不完全是赖特:重新执行弗兰克·劳埃德·赖特的建筑原址

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Future Anterior Pub Date : 2020-06-28 DOI:10.5749/futuante.15.2.0063
A. Paine
{"title":"不完全是赖特:重新执行弗兰克·劳埃德·赖特的建筑原址","authors":"A. Paine","doi":"10.5749/futuante.15.2.0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:When the threat of recurrent flooding forced the drastic decision to move Frank Lloyd Wright's 1954 Bachman-Wilson House in New Jersey to the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, Arkansas, not all of the building made the journey. Despite the museum's assertion that the \"entire structure was … taken apart and each component … labeled, packed, and moved to the Museum, where it was reconstructed in 2015,\" photographs of the reconstruction and other statements by the museum confirm otherwise. In reality, only the mahogany linings, timber surfaces, joinery, and furniture were reused—much of the building's structure was left behind or in storage.Like many buildings reconstructed for display ex situ, the Bachman-Wilson house has undergone a major transformation. Detached from their supporting structures, architectural fragments, facades, period rooms, and entire houses have become new, distorted, and ambiguous objects in museum collections, often likened pejoratively to theatrical stage sets. What, however, should be made of such exhibits, and what might they reveal about architecture more generally? Through a focused study of the Bachman-Wilson House, this essay offers a theorized account of the transformation of architecture relocated for display, providing new insights into such aberrant and misunderstood monuments.","PeriodicalId":53609,"journal":{"name":"Future Anterior","volume":"15 1","pages":"62 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not Quite Wright: Re-performing Frank Lloyd Wright's Architecture Ex Situ\",\"authors\":\"A. Paine\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/futuante.15.2.0063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:When the threat of recurrent flooding forced the drastic decision to move Frank Lloyd Wright's 1954 Bachman-Wilson House in New Jersey to the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, Arkansas, not all of the building made the journey. Despite the museum's assertion that the \\\"entire structure was … taken apart and each component … labeled, packed, and moved to the Museum, where it was reconstructed in 2015,\\\" photographs of the reconstruction and other statements by the museum confirm otherwise. In reality, only the mahogany linings, timber surfaces, joinery, and furniture were reused—much of the building's structure was left behind or in storage.Like many buildings reconstructed for display ex situ, the Bachman-Wilson house has undergone a major transformation. Detached from their supporting structures, architectural fragments, facades, period rooms, and entire houses have become new, distorted, and ambiguous objects in museum collections, often likened pejoratively to theatrical stage sets. What, however, should be made of such exhibits, and what might they reveal about architecture more generally? Through a focused study of the Bachman-Wilson House, this essay offers a theorized account of the transformation of architecture relocated for display, providing new insights into such aberrant and misunderstood monuments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Anterior\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"62 - 79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Anterior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.15.2.0063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Anterior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.15.2.0063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:由于频繁的洪水威胁,建筑师不得不做出一个重大的决定,将弗兰克·劳埃德·赖特(Frank Lloyd Wright) 1954年在新泽西州建造的巴赫曼-威尔逊故居(Bachman-Wilson House)搬到阿肯色州本顿维尔(Bentonville)的水晶桥美国艺术博物馆(Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art),但并非所有的建筑都能完成搬迁。尽管博物馆声称“整个结构被……拆开,每个部件都被……贴上标签、包装,并转移到博物馆,并于2015年在那里重建”,但重建的照片和博物馆的其他声明却证实了相反的情况。实际上,只有红木衬里、木材表面、细木工和家具被重新利用,建筑的大部分结构都被留下或储存起来。像许多重建的建筑一样,巴赫曼-威尔逊的房子也经历了一次重大的转变。从支撑结构中分离出来,建筑碎片、立面、时代房间和整个房屋已经成为博物馆收藏中新的、扭曲的和模糊的对象,经常被贬义地比作戏剧舞台布景。然而,我们应该如何看待这样的展览?它们可能会更普遍地揭示建筑的哪些方面?通过对巴赫曼-威尔逊故居的重点研究,这篇文章提供了一个理论化的描述,为重新安置的展示建筑的转变提供了新的见解,为这些异常和被误解的纪念碑提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Not Quite Wright: Re-performing Frank Lloyd Wright's Architecture Ex Situ
Abstract:When the threat of recurrent flooding forced the drastic decision to move Frank Lloyd Wright's 1954 Bachman-Wilson House in New Jersey to the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, Arkansas, not all of the building made the journey. Despite the museum's assertion that the "entire structure was … taken apart and each component … labeled, packed, and moved to the Museum, where it was reconstructed in 2015," photographs of the reconstruction and other statements by the museum confirm otherwise. In reality, only the mahogany linings, timber surfaces, joinery, and furniture were reused—much of the building's structure was left behind or in storage.Like many buildings reconstructed for display ex situ, the Bachman-Wilson house has undergone a major transformation. Detached from their supporting structures, architectural fragments, facades, period rooms, and entire houses have become new, distorted, and ambiguous objects in museum collections, often likened pejoratively to theatrical stage sets. What, however, should be made of such exhibits, and what might they reveal about architecture more generally? Through a focused study of the Bachman-Wilson House, this essay offers a theorized account of the transformation of architecture relocated for display, providing new insights into such aberrant and misunderstood monuments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Anterior
Future Anterior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Life and Death of Skanderbeg Square: A Chronicle of an Undoing Foretold, in a Hundred Years Slightly Disappointing Ruins and the Facades of Tourist Imagery Dirty Industry, Heritage, and the Erasure of Immigrant Pasts The Necessary Interlinking of Culture and Climate Change Heritage Conservation in Postcolonial India: Approaches and Challenges ed. by Manish Chalana and Ashima Krishna (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1