{"title":"在英国建筑工地遇到未爆炸炸弹的概率是多少?","authors":"J. Gask, J. Moran","doi":"10.1680/jgeen.21.00138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative risk data is essential for the efficient and consistent assessment of risk and allows for the effective use of cost-benefit analysis for assessing mitigating measures. The quantitative assessment of the risk posed by unexploded bombs (UXBs) on construction sites within the U.K. involves the identification of a set of contributory risk factors and modelling the interaction between them. The interaction of the risk factors has been modelled using Monte Carlo Simulation built into a new risk assessment tool (JG-MCS). Some of the output results from the tool are presented, including the limited validation that is possible against published work. The tool is used to assess the sensitivity of risk to some of the problem variables and several of the underlying assumptions are investigated. The model has also been extended to explore the influence of investigative mitigation measures. In this paper a set of fundamental questions are raised regarding the risks being assessed, how they are presented and the efficacy of some mitigation measures. For the scenario used, it was found that the overall risk of UXB encounter was low before mitigation and only slightly lower after mitigation. It was also found that the cost of implementing measures to reduce the risk posed by UXBs might be considered to be below the bracket of what is described by the HSE as ‘reasonably practicable’.","PeriodicalId":54572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"29 17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the probability of encountering unexploded bombs on a U.K. construction site?\",\"authors\":\"J. Gask, J. Moran\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jgeen.21.00138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantitative risk data is essential for the efficient and consistent assessment of risk and allows for the effective use of cost-benefit analysis for assessing mitigating measures. The quantitative assessment of the risk posed by unexploded bombs (UXBs) on construction sites within the U.K. involves the identification of a set of contributory risk factors and modelling the interaction between them. The interaction of the risk factors has been modelled using Monte Carlo Simulation built into a new risk assessment tool (JG-MCS). Some of the output results from the tool are presented, including the limited validation that is possible against published work. The tool is used to assess the sensitivity of risk to some of the problem variables and several of the underlying assumptions are investigated. The model has also been extended to explore the influence of investigative mitigation measures. In this paper a set of fundamental questions are raised regarding the risks being assessed, how they are presented and the efficacy of some mitigation measures. For the scenario used, it was found that the overall risk of UXB encounter was low before mitigation and only slightly lower after mitigation. It was also found that the cost of implementing measures to reduce the risk posed by UXBs might be considered to be below the bracket of what is described by the HSE as ‘reasonably practicable’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"29 17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.21.00138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.21.00138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
What is the probability of encountering unexploded bombs on a U.K. construction site?
Quantitative risk data is essential for the efficient and consistent assessment of risk and allows for the effective use of cost-benefit analysis for assessing mitigating measures. The quantitative assessment of the risk posed by unexploded bombs (UXBs) on construction sites within the U.K. involves the identification of a set of contributory risk factors and modelling the interaction between them. The interaction of the risk factors has been modelled using Monte Carlo Simulation built into a new risk assessment tool (JG-MCS). Some of the output results from the tool are presented, including the limited validation that is possible against published work. The tool is used to assess the sensitivity of risk to some of the problem variables and several of the underlying assumptions are investigated. The model has also been extended to explore the influence of investigative mitigation measures. In this paper a set of fundamental questions are raised regarding the risks being assessed, how they are presented and the efficacy of some mitigation measures. For the scenario used, it was found that the overall risk of UXB encounter was low before mitigation and only slightly lower after mitigation. It was also found that the cost of implementing measures to reduce the risk posed by UXBs might be considered to be below the bracket of what is described by the HSE as ‘reasonably practicable’.
期刊介绍:
Geotechnical Engineering provides a forum for the publication of high quality, topical and relevant technical papers covering all aspects of geotechnical research, design, construction and performance. The journal aims to be of interest to those civil, structural or geotechnical engineering practitioners wishing to develop a greater understanding of the influence of geotechnics on the built environment.