心脏植入式电子装置植入术患者的抗血栓管理

A. Zupan Mežnar, Jan Alatič, Jus Ksela, M. Miklič, M. Jan, F. Naji, D. Vokac, D. Žižek
{"title":"心脏植入式电子装置植入术患者的抗血栓管理","authors":"A. Zupan Mežnar, Jan Alatič, Jus Ksela, M. Miklič, M. Jan, F. Naji, D. Vokac, D. Žižek","doi":"10.6016/zdravvestn.3402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are an established treatment option for arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death prevention, and heart failure. Approximately 1000 devices are implanted per million inhabitants in European countries each year. However, the main concern in patients with an indication for CIED implantation is frequently associated with comorbidities requiring antithrombotic medications. The invasive device implantation procedure represents a bleeding risk ranging from pocket hematoma to cardiac tamponade. On the other hand, temporary interruption of antithrombotic therapy increases the risk for thromboembolic events. Implanting CIEDs in patients on antithrombotic medications incites several clinical dilemmas of balancing thromboembolic risk against bleeding risk, as complications are associated with higher mortality rates in both aspects. The most common bleeding complication is pocket haematoma formation, which is associated with a prolonged hospital stay, higher cost, higher risk of pocket infection, and thus higher morbidity and mortality. Studies have shown that the heparin bridging strategy in patients on oral anticoagulants imposes a greater risk for pocket haematoma formation and no benefit in reducing thromboembolic events. Most procedures of CIED implantation can be performed safely with uninterrupted oral anticoagulants. Dual antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of pocket haematoma and should be avoided whenever possible.","PeriodicalId":21777,"journal":{"name":"Slovenian Medical Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antithrombotic management in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation\",\"authors\":\"A. Zupan Mežnar, Jan Alatič, Jus Ksela, M. Miklič, M. Jan, F. Naji, D. Vokac, D. Žižek\",\"doi\":\"10.6016/zdravvestn.3402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are an established treatment option for arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death prevention, and heart failure. Approximately 1000 devices are implanted per million inhabitants in European countries each year. However, the main concern in patients with an indication for CIED implantation is frequently associated with comorbidities requiring antithrombotic medications. The invasive device implantation procedure represents a bleeding risk ranging from pocket hematoma to cardiac tamponade. On the other hand, temporary interruption of antithrombotic therapy increases the risk for thromboembolic events. Implanting CIEDs in patients on antithrombotic medications incites several clinical dilemmas of balancing thromboembolic risk against bleeding risk, as complications are associated with higher mortality rates in both aspects. The most common bleeding complication is pocket haematoma formation, which is associated with a prolonged hospital stay, higher cost, higher risk of pocket infection, and thus higher morbidity and mortality. Studies have shown that the heparin bridging strategy in patients on oral anticoagulants imposes a greater risk for pocket haematoma formation and no benefit in reducing thromboembolic events. Most procedures of CIED implantation can be performed safely with uninterrupted oral anticoagulants. Dual antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of pocket haematoma and should be avoided whenever possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slovenian Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slovenian Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6016/zdravvestn.3402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovenian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6016/zdravvestn.3402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏植入式电子装置(CIEDs)是心律失常、心源性猝死预防和心力衰竭的既定治疗选择。在欧洲国家,每年每100万居民中大约有1000个装置被植入。然而,对于有CIED植入指征的患者,主要关注的问题往往与需要抗血栓药物治疗的合并症有关。侵入性装置植入过程有出血风险,从口袋血肿到心脏填塞。另一方面,暂时中断抗栓治疗会增加血栓栓塞事件的风险。在服用抗栓药物的患者中植入cied会引发平衡血栓栓塞风险和出血风险的几个临床难题,因为并发症在这两个方面都与较高的死亡率相关。最常见的出血并发症是口袋血肿的形成,这与住院时间延长、费用增加、口袋感染风险增加有关,从而导致更高的发病率和死亡率。研究表明,口服抗凝药物患者的肝素桥接策略增加了口袋血肿形成的风险,并且在减少血栓栓塞事件方面没有任何益处。在不间断口服抗凝剂的情况下,大多数CIED植入手术都可以安全进行。双重抗血小板治疗增加口袋血肿的风险,应尽可能避免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antithrombotic management in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are an established treatment option for arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death prevention, and heart failure. Approximately 1000 devices are implanted per million inhabitants in European countries each year. However, the main concern in patients with an indication for CIED implantation is frequently associated with comorbidities requiring antithrombotic medications. The invasive device implantation procedure represents a bleeding risk ranging from pocket hematoma to cardiac tamponade. On the other hand, temporary interruption of antithrombotic therapy increases the risk for thromboembolic events. Implanting CIEDs in patients on antithrombotic medications incites several clinical dilemmas of balancing thromboembolic risk against bleeding risk, as complications are associated with higher mortality rates in both aspects. The most common bleeding complication is pocket haematoma formation, which is associated with a prolonged hospital stay, higher cost, higher risk of pocket infection, and thus higher morbidity and mortality. Studies have shown that the heparin bridging strategy in patients on oral anticoagulants imposes a greater risk for pocket haematoma formation and no benefit in reducing thromboembolic events. Most procedures of CIED implantation can be performed safely with uninterrupted oral anticoagulants. Dual antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of pocket haematoma and should be avoided whenever possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sodelovanje in vztrajanje bolnikov z multiplo sklerozo pri zdravljenju z zdravili Indeks kakovosti zraka in njegov pomen pri varovanju javnega zdravja Obravnava epileptičnega statusa pri odraslih Motnje srčnega ritma zaradi hiperdigitalisnega stanja in akutna obravnava zastrupljencev z digoksinom Bioethics in sport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1