自我调节学习策略如何干预元认知和决策拖延症

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology Society & Education Pub Date : 2019-04-24 DOI:10.25115/PSYE.V10I1.1932
V. Palo, L. Monacis, M. Sinatra
{"title":"自我调节学习策略如何干预元认知和决策拖延症","authors":"V. Palo, L. Monacis, M. Sinatra","doi":"10.25115/PSYE.V10I1.1932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generally conceptualized as a failure of performance, procrastination has been a central focus of psycho-educational research. Among the various facets of the construct, decisional procrastination has been scarcely analyzed in relation with self-regulated learning strategies. Assuming a cognitive standpoint we investigated the linkage between decisional procrastination and metacognitive beliefs about procrastination, taking into account self-regulated learning strategies as potential mediators. A sample of 296 undergraduate students filled out a questionnaire measuring metacognitive beliefs about procrastination, concentration on academic tasks and interests in academic success, and decisional procrastination. The hypothesized model was partially confirmed: Results from structural equation model indicated that: (1) positive metacognitive beliefs about procrastination had an adverse impact on both concentration and interests; (2) concentration mediated the relationship between positive metacognitions and decisional procrastination. Although the results were preliminary in nature, they provided a basis for examining procrastination as a barrier to academic success. Some professional indications for education were suggested","PeriodicalId":44869,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Society & Education","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How self-regulated learning strategies interfere between metacognitions and decisional procrastination\",\"authors\":\"V. Palo, L. Monacis, M. Sinatra\",\"doi\":\"10.25115/PSYE.V10I1.1932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Generally conceptualized as a failure of performance, procrastination has been a central focus of psycho-educational research. Among the various facets of the construct, decisional procrastination has been scarcely analyzed in relation with self-regulated learning strategies. Assuming a cognitive standpoint we investigated the linkage between decisional procrastination and metacognitive beliefs about procrastination, taking into account self-regulated learning strategies as potential mediators. A sample of 296 undergraduate students filled out a questionnaire measuring metacognitive beliefs about procrastination, concentration on academic tasks and interests in academic success, and decisional procrastination. The hypothesized model was partially confirmed: Results from structural equation model indicated that: (1) positive metacognitive beliefs about procrastination had an adverse impact on both concentration and interests; (2) concentration mediated the relationship between positive metacognitions and decisional procrastination. Although the results were preliminary in nature, they provided a basis for examining procrastination as a barrier to academic success. Some professional indications for education were suggested\",\"PeriodicalId\":44869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Society & Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Society & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25115/PSYE.V10I1.1932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Society & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25115/PSYE.V10I1.1932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

拖延症通常被定义为表现的失败,一直是心理教育研究的中心焦点。在这个结构的各个方面中,决策拖延症与自我调节学习策略的关系很少被分析。本研究从认知角度考察了决策拖延症与拖延症的元认知信念之间的联系,并考虑了自我调节学习策略作为潜在的中介因素。296名大学生填写了一份调查问卷,测量他们对拖延症、对学业任务的专注和对学业成功的兴趣以及决策拖延症的元认知信念。结构方程模型的结果表明:(1)拖延的积极元认知信念对注意力和兴趣都有不利影响;(2)专注在积极元认知与决策拖延之间起中介作用。虽然这些结果是初步的,但它们为研究拖延症是学业成功的障碍提供了基础。提出了教育的专业指征
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How self-regulated learning strategies interfere between metacognitions and decisional procrastination
Generally conceptualized as a failure of performance, procrastination has been a central focus of psycho-educational research. Among the various facets of the construct, decisional procrastination has been scarcely analyzed in relation with self-regulated learning strategies. Assuming a cognitive standpoint we investigated the linkage between decisional procrastination and metacognitive beliefs about procrastination, taking into account self-regulated learning strategies as potential mediators. A sample of 296 undergraduate students filled out a questionnaire measuring metacognitive beliefs about procrastination, concentration on academic tasks and interests in academic success, and decisional procrastination. The hypothesized model was partially confirmed: Results from structural equation model indicated that: (1) positive metacognitive beliefs about procrastination had an adverse impact on both concentration and interests; (2) concentration mediated the relationship between positive metacognitions and decisional procrastination. Although the results were preliminary in nature, they provided a basis for examining procrastination as a barrier to academic success. Some professional indications for education were suggested
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology Society & Education
Psychology Society & Education PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Construyendo ocios intergeneracionales, entre la vida y la escuela Espacios intergeneracionales de ocio y redes de apoyo social en jóvenes egresados del sistema de protección El currículum oculto visual en los libros de texto de Educación Física: Una revisión sistemática Percepción del tamaño corporal actual y deseado en la niñez temprana Intergenerational leisure and family reconciliation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1