高风险问责政策与地方适应:探索学校校长如何应对多重政策需求

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Leadership & Management Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI:10.1080/13632434.2021.2016687
Michalis Constantinides
{"title":"高风险问责政策与地方适应:探索学校校长如何应对多重政策需求","authors":"Michalis Constantinides","doi":"10.1080/13632434.2021.2016687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Rationalising school activities through principles of standards, testing and accountability has taken a strong hold and continues to be the dominant logic for educational reform in England. This article examines the ways in which three principals of English academies understand and respond to accountability policies as required by their Multi-Academy Trust (MAT) and external demands. A sensemaking perspective is adopted to explore how school principals come to interpret, negotiate and adapt messages and pressures about accountability policies in their efforts to respond to their local contexts. Based on an analysis of data from three academies, this article highlights the active role of school leaders in the enactment processes of policies related to curriculum and pedagogy, data monitoring, resource allocation and performance management. Findings reveal the variations in the degree of autonomy the participating leaders enjoyed in some of these areas, in which they appeared to interpret and adjust policies as needed to fit their schools and communities. Insights from individual leaders’ sensemaking provide an important contribution to research on how academies respond to high-stakes accountability policies in that the meanings leaders make determine the actions and decisions they take on instructional priorities.","PeriodicalId":47255,"journal":{"name":"School Leadership & Management","volume":"78 1","pages":"170 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-stakes accountability policies and local adaptation: exploring how school principals respond to multiple policy demands\",\"authors\":\"Michalis Constantinides\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13632434.2021.2016687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Rationalising school activities through principles of standards, testing and accountability has taken a strong hold and continues to be the dominant logic for educational reform in England. This article examines the ways in which three principals of English academies understand and respond to accountability policies as required by their Multi-Academy Trust (MAT) and external demands. A sensemaking perspective is adopted to explore how school principals come to interpret, negotiate and adapt messages and pressures about accountability policies in their efforts to respond to their local contexts. Based on an analysis of data from three academies, this article highlights the active role of school leaders in the enactment processes of policies related to curriculum and pedagogy, data monitoring, resource allocation and performance management. Findings reveal the variations in the degree of autonomy the participating leaders enjoyed in some of these areas, in which they appeared to interpret and adjust policies as needed to fit their schools and communities. Insights from individual leaders’ sensemaking provide an important contribution to research on how academies respond to high-stakes accountability policies in that the meanings leaders make determine the actions and decisions they take on instructional priorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"170 - 187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.2016687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.2016687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通过标准、考试和问责等原则使学校活动合理化已经成为英国教育改革的主要逻辑,并将继续成为主导逻辑。本文考察了英国学院的三位校长如何理解和响应多学院信托基金(MAT)和外部需求所要求的问责制政策。本文采用意义建构的观点来探讨学校校长如何在努力回应当地情况的过程中解释、协商和适应有关问责政策的信息和压力。基于对三所院校数据的分析,本文强调了学校领导在课程和教学法、数据监测、资源分配和绩效管理等相关政策制定过程中的积极作用。调查结果显示,参与调查的领导人在其中一些领域享有不同程度的自主权,他们似乎可以根据需要解释和调整政策,以适应他们的学校和社区。来自个别领导人意义建构的见解为研究学院如何应对高风险问责政策提供了重要贡献,因为领导者的意义决定了他们在教学优先事项上采取的行动和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-stakes accountability policies and local adaptation: exploring how school principals respond to multiple policy demands
ABSTRACT Rationalising school activities through principles of standards, testing and accountability has taken a strong hold and continues to be the dominant logic for educational reform in England. This article examines the ways in which three principals of English academies understand and respond to accountability policies as required by their Multi-Academy Trust (MAT) and external demands. A sensemaking perspective is adopted to explore how school principals come to interpret, negotiate and adapt messages and pressures about accountability policies in their efforts to respond to their local contexts. Based on an analysis of data from three academies, this article highlights the active role of school leaders in the enactment processes of policies related to curriculum and pedagogy, data monitoring, resource allocation and performance management. Findings reveal the variations in the degree of autonomy the participating leaders enjoyed in some of these areas, in which they appeared to interpret and adjust policies as needed to fit their schools and communities. Insights from individual leaders’ sensemaking provide an important contribution to research on how academies respond to high-stakes accountability policies in that the meanings leaders make determine the actions and decisions they take on instructional priorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Leadership & Management
School Leadership & Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.60%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: School Leadership & Management welcomes articles on all aspects of educational leadership and management. As a highly cited and internationally known SCOPUS journal, School Leadership and Management is fundamentally concerned with issues of leadership and management in classrooms, schools, and school systems. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes articles that contribute to the field in the following ways: Scholarly articles that draw upon empirical evidence to provide new insights into leadership and management practices; Scholarly articles that explore alternative, critical, and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management; Scholarly articles that provide state of the art reviews within an national or international context; Scholarly articles reporting new empirical findings that make an original contribution to the field; Scholarly articles that make a theoretical contribution which extends and deepens our understanding of the key issues associated with leadership, management, and the direct relationship with organisational change and improvement; Scholarly articles that focus primarily upon leadership and management issues but are aimed at academic, policymaking and practitioner audiences; Contributions from policymakers and practitioners, where there is a clear leadership and management focus. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes: •articles that explore alternative, critical and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management •articles that are written for academics but are aimed at both a practitioner and academic audience •contributions from practitioners, provided that the relationship between theory and practice is made explicit.
期刊最新文献
Note Exploring principals’ process of gathering, reflecting upon and implementing feedback from their teachers: a grounded theory From crisis leadership to digital and inclusive leadership in the aftermath of the pandemic ‘Intersectional collaboration’: a new form of leadership from the WomenEd movement Navigating uncharted waters: leadership insights from successfully reopened schools amid the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1