来自BJOG外部的见解

A. Kent, S. Kirtley
{"title":"来自BJOG外部的见解","authors":"A. Kent, S. Kirtley","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.16009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A woman diagnosed with pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks’ gestation presents a clinical challenge. Prior to 34 weeks, the risks of prematurity are high and conservative management is followed if possible, whereas after 37 weeks the risks of maternal deterioration outweigh the neonatal risks and delivery is usually indicated. To guide clinicians, a trial was undertaken in nearly 50 maternity units in the UK where women presenting with preeclampsia during this critical gestational window were allocated to immediate delivery or conservative therapy, and both maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes were monitored (Chappell et al. Lancet 2019;394:1181–90). From the total cohort of 900 women, those in the immediate delivery group had fewer severe hypertensive episodes (65%) compared with those treated conservatively (75%), which the authors interpret as being strong evidence suggesting that planned delivery reduces maternal morbidity. Fetal/neonatal negative outcomes, based primarily on the need for neonatal unit admission, were higher in the induction group (42%) compared with the expectant management group (34%). The number of serious adverse events to mother and baby in each group was similar, at approximately 1%. Other considerations were a caesarean section rate above 50% in both groups and higher costs (13%) in the expectant management group, primarily due to inpatient care prior to delivery. It should be noted that these data are from high-income situations where options for the mother and safeguards for the neonate are available. This research reiterates the high-risk nature of the 2–3% of pregnancies that develop pre-eclampsia and that appropriate facilities must be provided for dealing with maternal and neonatal complications. Where these do exist, there is room for shared decision making on the timing of the delivery. Epidemiologically, it can be anticipated that the incidence of pre-eclampsia will increase as it is linked to maternal age and is often superimposed on chronic hypertension. Both of these indices are rising – at least in high-income countries such as the USA, according to a long-term study (Ananth et al. Hypertension 2019; 74:1089–95). Surprisingly, although chronic hypertension rates are increasing by 6% per annum, the authors do not link this rise to elevated trends in body mass index.","PeriodicalId":8984,"journal":{"name":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights from outside BJOG\",\"authors\":\"A. Kent, S. Kirtley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.16009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A woman diagnosed with pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks’ gestation presents a clinical challenge. Prior to 34 weeks, the risks of prematurity are high and conservative management is followed if possible, whereas after 37 weeks the risks of maternal deterioration outweigh the neonatal risks and delivery is usually indicated. To guide clinicians, a trial was undertaken in nearly 50 maternity units in the UK where women presenting with preeclampsia during this critical gestational window were allocated to immediate delivery or conservative therapy, and both maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes were monitored (Chappell et al. Lancet 2019;394:1181–90). From the total cohort of 900 women, those in the immediate delivery group had fewer severe hypertensive episodes (65%) compared with those treated conservatively (75%), which the authors interpret as being strong evidence suggesting that planned delivery reduces maternal morbidity. Fetal/neonatal negative outcomes, based primarily on the need for neonatal unit admission, were higher in the induction group (42%) compared with the expectant management group (34%). The number of serious adverse events to mother and baby in each group was similar, at approximately 1%. Other considerations were a caesarean section rate above 50% in both groups and higher costs (13%) in the expectant management group, primarily due to inpatient care prior to delivery. It should be noted that these data are from high-income situations where options for the mother and safeguards for the neonate are available. This research reiterates the high-risk nature of the 2–3% of pregnancies that develop pre-eclampsia and that appropriate facilities must be provided for dealing with maternal and neonatal complications. Where these do exist, there is room for shared decision making on the timing of the delivery. Epidemiologically, it can be anticipated that the incidence of pre-eclampsia will increase as it is linked to maternal age and is often superimposed on chronic hypertension. Both of these indices are rising – at least in high-income countries such as the USA, according to a long-term study (Ananth et al. Hypertension 2019; 74:1089–95). Surprisingly, although chronic hypertension rates are increasing by 6% per annum, the authors do not link this rise to elevated trends in body mass index.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一名妇女被诊断为先兆子痫之间34和37周妊娠提出了临床挑战。在34周之前,早产的风险很高,如果可能,应采取保守治疗,而在37周之后,产妇恶化的风险大于新生儿风险,通常需要分娩。为了指导临床医生,在英国近50个产科单位进行了一项试验,在这个关键的妊娠窗口期出现先兆子痫的妇女被分配到立即分娩或保守治疗,并监测母体和胎儿/新生儿结局(Chappell等)。柳叶刀394:1181 2019;90)。在总共900名妇女中,与保守分娩组(75%)相比,立即分娩组的严重高血压发作(65%)较少,作者认为这是强有力的证据,表明计划分娩降低了孕产妇发病率。胎儿/新生儿的不良结局(主要基于新生儿住院的需要)在诱导组(42%)高于待产管理组(34%)。两组中母亲和婴儿的严重不良事件数量相似,约为1%。其他考虑因素是两组的剖宫产率均高于50%,而预期管理组的成本较高(13%),主要是由于分娩前的住院治疗。应该指出的是,这些数据来自高收入情况,在这些情况下,母亲有选择,新生儿有保障。这项研究重申了2-3%发生先兆子痫的孕妇的高风险性质,必须提供适当的设施来处理产妇和新生儿并发症。如果这些确实存在,那么在交付时间方面就有共同决策的余地。从流行病学的角度来看,可以预见先兆子痫的发病率将会增加,因为它与产妇年龄有关,并且经常叠加在慢性高血压上。根据一项长期研究(Ananth等),这两个指数都在上升——至少在美国等高收入国家如此。高血压2019;74:1089 - 95)。令人惊讶的是,尽管慢性高血压的发病率正以每年6%的速度增长,但作者并没有将这种增长与身体质量指数的上升趋势联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insights from outside BJOG
A woman diagnosed with pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks’ gestation presents a clinical challenge. Prior to 34 weeks, the risks of prematurity are high and conservative management is followed if possible, whereas after 37 weeks the risks of maternal deterioration outweigh the neonatal risks and delivery is usually indicated. To guide clinicians, a trial was undertaken in nearly 50 maternity units in the UK where women presenting with preeclampsia during this critical gestational window were allocated to immediate delivery or conservative therapy, and both maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes were monitored (Chappell et al. Lancet 2019;394:1181–90). From the total cohort of 900 women, those in the immediate delivery group had fewer severe hypertensive episodes (65%) compared with those treated conservatively (75%), which the authors interpret as being strong evidence suggesting that planned delivery reduces maternal morbidity. Fetal/neonatal negative outcomes, based primarily on the need for neonatal unit admission, were higher in the induction group (42%) compared with the expectant management group (34%). The number of serious adverse events to mother and baby in each group was similar, at approximately 1%. Other considerations were a caesarean section rate above 50% in both groups and higher costs (13%) in the expectant management group, primarily due to inpatient care prior to delivery. It should be noted that these data are from high-income situations where options for the mother and safeguards for the neonate are available. This research reiterates the high-risk nature of the 2–3% of pregnancies that develop pre-eclampsia and that appropriate facilities must be provided for dealing with maternal and neonatal complications. Where these do exist, there is room for shared decision making on the timing of the delivery. Epidemiologically, it can be anticipated that the incidence of pre-eclampsia will increase as it is linked to maternal age and is often superimposed on chronic hypertension. Both of these indices are rising – at least in high-income countries such as the USA, according to a long-term study (Ananth et al. Hypertension 2019; 74:1089–95). Surprisingly, although chronic hypertension rates are increasing by 6% per annum, the authors do not link this rise to elevated trends in body mass index.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parents', Families', Communities' and Healthcare Professionals' Experiences of Care Following Neonatal Death in Healthcare Facilities in LMICs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography. Birth Outcomes After Pertussis and Influenza Diagnosed in Pregnancy: A Retrospective, Population-Based Study. Maternal Lipids in Pregnancy and Later Life Dyslipidemia: The POUCHmoms Longitudinal Cohort Study. Unpacking the Complex Relationship Between Postpartum Haemorrhage and Cardiovascular Disease A Comment on Green Top Guideline No. 31: Investigating and Care in the Small-For-Gestational-Age and Growth Restricted Foetus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1