研究院卒中量表的相互认同:挪威护理人员急性卒中院前项目数字培训模型的验证研究","authors":"M. Guterud, H. Bugge, J. Røislien, K. Larsen, Erik Eriksen, Svein Håkon Ingebretsen, Martin Lerstang Mikkelsen, J. Kramer-Johansen, Kristi G. Bache, E. Sandset, M. R. Hov","doi":"10.2196/39444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Time spent in the prehospital phase of acute stroke care is multifactorial and has an effect on the possibilities for acute treatment. Communication between paramedics and the in-hospital stroke team directly affects time to treatment. A mutual stroke scale such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) may improve communication quality. The Paramedic Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project (ParaNASPP) was a stepped-wedge, randomized trial of stroke screening using NIHSS in the ambulance where the intervention was training paramedics in stroke and the NIHSS, with the use of NIHSS made into a mobile app to guide the examination and facilitate communication with the in-hospital stroke team.\n \n \n \n The aim of this study was to validate the digital training model from the ParaNASPP clinical trial.\n \n \n \n In total, 24 paramedics were recruited from Oslo University Hospital in Norway to complete the ParaNASPP training model; 20 exclusive videos with predefined NIHSS scores were recorded; and 4 stroke physicians from Oslo University Hospital were included for reference. Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated—first comparing paramedics and stroke physicians to the predefined scores and then with each other. The predefined LoA were set to 3 points. To align with clinical practice, NIHSS scores were also dichotomized into 2 categories: from 0-5 (minor stroke) or ≥6 (moderate and major stroke), and agreement was calculated using Cohen κ.\n \n \n \n The videos (n=20) had a median (range) NIHSS score of 7 (0-31). The paramedics’ scores were slightly higher than the predefined scores with a mean difference of –0.38 and the LoA ranging from –4.04 to 3.29. The paramedics scored higher than the stroke physicians with a mean difference of –0.39, with the LoA ranging from –4.58 to 3.80. When the NIHSS scores were dichotomized, Cohen κ was 0.89 between the predefined scores and paramedics, 0.92 between the predefined scores and stroke physicians, and 0.81 between the paramedics and stroke physicians, all indicating very good agreement.\n \n \n \n The paramedics scored higher than both the predefined scores and stroke physicians’ scores, hence the predefined LoA were not met. However, the width of the LoA was smaller than seen when experienced neurologists are compared. When the NIHSS scores were dichotomized, the paramedics achieved very good agreement with both the predefined scores and stroke physicians’ scores. This study demonstrates the possibilities for the transfer of clinical competence in digital simulation training.\n","PeriodicalId":73555,"journal":{"name":"JMIR neurotechnology","volume":"99 27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrater Agreement on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Between Paramedics and Stroke Physicians: Validation Study for the Digital Training Model in the Paramedic Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project\",\"authors\":\"M. Guterud, H. Bugge, J. Røislien, K. Larsen, Erik Eriksen, Svein Håkon Ingebretsen, Martin Lerstang Mikkelsen, J. Kramer-Johansen, Kristi G. Bache, E. Sandset, M. R. Hov\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/39444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Time spent in the prehospital phase of acute stroke care is multifactorial and has an effect on the possibilities for acute treatment. Communication between paramedics and the in-hospital stroke team directly affects time to treatment. A mutual stroke scale such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) may improve communication quality. The Paramedic Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project (ParaNASPP) was a stepped-wedge, randomized trial of stroke screening using NIHSS in the ambulance where the intervention was training paramedics in stroke and the NIHSS, with the use of NIHSS made into a mobile app to guide the examination and facilitate communication with the in-hospital stroke team.\\n \\n \\n \\n The aim of this study was to validate the digital training model from the ParaNASPP clinical trial.\\n \\n \\n \\n In total, 24 paramedics were recruited from Oslo University Hospital in Norway to complete the ParaNASPP training model; 20 exclusive videos with predefined NIHSS scores were recorded; and 4 stroke physicians from Oslo University Hospital were included for reference. Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated—first comparing paramedics and stroke physicians to the predefined scores and then with each other. The predefined LoA were set to 3 points. To align with clinical practice, NIHSS scores were also dichotomized into 2 categories: from 0-5 (minor stroke) or ≥6 (moderate and major stroke), and agreement was calculated using Cohen κ.\\n \\n \\n \\n The videos (n=20) had a median (range) NIHSS score of 7 (0-31). The paramedics’ scores were slightly higher than the predefined scores with a mean difference of –0.38 and the LoA ranging from –4.04 to 3.29. The paramedics scored higher than the stroke physicians with a mean difference of –0.39, with the LoA ranging from –4.58 to 3.80. When the NIHSS scores were dichotomized, Cohen κ was 0.89 between the predefined scores and paramedics, 0.92 between the predefined scores and stroke physicians, and 0.81 between the paramedics and stroke physicians, all indicating very good agreement.\\n \\n \\n \\n The paramedics scored higher than both the predefined scores and stroke physicians’ scores, hence the predefined LoA were not met. However, the width of the LoA was smaller than seen when experienced neurologists are compared. When the NIHSS scores were dichotomized, the paramedics achieved very good agreement with both the predefined scores and stroke physicians’ scores. This study demonstrates the possibilities for the transfer of clinical competence in digital simulation training.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":73555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR neurotechnology\",\"volume\":\"99 27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR neurotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/39444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR neurotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/39444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在急性卒中院前护理阶段花费的时间是多因素的,对急性治疗的可能性有影响。护理人员和住院中风团队之间的沟通直接影响到治疗时间。一个共同的中风量表,如美国国立卫生研究院中风量表(NIHSS)可以改善沟通质量。护理人员挪威急性卒中院前项目(ParaNASPP)是一项阶梯式随机试验,在救护车中使用NIHSS进行卒中筛查,干预措施是培训护理人员卒中和NIHSS,并将NIHSS制作成移动应用程序,以指导检查并促进与院内卒中团队的沟通。本研究的目的是验证来自ParaNASPP临床试验的数字训练模型。总共从挪威奥斯陆大学医院征聘了24名护理人员,以完成ParaNASPP培训模式;录制20个预置NIHSS评分的独家视频;4名来自奥斯陆大学医院的中风医生作为参考。计算具有95%一致性限(LoA)的Bland-Altman图,首先将护理人员和中风医生与预定义分数进行比较,然后相互比较。预定义的LoA设置为3个点。为了与临床实践保持一致,NIHSS评分也被分为2类:0-5分(轻度卒中)或≥6分(中度和重度卒中),并使用Cohen κ计算一致性。视频(n=20)的NIHSS评分中位数(范围)为7(0-31)。护理人员的得分略高于预定义得分,平均差值为-0.38,LoA范围为-4.04 ~ 3.29。护理人员得分高于中风医生,平均差异为-0.39,LoA范围为-4.58至3.80。对NIHSS评分进行二分类时,预定义评分与护理人员的Cohen κ值为0.89,与卒中医生的Cohen κ值为0.92,与卒中医生的Cohen κ值为0.81,一致性很好。护理人员得分高于预定义得分和卒中医师得分,因此不符合预定义LoA。然而,与经验丰富的神经科医生相比,LoA的宽度要小。对NIHSS评分进行二分类时,护理人员与预先设定的评分和脑卒中医师的评分都达到了很好的一致性。本研究证明了在数字模拟训练中临床能力转移的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interrater Agreement on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Between Paramedics and Stroke Physicians: Validation Study for the Digital Training Model in the Paramedic Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project
Time spent in the prehospital phase of acute stroke care is multifactorial and has an effect on the possibilities for acute treatment. Communication between paramedics and the in-hospital stroke team directly affects time to treatment. A mutual stroke scale such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) may improve communication quality. The Paramedic Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project (ParaNASPP) was a stepped-wedge, randomized trial of stroke screening using NIHSS in the ambulance where the intervention was training paramedics in stroke and the NIHSS, with the use of NIHSS made into a mobile app to guide the examination and facilitate communication with the in-hospital stroke team. The aim of this study was to validate the digital training model from the ParaNASPP clinical trial. In total, 24 paramedics were recruited from Oslo University Hospital in Norway to complete the ParaNASPP training model; 20 exclusive videos with predefined NIHSS scores were recorded; and 4 stroke physicians from Oslo University Hospital were included for reference. Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated—first comparing paramedics and stroke physicians to the predefined scores and then with each other. The predefined LoA were set to 3 points. To align with clinical practice, NIHSS scores were also dichotomized into 2 categories: from 0-5 (minor stroke) or ≥6 (moderate and major stroke), and agreement was calculated using Cohen κ. The videos (n=20) had a median (range) NIHSS score of 7 (0-31). The paramedics’ scores were slightly higher than the predefined scores with a mean difference of –0.38 and the LoA ranging from –4.04 to 3.29. The paramedics scored higher than the stroke physicians with a mean difference of –0.39, with the LoA ranging from –4.58 to 3.80. When the NIHSS scores were dichotomized, Cohen κ was 0.89 between the predefined scores and paramedics, 0.92 between the predefined scores and stroke physicians, and 0.81 between the paramedics and stroke physicians, all indicating very good agreement. The paramedics scored higher than both the predefined scores and stroke physicians’ scores, hence the predefined LoA were not met. However, the width of the LoA was smaller than seen when experienced neurologists are compared. When the NIHSS scores were dichotomized, the paramedics achieved very good agreement with both the predefined scores and stroke physicians’ scores. This study demonstrates the possibilities for the transfer of clinical competence in digital simulation training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smartphone Pupillometry and Machine Learning for Detection of Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Cohort Study Direct Clinical Applications of Natural Language Processing in Common Neurological Disorders: Scoping Review Virtual Reality–Based Neurorehabilitation Support Tool for People With Cognitive Impairments Resulting From an Acquired Brain Injury: Usability and Feasibility Study The Easy and Versatile Neural Recording Platform (T-REX): Design and Development Study Connect Brain, a Mobile App for Studying Depth Perception in Angiography Visualization: Gamification Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1