一个脆弱永恒的世界:现代犹太思想、政治和两次世界大战之间对不朽的追求

A. Biemann
{"title":"一个脆弱永恒的世界:现代犹太思想、政治和两次世界大战之间对不朽的追求","authors":"A. Biemann","doi":"10.1353/jqr.2022.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Interwar Europe saw a deep yearning for eternity among Jewish and Christian thinkers. This yearning also included a renewed attention to the difficult concepts of immortality and resurrection, which took on moral meaning akin to repentance and repair. Beginning with Karl Löwith’s famous critique of Heidegger’s Being and Time through Rosenzweig’s eternity philosophy, this essay reads the Star of Redemption in concert with the writings of Max Scheler, Hermann Cohen, Leo Baeck, Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, Martin Buber, and Ernst Cassirer, situating Rosenzweig’s work within an interwar “eternalism,” in which eternity appeared as a worldly concept resisting historical pessimism and the politics of fate. As such, the concept of eternity functioned less as a flight from history and worldly politics than as a conscious critique of historical time and the power of finitude. This restores meaning to Löwith’s assertion that politics as an endeavor of humanity needs the horizon of eternity, while the same horizon of eternity, for Cohen and Rosenzweig, offered also a vision of perpetual peace.","PeriodicalId":22606,"journal":{"name":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","volume":"105 1","pages":"164 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A World of Weak Eternities: Modern Jewish Thought, the Political, and the Interwar Quest for Immortality\",\"authors\":\"A. Biemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jqr.2022.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Interwar Europe saw a deep yearning for eternity among Jewish and Christian thinkers. This yearning also included a renewed attention to the difficult concepts of immortality and resurrection, which took on moral meaning akin to repentance and repair. Beginning with Karl Löwith’s famous critique of Heidegger’s Being and Time through Rosenzweig’s eternity philosophy, this essay reads the Star of Redemption in concert with the writings of Max Scheler, Hermann Cohen, Leo Baeck, Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, Martin Buber, and Ernst Cassirer, situating Rosenzweig’s work within an interwar “eternalism,” in which eternity appeared as a worldly concept resisting historical pessimism and the politics of fate. As such, the concept of eternity functioned less as a flight from history and worldly politics than as a conscious critique of historical time and the power of finitude. This restores meaning to Löwith’s assertion that politics as an endeavor of humanity needs the horizon of eternity, while the same horizon of eternity, for Cohen and Rosenzweig, offered also a vision of perpetual peace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Jewish Quarterly Review\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"164 - 191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Jewish Quarterly Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2022.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2022.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:两次世界大战之间的欧洲,犹太和基督教思想家对永恒有着深切的向往。这种渴望还包括重新关注不朽和复活的困难概念,这些概念具有类似于忏悔和修复的道德意义。本文从卡尔Löwith通过罗森茨威格的永恒哲学对海德格尔的存在与时间的著名批判开始,与马克斯·舍勒、赫尔曼·科恩、利奥·贝克、尤金·罗森施托克·休西、马丁·布伯和恩斯特·卡西尔的著作一起阅读《救赎之星》,将罗森茨威格的作品置于两次世界大战之间的“永恒主义”之中,在这种永恒主义中,永恒作为一种世俗的概念出现,抵制历史悲观主义和命运政治。因此,永恒概念的作用与其说是逃避历史和世俗政治,不如说是对历史时间和有限性力量的有意识批判。这恢复了Löwith的主张的意义,即政治作为人类的努力需要永恒的地平线,而同样的永恒的地平线,对科恩和罗森茨威格来说,也提供了一个永久和平的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A World of Weak Eternities: Modern Jewish Thought, the Political, and the Interwar Quest for Immortality
Abstract:Interwar Europe saw a deep yearning for eternity among Jewish and Christian thinkers. This yearning also included a renewed attention to the difficult concepts of immortality and resurrection, which took on moral meaning akin to repentance and repair. Beginning with Karl Löwith’s famous critique of Heidegger’s Being and Time through Rosenzweig’s eternity philosophy, this essay reads the Star of Redemption in concert with the writings of Max Scheler, Hermann Cohen, Leo Baeck, Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, Martin Buber, and Ernst Cassirer, situating Rosenzweig’s work within an interwar “eternalism,” in which eternity appeared as a worldly concept resisting historical pessimism and the politics of fate. As such, the concept of eternity functioned less as a flight from history and worldly politics than as a conscious critique of historical time and the power of finitude. This restores meaning to Löwith’s assertion that politics as an endeavor of humanity needs the horizon of eternity, while the same horizon of eternity, for Cohen and Rosenzweig, offered also a vision of perpetual peace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hebrew Gomel: Space, Genre, Modernity Va-yo'el Moshe: The Most Anti-Zionist and Anti-Israeli Jewish Text in Modern Times The Mishnah's Reader: Reconsidering Literary Meaning New Science in Old Yiddish: Jewish Vernacular Science and Translation in Early Modern Europe Ya'qūb al-Qirqisānī's Twenty-Fifth through Thirty-Seventh Exegetical Principles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1