让市场为公众利益服务:在苏格兰通过最低定价规则打击有害酒精消费

A. Andreangeli
{"title":"让市场为公众利益服务:在苏格兰通过最低定价规则打击有害酒精消费","authors":"A. Andreangeli","doi":"10.1093/yel/yex004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from the example offered by the 2015 SWA preliminary ruling, this paper will examine the current approaches to price control rules and then critique them against the wider background of the principles governing, respectively, Union action in the field of internal market policy and member states' intervention directed at safeguarding high levels of public health. It will be argued that given the renewed commitment to respecting the principle of conferral, resulting from the Treaty of Lisbon, it may be time for a reassessment of the scope of Article 34 TFEU so that the member states can continue exercising the legitimate regulatory powers that they enjoy in this area, albeit within limits dictated by the demands of a well-functioning internal market. Additional Information:","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"71 1","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making markets work in the public interest: Combating hazardous alcohol consumption through minimum pricing rules in Scotland\",\"authors\":\"A. Andreangeli\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/yel/yex004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Starting from the example offered by the 2015 SWA preliminary ruling, this paper will examine the current approaches to price control rules and then critique them against the wider background of the principles governing, respectively, Union action in the field of internal market policy and member states' intervention directed at safeguarding high levels of public health. It will be argued that given the renewed commitment to respecting the principle of conferral, resulting from the Treaty of Lisbon, it may be time for a reassessment of the scope of Article 34 TFEU so that the member states can continue exercising the legitimate regulatory powers that they enjoy in this area, albeit within limits dictated by the demands of a well-functioning internal market. Additional Information:\",\"PeriodicalId\":41752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"1-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yex004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yex004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从2015年SWA初步裁决提供的例子开始,本文将审查当前价格控制规则的方法,然后在更广泛的原则背景下对它们进行批评,分别是欧盟在内部市场政策领域的行动和成员国旨在保障高水平公共卫生的干预。有人认为,鉴于《里斯本条约》(Treaty of Lisbon)重新承诺尊重授予原则,或许是时候重新评估第34条TFEU的范围了,这样成员国就可以继续行使它们在这一领域享有的合法监管权力,尽管这是在一个运作良好的内部市场的要求所限定的范围内。附加信息:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making markets work in the public interest: Combating hazardous alcohol consumption through minimum pricing rules in Scotland
Starting from the example offered by the 2015 SWA preliminary ruling, this paper will examine the current approaches to price control rules and then critique them against the wider background of the principles governing, respectively, Union action in the field of internal market policy and member states' intervention directed at safeguarding high levels of public health. It will be argued that given the renewed commitment to respecting the principle of conferral, resulting from the Treaty of Lisbon, it may be time for a reassessment of the scope of Article 34 TFEU so that the member states can continue exercising the legitimate regulatory powers that they enjoy in this area, albeit within limits dictated by the demands of a well-functioning internal market. Additional Information:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
The unified patent court Corporate tax reform in the European Union: are the stars finally aligned? Rescuing transparency in the digital economy: in search of a common notion in EU consumer and data protection law The impact of the Digital Content Directive on online platforms’ Terms of Service The European Union’s Preferential Trade Agreements: between convergence and differentiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1