实时RT-PCR评价样品和RNA提取池检测SARS-CoV-2 RNA的有效性

M. Sulthan, S. Shihab, B. N. Iqbal, A. P. Pitawela, Faseeha Noordeen
{"title":"实时RT-PCR评价样品和RNA提取池检测SARS-CoV-2 RNA的有效性","authors":"M. Sulthan, S. Shihab, B. N. Iqbal, A. P. Pitawela, Faseeha Noordeen","doi":"10.4038/sljid.v13i2.8574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pooled testing is a cost-effective approach to increasing testing capacity during pandemics. This study analysed the effectiveness of pooling of samples and RNA extracts for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real time RT-PCR.Methods: Twenty SARS-CoV-2 positive samples with Ct value of 25–35 and 60 known negative samples based on initial PCR results were used for this study. The samples were used to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold pooled samples prior to extraction. The RNA extracts of a further 10 PCR positive samples were pooled to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold RNA extract pools. The Ct values of neat samples and pooled samples were compared using the paired t-test with a 95% confidence interval. The same was done for the neat RNA extracts and the extract pools.Results: The detection capacity was considerably lower when the pool size was increased from 2- to 8-fold in sample pooling, whereas pools of RNA extracts showed 100% detection from 2- to 8-fold dilution. The increase in Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold sample dilutions were 1.69 ± 0.78, 3.84 ± 1.47 and 8.98 ± 2.25, respectively (P < 0.0001). However, there was a small rise in the Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold extract pools (1.01 ± 0.38, 2.18 ± 0.82 and 3.05 ± 0.77, respectively).Conclusions: Large scale screening of asymptomatic individuals for SARS-CoV-2 can be maximised with optimal use of resources by 2- or 4-fold pooling of samples or 4- or 8-fold pooling of RNA extracts without significantly compromising the detection capacity.","PeriodicalId":32303,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effectiveness of sample and RNA extract pool testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real time RT-PCR\",\"authors\":\"M. Sulthan, S. Shihab, B. N. Iqbal, A. P. Pitawela, Faseeha Noordeen\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/sljid.v13i2.8574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Pooled testing is a cost-effective approach to increasing testing capacity during pandemics. This study analysed the effectiveness of pooling of samples and RNA extracts for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real time RT-PCR.Methods: Twenty SARS-CoV-2 positive samples with Ct value of 25–35 and 60 known negative samples based on initial PCR results were used for this study. The samples were used to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold pooled samples prior to extraction. The RNA extracts of a further 10 PCR positive samples were pooled to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold RNA extract pools. The Ct values of neat samples and pooled samples were compared using the paired t-test with a 95% confidence interval. The same was done for the neat RNA extracts and the extract pools.Results: The detection capacity was considerably lower when the pool size was increased from 2- to 8-fold in sample pooling, whereas pools of RNA extracts showed 100% detection from 2- to 8-fold dilution. The increase in Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold sample dilutions were 1.69 ± 0.78, 3.84 ± 1.47 and 8.98 ± 2.25, respectively (P < 0.0001). However, there was a small rise in the Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold extract pools (1.01 ± 0.38, 2.18 ± 0.82 and 3.05 ± 0.77, respectively).Conclusions: Large scale screening of asymptomatic individuals for SARS-CoV-2 can be maximised with optimal use of resources by 2- or 4-fold pooling of samples or 4- or 8-fold pooling of RNA extracts without significantly compromising the detection capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljid.v13i2.8574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljid.v13i2.8574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:集中检测是在大流行期间提高检测能力的一种经济有效的方法。本研究分析了实时RT-PCR检测SARS-CoV-2的样品池和RNA提取物的有效性。方法:选取Ct值在25 ~ 35之间的20份SARS-CoV-2阳性样本和初步PCR结果已知的60份阴性样本进行研究。样品在提取前分别制备2倍、4倍和8倍混合样品。将另外10个PCR阳性样本的RNA提取液合并为2倍、4倍和8倍RNA提取液池。纯样本和合并样本的Ct值比较采用配对t检验,置信区间为95%。对纯RNA提取物和提取池进行同样的处理。结果:当池大小在样品池中从2倍增加到8倍时,检测能力明显降低,而RNA提取物池在稀释2至8倍时检测能力为100%。2倍、4倍和8倍样品稀释液的Ct值增加分别为1.69±0.78、3.84±1.47和8.98±2.25 (P < 0.0001)。然而,2倍、4倍和8倍提取池的Ct值略有上升(分别为1.01±0.38、2.18±0.82和3.05±0.77)。结论:通过2倍或4倍的样本池或4倍或8倍的RNA提取池,可以最大限度地大规模筛查无症状个体的SARS-CoV-2,而不会显著影响检测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the effectiveness of sample and RNA extract pool testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real time RT-PCR
Introduction: Pooled testing is a cost-effective approach to increasing testing capacity during pandemics. This study analysed the effectiveness of pooling of samples and RNA extracts for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real time RT-PCR.Methods: Twenty SARS-CoV-2 positive samples with Ct value of 25–35 and 60 known negative samples based on initial PCR results were used for this study. The samples were used to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold pooled samples prior to extraction. The RNA extracts of a further 10 PCR positive samples were pooled to prepare 2-, 4- and 8-fold RNA extract pools. The Ct values of neat samples and pooled samples were compared using the paired t-test with a 95% confidence interval. The same was done for the neat RNA extracts and the extract pools.Results: The detection capacity was considerably lower when the pool size was increased from 2- to 8-fold in sample pooling, whereas pools of RNA extracts showed 100% detection from 2- to 8-fold dilution. The increase in Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold sample dilutions were 1.69 ± 0.78, 3.84 ± 1.47 and 8.98 ± 2.25, respectively (P < 0.0001). However, there was a small rise in the Ct value of 2-, 4- and 8-fold extract pools (1.01 ± 0.38, 2.18 ± 0.82 and 3.05 ± 0.77, respectively).Conclusions: Large scale screening of asymptomatic individuals for SARS-CoV-2 can be maximised with optimal use of resources by 2- or 4-fold pooling of samples or 4- or 8-fold pooling of RNA extracts without significantly compromising the detection capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Serologic evidence of Zika virus, hepatitis B virus and rubella virus in pregnant women attending a south-west based Nigerian tertiary care centre An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based study Antibiotic allergy: Mislabels, Misinterpretation and Mismanagement Clinical characteristics and analysis of treatment outcome at one year of rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis cases during the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic (2nd wave); experiences from a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata, India Detection of carbapenemase producing enterobacterales using the Modified Hodge Test from clinical isolates in Colombo South Teaching Hospital and Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital, Sri Lanka in 2017 Comparison of broth microdilution and E-test for susceptibility of MRSA to vancomycin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1