偏见内隐联想测试效果

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.1027/0044-3409/A000007
Maria Popa-Roch, F. Delmas
{"title":"偏见内隐联想测试效果","authors":"Maria Popa-Roch, F. Delmas","doi":"10.1027/0044-3409/A000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-concept is accessible information that can be used when facing a demanding task. Based on findings suggesting that effects observed in Implicit Association Tests (IATs) could be partially explained by the procedural features of the task, we investigated the role of participants’ self-inclusion in target categories for group IATs. We propose that IAT constraints lead participants to use self-relevant heuristics related to their membership of target categories in order to respond rapidly, which contributes to IAT group preferences. Thus positive IAT effects should dramatically diminish if participants were induced not to use self-related heuristics. Study 1 showed that when mapping outgroup names and idiosyncratic characteristics of participants onto the same category during the IAT task, the IAT effect no longer occurs. Study 2 replicated these findings when associating outgroup-participants’ idiosyncratic characteristics prior to the completion of the standard IAT. Therefore inhibiting the use of sel...","PeriodicalId":47289,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","volume":"9 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prejudice Implicit Association Test Effects\",\"authors\":\"Maria Popa-Roch, F. Delmas\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/0044-3409/A000007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Self-concept is accessible information that can be used when facing a demanding task. Based on findings suggesting that effects observed in Implicit Association Tests (IATs) could be partially explained by the procedural features of the task, we investigated the role of participants’ self-inclusion in target categories for group IATs. We propose that IAT constraints lead participants to use self-relevant heuristics related to their membership of target categories in order to respond rapidly, which contributes to IAT group preferences. Thus positive IAT effects should dramatically diminish if participants were induced not to use self-related heuristics. Study 1 showed that when mapping outgroup names and idiosyncratic characteristics of participants onto the same category during the IAT task, the IAT effect no longer occurs. Study 2 replicated these findings when associating outgroup-participants’ idiosyncratic characteristics prior to the completion of the standard IAT. Therefore inhibiting the use of sel...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"44-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/A000007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/A000007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

自我概念是在面对高要求任务时可以使用的可访问信息。基于内隐联想测试(IATs)中观察到的效应可以部分地用任务的程序特征来解释的研究结果,我们研究了参与者在目标类别中的自我包容在群体IATs中的作用。我们认为,IAT约束导致参与者使用与其目标类别成员相关的自相关启发式来快速响应,这有助于IAT群体偏好。因此,如果参与者被诱导不使用自我相关启发式,积极的IAT效应应该显著减弱。研究1表明,在内测任务中将外群名称和参与者的特质特征映射到同一类别时,内测效应不再发生。研究2在将外组参与者在完成标准IAT之前的特质特征联系起来时重复了这些发现。因此,抑制使用……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prejudice Implicit Association Test Effects
Self-concept is accessible information that can be used when facing a demanding task. Based on findings suggesting that effects observed in Implicit Association Tests (IATs) could be partially explained by the procedural features of the task, we investigated the role of participants’ self-inclusion in target categories for group IATs. We propose that IAT constraints lead participants to use self-relevant heuristics related to their membership of target categories in order to respond rapidly, which contributes to IAT group preferences. Thus positive IAT effects should dramatically diminish if participants were induced not to use self-related heuristics. Study 1 showed that when mapping outgroup names and idiosyncratic characteristics of participants onto the same category during the IAT task, the IAT effect no longer occurs. Study 2 replicated these findings when associating outgroup-participants’ idiosyncratic characteristics prior to the completion of the standard IAT. Therefore inhibiting the use of sel...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology
Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Reviewers 2023 Advancing Health Psychology Through Ecological Bio-Psycho-Social Assessments Physical Activity and Social Participation in Older Adults in a Cross-Over Intervention Trial How Accurately Do Children Indicate Their Smartphone Social Media Use? Contextual Factors Associated With Temptations and Lapses Among Smokers Trying to Quit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1