0.2%洗必泰漱口水与1%聚维酮碘预防重症监护室早期呼吸机获得性肺炎的比较

F. Chandra, A. Hanafie, Tasrif Hamdi
{"title":"0.2%洗必泰漱口水与1%聚维酮碘预防重症监护室早期呼吸机获得性肺炎的比较","authors":"F. Chandra, A. Hanafie, Tasrif Hamdi","doi":"10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is a ward that is prone to nosocomial infections. Mechanical ventilation (MV) support is often required by 10-20% of patients admitted to the ICU, where there is always a risk of developed Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia (VAP). Poor oral hygiene can lead to bacterial colonization of the oropharynx and aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions into the lower respiratory tract is a major factor in the occurrence of VAP. In addition, VAP is an important cause of morbidity, increased use of health resources, increased length of ICU stay and costs. Therefore, since 2003, various efforts have been made to reduce the incidence of VAP in the ICU, one of which is the use of antiseptic mouthwash which is expected to reduce the incidence of VAP. Objective: Obtain the results of chlorhexidine 0,2% mouthwash compared to povidone iodine 1% mouthwash in preventing the incidence of Early VAP in RSUP Haji Adam Malik Medan. Methods: The research design is randomized clinical trial with a single blind method. After obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 40 research samples were collected which, after fulfilling the inclusion criteria, were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A received chlorhexidine 0,2% and group B received povidone iodine 1%. The research data obtained were tested using SPSS. Results: CPIS value < 6 at 48 hours was higher in the 0.2% chlorhexidine group than the 1% povidone iodine group, but not statistically significant (p = 0.170). The most common distribution of germs found were Acinetobacter baumanii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusion: The incidence of Early VAP appeared to be less in the group receiving 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash compared to the 1% povidone iodine group but not statistically significant. In the 0.2% chlorhexidine group, the incidence of Early VAP was 22.5%. In the 1% povidone iodine group, the incidence of Early VAP was 32.5%. The distribution of germs obtained from the culture results shows that Acinetobacter baumanii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are still the main causes of VAP in the ICU of Haji Adam","PeriodicalId":14290,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 0.2% Chlorhexidine Mouthwash with 1% Povidone Iodine in Preventing the Incidence of Early Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit of RSUP Haji Adam Malik Medan\",\"authors\":\"F. Chandra, A. Hanafie, Tasrif Hamdi\",\"doi\":\"10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is a ward that is prone to nosocomial infections. Mechanical ventilation (MV) support is often required by 10-20% of patients admitted to the ICU, where there is always a risk of developed Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia (VAP). Poor oral hygiene can lead to bacterial colonization of the oropharynx and aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions into the lower respiratory tract is a major factor in the occurrence of VAP. In addition, VAP is an important cause of morbidity, increased use of health resources, increased length of ICU stay and costs. Therefore, since 2003, various efforts have been made to reduce the incidence of VAP in the ICU, one of which is the use of antiseptic mouthwash which is expected to reduce the incidence of VAP. Objective: Obtain the results of chlorhexidine 0,2% mouthwash compared to povidone iodine 1% mouthwash in preventing the incidence of Early VAP in RSUP Haji Adam Malik Medan. Methods: The research design is randomized clinical trial with a single blind method. After obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 40 research samples were collected which, after fulfilling the inclusion criteria, were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A received chlorhexidine 0,2% and group B received povidone iodine 1%. The research data obtained were tested using SPSS. Results: CPIS value < 6 at 48 hours was higher in the 0.2% chlorhexidine group than the 1% povidone iodine group, but not statistically significant (p = 0.170). The most common distribution of germs found were Acinetobacter baumanii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusion: The incidence of Early VAP appeared to be less in the group receiving 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash compared to the 1% povidone iodine group but not statistically significant. In the 0.2% chlorhexidine group, the incidence of Early VAP was 22.5%. In the 1% povidone iodine group, the incidence of Early VAP was 32.5%. The distribution of germs obtained from the culture results shows that Acinetobacter baumanii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are still the main causes of VAP in the ICU of Haji Adam\",\"PeriodicalId\":14290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护病房(ICU)是院内感染的高发病房。10-20%入住ICU的患者通常需要机械通气(MV)支持,因为ICU总是存在发展为呼吸机获得性肺炎(VAP)的风险。口腔卫生不良可导致细菌在口咽部定植,口咽部分泌物吸入下呼吸道是VAP发生的主要因素。此外,VAP是发病率、卫生资源使用增加、ICU住院时间延长和费用增加的重要原因。因此,自2003年以来,人们采取了各种措施来降低ICU中VAP的发病率,其中一项措施是使用抗菌漱口水,有望降低VAP的发病率。目的:比较0.2%氯己定漱口水与1%聚维酮碘漱口水对急性呼吸道感染患者早期VAP的预防效果。方法:采用单盲随机临床试验设计。经棉兰苏门答腊北方大学医学院伦理委员会批准,收集研究样本40份,符合纳入标准后随机分为2组。A组0.2%氯己定,B组1%聚维酮碘。所得研究数据采用SPSS软件进行检验。结果:0.2%氯己定组48 h CPIS值< 6高于1%聚维酮碘组,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.170)。最常见的细菌分布是鲍曼不动杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌。结论:0.2%氯己定漱口水组早期VAP发生率明显低于1%聚维酮碘组,但无统计学意义。0.2%氯己定组早期VAP发生率为22.5%。1%聚维酮碘组早期VAP发生率为32.5%。从培养结果中获得的细菌分布显示,鲍曼不动杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌仍然是Haji Adam ICU中VAP的主要原因
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of 0.2% Chlorhexidine Mouthwash with 1% Povidone Iodine in Preventing the Incidence of Early Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit of RSUP Haji Adam Malik Medan
Background: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is a ward that is prone to nosocomial infections. Mechanical ventilation (MV) support is often required by 10-20% of patients admitted to the ICU, where there is always a risk of developed Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia (VAP). Poor oral hygiene can lead to bacterial colonization of the oropharynx and aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions into the lower respiratory tract is a major factor in the occurrence of VAP. In addition, VAP is an important cause of morbidity, increased use of health resources, increased length of ICU stay and costs. Therefore, since 2003, various efforts have been made to reduce the incidence of VAP in the ICU, one of which is the use of antiseptic mouthwash which is expected to reduce the incidence of VAP. Objective: Obtain the results of chlorhexidine 0,2% mouthwash compared to povidone iodine 1% mouthwash in preventing the incidence of Early VAP in RSUP Haji Adam Malik Medan. Methods: The research design is randomized clinical trial with a single blind method. After obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 40 research samples were collected which, after fulfilling the inclusion criteria, were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A received chlorhexidine 0,2% and group B received povidone iodine 1%. The research data obtained were tested using SPSS. Results: CPIS value < 6 at 48 hours was higher in the 0.2% chlorhexidine group than the 1% povidone iodine group, but not statistically significant (p = 0.170). The most common distribution of germs found were Acinetobacter baumanii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusion: The incidence of Early VAP appeared to be less in the group receiving 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash compared to the 1% povidone iodine group but not statistically significant. In the 0.2% chlorhexidine group, the incidence of Early VAP was 22.5%. In the 1% povidone iodine group, the incidence of Early VAP was 32.5%. The distribution of germs obtained from the culture results shows that Acinetobacter baumanii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are still the main causes of VAP in the ICU of Haji Adam
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Correlation Of Depression With Coronary Heart Disease Leadership and motivation in increasing Public satisfaction through employee performance at the Regional Secretary of Majalengka Regency The effect of Loan to Deposit Ratio(LDR), Non-Performing Loan(NPL), Other Operating Expenses, and Non-Interest Income on Profitability(ROA) Intelligent Form Generator Using Expert Systems Occurrence of mycotoxin-producing molds isolated from stored peanut grains from different markets in Brazzaville, Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1